 |

Monday, February 23, 2009
Monday, February 23, 2009. Chaos and violence continue, the US military announces 5 deaths in Iraq since Friday (3 today), Iraq War veteran Kristoffer Walker says "no more" to the Iraq War, Iraq War veteran Suzanne Swift shares the stories of her harassment and command rape while serving in the military, Baghdad's museum re-opens . . . kind of, and more.
Sarah Rasmussen: Good evening, I'm Sarah Rasmussen and after serving after part of a duty in Iraq, the soldier in Wisconsin has decided not to rejoin his unit and faces possible arrest for that decision. We first told you about Specialist Kristoffer Walker [last] night on WEAU13 News at Six. He's serving with the 353rd transportation company that was supposed to ship out yesterday morning to return to Iraq after a two week leave; however, after his request for a transfer went unanswered by his superiors Walker opted not to return to Iraq for moral reasons Walker, who enlisted in the Army Reserve shortly after September 11, says after six years the US is still fighting a war they should have never been involved with.
Kristoffer Walker: Operation Iraqi Freedom and the war in Iraq, is -- it's an immoral operation and it's also being poorly managed.
Sarah Rasmussen: According to the United States Military, Specialist Walker has 30 days to report. After that he'll be considered a deserter and the military will issue a warrant for his arrest.
Kristoffer explained to Lou Hillman (Fox 11), "My beliefs haven't changed and nothing has changed between Friday and now in Iraq. I am not a pacifist. There is an absolute need for our armed forces" but Kristoffer believes the Iraq War is wrong. As for his opposition and how he should oppose, Kristoffer told Tony Walter (Appleton Post Crescent), "The Army's definition is a little different than mine. The Army's definition is that you have to be opposed to war and all its forms. That's not me. I absolutely support using military force to respond or retaliate to attack. By their standards, you're not allowed to object to one conflict over another." Adam Aaro (WBAY -- link has text video, quote is from video and is correct, text quote is inaccurate) visited with Kristoffer and Sierra Walker and Kristoffer told him, "And I figured if I were to go back to Iraq and do something again that's contrary to my belief structure, I wouldn't be able to really live with myself. . . . Obviously there's a little bit of nervousness there because it's a very real possibility, but what are the other consequences on the flip side if I decide to go back to Iraq and do something that's immoral?" Laura Smith (Fox 11) explains, "Walker says he is receiving suppot from friends and family -- that includes soldiers he served with in Iraq. US Army officials have said Walker still has time to change his mind but would likely face some internal consequences for not reporting." James A. Carlson (AP) reports Kristoffer sees the Iraq War as "an illegitimate, unnecessary campaign." He told WEAU13 that, "Operation Iraqi Freedom and the war in Iraq, is an immoral operation and it's also being poorly managed."
Kristoffer is standing up right now. He knows the Iraq War didn't end. He's not fooling himself into believing it ends tomorrow -- Oh, Blessed Day. Patrick Martin (WSWS) observes, "Meanwhile, there has been no action on Obama's election-year promises to pull out US combat troops from Iraq. Within weeks of the November 4 vote, Obama signaled his intention to maintain the US occupation by retaining Defense Secretary Robert Gates, the architect of the Bush administration's 'surge' policy in Iraq. No US troops have been withdrawn, and US military officers, including the overall commander in Iraq, General Raymond Odierno have dismissed as unviable Obama's pledge to withdraw all combat troops in 16 months." Those in the reality-based world who would like to stand up should know that next month, many people will be standing against the war and organizations participating include The National Assembly to End the Wars, the ANSWER coalition, World Can't Wait and Iraq Veterans Against the War. Here's IVAW's announcement of the March action:
IVAW's Afghanistan Resolution and National Mobilization March 21stAs an organization of service men and women who have served in Iraq, Afghanistan, stateside, and around the world, members of Iraq Veterans Against the War have seen the impact that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have had on the people of these occupied countries and our fellow service members and veterans, as well as the cost of the wars at home and abroad. In recognition that our struggle to withdraw troops from Iraq and demand reparations for the Iraqi people is only part of the struggle to right the wrongs being committed in our name, Iraq Veterans Against the War has voted to adopt an official resolution calling for the immediate withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and reparations for the Afghan people. (To read the full resolution, click here.) To that end, Iraq Veterans Against the War will be joining a national coalition which is being mobilized to march on the Pentagon, March 21st, to demand the immediate withdrawal of troops from Iraq and Afghanistan and further our mission and goals in solidarity with the national anti-war movement. This demonstration will be the first opportunity to show President Obama and the new administration that our struggle was not only against the Bush administration - and that we will not sit around and hope that troops are removed under his rule, but that we will demand they be removed immediately.For more information on the March 21st March on the Pentagon, and additional events being organized in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Orlando, to include transportation, meetings, and how you can get involved, please visit: www.pentagonmarch.org or www.answercoalition.org.
The illegal war is not ending on its own -- no matter how much time you waste "Wishin' & Hopin'". News of US soldiers dying in Iraq continues -- because the illegal war continues and pretending it ended with an election (in the US or Iraq) is something only a Crazy Ass Cockburn would do. Saturday the US miltary announced: "BAGHDAD -- A Multi-National Division--Baghdad Soldier died Feb. 21 while conducting a combat patrol near Baghdad. The Soldier's name is being withheld pending notification of next of kin and release by the Department of Defense. The incident is currently under investigation." Making that announcement was so tiring for M-NF that they allowed the Dept of Defense to make the other one yesterday, "The Department of Defense announced the death of a soldier who was supporting Operation Iraqi Freedom. PFC Cwislyn K. Walter, 19, of Honolulu died Feb. 19 in Kuwait City, Kuwait, of injuries sustained from a non-combat related incident. She was assigned to the 29th Special Troops Battalion, 29th Infantry Brigade Combat Team of the Hawaii National Guard. The circumstances surrounding the incident are under investigation." Today the US military announced: "TIKRIT, Iraq -- Three U.S. Coalition Soldiers and an interpreter died as a result of combat operations in Diyala Province, Iraq, Feb. 23." The announcements bring the number of deaths of US service members in Iraq since the start of the illegal war to 4250.
While 4250 US service members and approximately 1.6 million Iraqis have died, many more people have been injured. Some wounds are physical, some are mental wounds -- all are serious. One woman who fought back against command rape recently discussed that ordeal and the effects she carries with her today. Back in January, we noted IVAW's Suzanne Swift had finally been discharged. Courage to Resist interviewed her (link is audio only) earlier this month about her experiences and this is an excerpt:
Courage to Resist: Suzanne Swift joined the US Army in 2003 having been assured by her recruiter that she would not be deployed to Iraq. But almost immediately after her military police training, Swift's unit was ordered to deploy. Soon after she arrived in the Middle East, Suzanne began having to deal with the sexual advances of superiors. One of those superiors coerced her into a sexual relationship. After she returned to the states, Swift was due to deploy again but she chose to go AWOL instead. Eventually she was arrested and court-martialed and in early 2009, she was discharged from the military. She is talking with us today on the phone from her home in Oregon. Suzanne, thanks so much for speaking with Courage to Resist today. [. . .] Listen, let's go back to 2003, when you decided to join up. Tell me why you enlisted in the first place?
Suzanne Swift: I . . . I don't know. Honestly, it just had a really good recruiting pitch and I didn't have anything else to do and they'd give me a job where they said I wouldn't have to deploy to Iraq which I thought was a really good thing.
Courage to Resist: And the job was in the military police, right?
Suzanne Swift: Right. Military police, one of the most deployed MOSs [Military Occupation Specialties] in the US Army.
Courage to Resist: So would you say they misled you?
Suzanne Swift: Yeah, definitely.
Courage to Resist: So you went to Fort Leonard Wood in Missouri for basic training and for MP training, is that right?
Suzanne Swift: Right.
Courage to Resist: And where was your duty station after that?
Suzanne Swift: I was stationed at Fort Lewis, Washington.
Courage to Resist: How long were you there before you went to Iraq?
Suzanne Swift: I would say about three, maybe four weeks.
Courage to Resist: Oh my goodness, that was fast.
Suzanne Swift: Yeah, it sure was. Kind of a whirlwind.
Courage to Resist: Did you have any troubles during basic or MP training or at Fort Lewis with other soldiers?
Suzanne Swift: No, not really. I had, at Fort Lewis, one squad leader who -- whose intentions were not -- I don't even know how to say that.
Courage to Resist: He - he- he didn't have honorable intentions?
Suzanne Swift: Yeah, exactly -- but that we find out later. Not at Fort Lewis, at Fort Leonard Wood.
Courage to Resist: Oh, that was at Fort Leonard Wood? But he never actually physically assaulted you or anything?
Suzanne Swift: No, not until we got to Iraq.
Courage to Resist: So -- so then you got to Iraq. Now tell me, when did the difficulties start?
Suzanne Swift: Almost immediately. We weren't even too Iraq yet. We were still staging in Kuwait and I had a platoon sergeant proposition me basically for sex and I was just completely in shock because, you know, these people are supposed to be like your parents -- especially when you're brand new, or like a brand new, young soldier. It's really appalling that someone would do that.
Courage to Resist: And how did you respond?
Suzanne Swift: Oh I told him no and then I told a couple of other people what had happened and kind of just like put it out there to see if he'd get any advice back. And I ended up talking to the Equal Opportunity Representative about it and he said that he would -- he would talk to the commander and that he would figure out what to do about it and then nothing ever came of that. Ever.
Courage to Resist: Nothing ever came of it? And did the propositions continue?
Suzanne Swift: Not from that particular person but from another person -- yeah, it sure did.
Courage to Resist: So you went from Kuwait to Iraq and where were you stationed in Iraq?
Suzanne Swift: Karbala, Iraq.
Courage to Resist: And that's where your more serious troubles began, is that right?
Suzanne Swift: Yeah.
Courage to Resist: Do you want to talk about some of that?
Suzanne Swift: Um. I -- it's kind of hard to talk about. I guess I've done it before though. I was basically coerced into a -- into a sexual relationship with -- with my superior. And when I tried to end it -- it went on for a few months -- when I tried to end it, he used every -- every resource he had available to make my life miserable -- to punish me for it.
Courage to Resist: And tell me the ways that he punished you.
Suzanne Swift: He would just -- he would tell me the wrong times to be at somewhere and then punish me for being late or not being at the right place and just do little things that would make me look bad. And he'd like spread rumors about -- about me and then like, I don't know. He just made me look bad in every possible way. And then would punish me for making me look bad.
Courage to Resist: Now what was his position in your unit?
Suzanne Swift: Uh, he was a squad leader. He was in a staff sergeant position but he was as a sergeant as an E-5.
Courage to Resist: So he was your squad leader and as your superior he did everything he could to make your life miserable when you refused to continue the relationship he had coerced you into?
Suzanne Swift: Right.
Courage to Resist: And what did you do about that?
Suzanne Swift: Nothing, honestly, you know, I just kept my head down and tried to stay out of trouble.
Courage to Resist: Did he continue his sexual pursuit of you?
Suzanne Swift: Not once the punishment started, no.
Courage to Resist: Did you ever try to report this?
Suzanne Swift: I told a bunch of people. Look, everybody knew what was going on. Just nobody wanted to fix it and plus what was the point? That was my frame of mind then. And he had -- he had also made it like -- with the way he was treating me -- he made it look like I was just a bad soldier. So even if I had reported it, he could have just told them like, "Oh, she's just not -- because I punish her, she's making it all up."
Courage to Resist: So he really had you in a bind.
Suzanne Swift: Yeah. I mean, I could have reported it but it probably wouldn't have come of anything even if it did, I also would have got in trouble, so what was the point?
Courage to Resist: And this continued all the time you were there?
Suzanne Swift: Mmm-hmm. It stopped right before we were heading back to the States and then he just pretended I wasn't there.
Courage to Resist: Were there any other incidents with your other superiors or was that it?
Suzanne Swift: Yeah, once we got back to the States I moved to a new unit that was standing up and I had a squad leader who -- he didn't proposition me for sex, he would just say little nasty things to me
Courage to Resist: Did you have the sense that he knew about the other situation?
Suzanne Swift: No, I never really thought about it.
Courage to Resist: And the things he said to you, were they sexual innuendos?
Suzanne Swift: Right, he would -- yeah. He was my team leader and he would -- he would just say, he'd call me at night and be like, "What are you wearing?" And like he'd call me for work-related stuff and be like, "Oh, what color of panties do you have on?" Like, "What are you doing right now? Oh, you just got out of the shower? So you're naked right now?"
Courage to Resist: Oh my goodness.
Suzanne Swift: Yeah, he was just a pervy, little guy.
Courage to Resist: Did you report this guy?
Suzanne Swift: I absolutely did. I was in the States and I had been -- I had just been through enough that I was like, "You know what? This guy is not getting away with it."
Courage to Resist: And who'd you report him to?
Suzanne Swift: I reported it to the Equal Opportunity Representative and he did his job for once and took it up higher to the commander.
Courage to Resist: What did the commander do?
Suzanne Swift: They did an investigation during which they accused me of sleeping with him and gave me a class from my commander on how to prevent sexual harassment from happening to me.
Courage to Resist: And they did nothing to the guy that was harassing you?
Suzanne Swift: He got -- he got a very harshly worded letter of reprimand. But that was it.
Courage to Resist: That was it and you were seen as colluding in his sexual aggression. You were treated the way many women are when the victim of sexual aggression is blamed.
Suzanne Swift: Yeah. 'Okay, let me figure out really quick how to prevent sexual harassment -- cause it's my fault when it happens, right?'
The way the military treated Suzanne Swift is appalling and inexcusable; however, it needs to be noted that this is typical and for those who doubt it, zoom in on a class to 'teach' women how not to be sexually harassed which goes to the problems with the military. The person who needs instruction is not the victim. By pushing the burden off on the victim, the military is stating that harassment has two willing parties -- the harasser and the harasseree. As long as they're allowed to push that lie, don't ever expect the culture to improve. And there's no improvement for women in Iraq. Timothy Williams (New York Times) reports 23-year-old Nachman Jaleel Kadhim is a widow who also lost her twin sisters to the illegal war, one of her own five-month twins and now barely surived in a trailer park with "her remaining daughter." Williams notes she's "one of the lucky ones" underscoring how horrible things are for Iraqi widows. Williams tells you the Iraqi economy is hurting but leaves out the puppet government's big-money purchases. Multi-National Forces noted Valentine's Day (their idea of candy and flowers?), "To this end, the Government of Iraq has spent more than $5 billion to buy military equipment, supplies and training from the U.S. through the Foreign Military Sales program." And they're putting in a new pier for the Iraqi navy (yes, that is laughable -- Iraqi navy) which will cost $53 million.
Equally hilarious is to hear the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs managing director (not minister) Leila Kadhim insist that it's impossible to help everyone. Wait, al-Maliki's puppet government cut the meager budget for the Interior of Women's Affairs from $7,500 a month to $1,000 and another ministry wants to whine? That's hilarious. Williams informs you that Iraqi women (ages fifteen to eighty) are widows in a 1 to 11 ratio. It's a growth industry for Iraqi women. Williams notes some widows end up "coerced" into marriage -- but forgets to note that one of al-Maliki's puppets -- a woman at that, Phyllis Schlafly's spiritual sister? -- has proposed governmental programs to force widows into marriages. This one especially should provide laughter, "The Iraqi military estimates that the number of widows who have become suicide bombers may be in the dozens." Which is it? The female suicide bombers -- less than 40 last year -- are young virgins who were raped or they're widows? Pick a narrative, New York Times, because you've insisted both this month. Amazing and typical, Williams report starts talking about raising the profile of women in Iraq and includes the widows mark during the one-two shoe toss and songs sang during the provincial elections but forgets Nawal al Samurrai who resigned (but is reconsidering) this month as the Minister of Women's Affairs when the meager budget for her ministry was cut from $7,500 a month to 1,500 a month. Tina Susman and Caser Ahmed (Los Angeles Times), Corey Flintoff (NPR), To The Contrary's Bonnie Erbe at US News & World Reports, Feminist Wire Daily, wowOwow and Kim Gamel (AP) have covered Nawal. It's only the New York Times -- with all their reporters in Iraq -- who've never managed to file a story on her. wowOwow zooms in on the nonsense Mazin al-Shihan (Baghdad Displacement Committee) gives Timothy Williams (for paying men to marry widows, "If we give the money to the widows, they will spend it unwisely because they are uneducated and they don't know about budgeting. But if we find her a husband, there will be a person in charge of her and her chilrden for the rest of their lives." wowOwow observes, "No wonder the state's not doing enough for women."
No wonder. But a power struggle that took up a great deal of time for the puppet government has been resolved. Wednesday's snapshot noted: "Monday, Steven Lee Myers (New York Times) covered the power struggle between the Ministry for Tourism and Antiquities and the Culture Ministry as to whether or not the museum will open next Monday. The Culture Ministry's Jabir al-Jabiri is stating that the museum is not opening and his ministry is over the Ministry for Tourism and Antiquties while MfTaA's Baha al-Mayahi states yes, they are opening next Monday. Aseel Kami (Reuters) explains today that nothing's changed. MfTaA's maintains that the museum will open Monday and Jaber al-Jaberi continues to insist that it won't and that 'is the official and final position.' Kami observes, 'The feud illustrates some of the challenges facing Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's government as it seeks to capitalise on a drop in violence and unify a country shattered by war'." Today Sameer N. Yacoub (AP) reports, "Iraq's restored National Museum was formally dedicated on Monday, nearly six years after looters carried away priceless antiquities and treasures in the chaos following the U.S.-led invasion." CNN notes that post-war looting resulted in "15,000 irreplaceable artifacts" being lost with "only about 6,000 . . . recovered." Nouri al-Maliki attended the grand opening -- wearing yet another of those tired blue ties he so favors. BBC offers a photo essay on the reopening of the museum. Gina Chon (Wall St. Journal's Baghdad Life) offers this description, "
The museum includes halls displaying items delivered or returned by Iraqi citizens or regained from other nations. There is also an Assyrian room, a hall of Manuscripts showing ancient books of the Quran and an Islamic Hall. Magnificent wall-size stone carvings and statues, ancient coins and glazed pottery were among the antiquities on display. However, a room that had displayed ancient gold jewelry only showed pictures of the treasures. The jewelry had been on display during the early part of the Coalition Provisional Authority, which governed Iraq after the U.S. invasion in 2003. But the museum feared that the gold jewelry may tempt thieves so the pieces are now kept in a vault." Jane Arraf (Christian Science Monitor) explains how the power struggle was resolved, ". . . a compromise: The museum will reopen Monday for the first time in six years. But only eight of the museum's 26 galleries will be accessible, and for only a few hours". The Los Angeles Times' Babylon & Beyond blog informs, "As for when the rest of Iraq will be able to see the museum, that's unclear. Iraqi guards Monday afternoon told journalists it would be a couple of months."
On Iraq's prison-industrial-complex, Dona and Jim observed last night: "More prisons means Iraq needs more prisoners and Tina Susman (Los Angeles Times) reports that Sunni member of Parliament, Mohammed Daini, has been fingered publicly by al-Maliki's puppet government as responsible for an April 2007 bombing of Parliament and many 'other crimes'. As usual, no evidence was produced to back up these assertions though they did whine that the alleged criminal would remain free because member of Parliament have immunity. Immunity apparently also extends to al-Maliki's officials who make charges in public which they cannot back up." Mohammed al Dyni is another spelling. Trenton Daniels (McClatchy Newspapers) quotes the MP responding to the charges today by declaring, "The injustice against us is because of our national positions. We knew that were were going to pay a price for that." He maintains that the confessions the government is trumpeting are false because his bodyguards "were tortured heavily. These confessions need proof." Newsday reports, "As the videos were played, forces surrounded al-Dayni's home in western Baghdad and confiscated weapons, explosives and other items, including the passport of former Sunni lawmaker Abdul Nasser al-Janabi, who was forced out of parliament in 2007 after declaring he would join insurgents. Al-Dayni was at a hotel in the Green Zone, where he was effectively placed under house arrest." Meanwhile Ahmed Rasheed (Reuters) reports on at least 12 Shi'ite police officers being arrested today on violence charges.
Turning to some of today's reported violence . . .
Bombings?
Hussein Kadhim (McClatchy Newspapers) reports a Baghdad roadside bombing "near the Technology University" which left seven people injured, another Baghdad roadside bombing which claimed 2 lives and left four people injured and a Mosul sticky bombing attack on "a candidate of the National Iraqi list" which left the candidate injured.
Shootings?
The Academy Awards ceremony was held last night and Academy Award nominee (for 1979's Starting Over) Candice Bergen live-blogged them for wowOwow. Staying with film, David Zeiger, the director of the amazing Sir! No Sir!, notes that the long suppressed documentary FTA -- directed by Francine Parker and featuring Jane Fonda (back on Broadway in 33 Variations at the Eugene O'Neill Theatre through May 24th -- with Samantha Mathis, Colin Hanks), Donald Sutherland, Holly Near, Rita Martinson, the late Peter Boyle and Paul Mooney among others -- airs tonight on the Sundance Channel (9:00 pm EST). The film Tricky Dick Nixon never wanted America to see not only airs tonight, it can be ordered on DVD.
In US politics, Kimberly Wilder (On the Wilder Side) continues exploring her place in the political landscape, "I still have hopes for the Green Party. But, not patience for them now. As for Cynthia McKinney...I will follow her almost anywhere. And, I intend to help her with her next campaign for any office, with a party I admire, or just dedicated to her and her message."
|
Posted at 03:49 pm by thecommonills
Permalink
Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "Domestic Arts Czar"
Posted at 06:44 am by thecommonills
Permalink
NYT looks at Iraqi widows
Timothy Williams (New York Times) reports
23-year-old Nachman Jaleel Kadhim is a widow who also lost her twin
sisters to the illegal war, one of her own five-month twins and now
barely surived in a trailer park with "her remaining daughter."
Williams notes: That makes her
one of the lucky ones. The trailer park, called Al Waffa, or "Park of
the Grateful," is among the few aid programs available for Iraq’s
estimated 740,000 widows. It houses 750 people.As
the number of widows has swelled during six years of war, their
presence on city streets begging for food or as potential recruits by
insurgents has become a vexing symbol of the breakdown of Iraqi
self-sufficiency.Women who lost their husbands had once been looked after by an extended support system of family, neighbors and mosques.But
as the war has ground on, government and social service organizations
say the women's needs have come to exceed available help, posing a
threat to the stability of the country's tenuous social structures.It's hilarious to hear nonsense about how Iraq's economy is hurting -- yes, Williams offers that. You can check out these headlines at the US Defense Security Cooperation Agency: (BAGHDAD, Iraq, February 15, 2009) Iraqi Army officers attend ethics training in U.S.
(BAGHDAD, Iraq, February 14, 2009) Bringing the U.S. and Iraq closer; Foreign Military Sales strengthens bond between nations
(BAGHDAD, Iraq, February 13, 2009) Modern Pier, Seawall Facility to Benefit Iraqi Navy, Oil Security Equally
hilarious is to hear the Ministry of Labor and Social Affairs managing
director (not minister) Leila Kadhim insist that it's impossible to
help everyone. Wait, al-Maliki's puppet government cut the meager
budget for the Interior of Women's Affairs from $7,500 a month to
$1,000 and another ministry wants to whine? That's hilarious. Williams
informs you that Iraqi women (ages fifteen to eighty) are widows in a 1
to 11 ratio. It's a growth industry for Iraqi women. Williams notes
some widows end up "coerced" into marriage -- but forgets to note that
one of al-Maliki's puppets -- a woman at that, Phyllis Schlafly's
spiritual sister? -- has proposed governmental programs to force widows
into marriages. This one especially should provide laughter, "The Iraqi
military estimates that the number of widows who have become suicide
bombers may be in the dozens." Which is it? The female suicide bombers
-- less than 40 last year -- are young virgins who were raped or
they're widows? Pick a narrative, New York Times, because you've
insisted both this month. Amazing and typical, Williams report
starts talking about raising the profile of women in Iraq and includes
the widows mark during the one-two shoe toss and songs sang during the
provincial elections but forgets the woman below.  That's Nawal al Samurrai. From the Feb. 12th snapshot: And
some say Nawal al Samurrai (also spelled al Samurraie in some press
accounts) should have expected the lack of support as al-Maliki's
Minister of Women's Affairs. But she didn't and thought she would
receive assistance. Instead her ministry's tiny budget was cut further
(from $7500 to $1500 a month). Tina Susman and Caesar Ahmed (Los Angeles Times) quote
Parliamentarian Nada Ibrahim explains, "It's not a real ministry. It's
one room with a woman, no budget, no staff. It's a trick." The
reporters note that the issue "also highlights what many women say is
the lip service paid them by the Shiite conservatives loyal to Dawa and
other Shiite parties dominant in parliament. In August, Inaam Jawwadi,
a female member of parliament from the Shiite bloc, called for
Samarai's ministry to be turned into a Cabinet portfolio, but the
proposal went nowhere." Susman and Ahmed explain, "Her eyes glistened
with tears as she described the frustration of confronting widows and
not being able to fofer them anything beyond promises that she would
try to help. She found herself sitting in her small office appealing to
nongovernmental organizations for money to launch the programs she had
envisioned when she took the position in July." She tells them, "It's
shameful for me in Iraq, a rich country, to have to ask NGOs for
money." To The Contrary's Bonnie Erbe (US News & World Reports via CBS News) proposes,
"Here's an idea: As a start, confiscate the Bush and Cheney family
fortunes, which are voluminous, and use that money to feed the widows
and orphans their war created." Corey Flintoff (NPR -- this is a text only report at NPR) explains,
"Samarraie, a 47-year-old gynecologist and member of parliament, says
that part of the problem is that Iraq is a patriarchal society, where
women are considered adjuncts of their husbands or fathers. And part of
it, she says, is political expediency." Parliamentarian Saleh al-Mutlaq
declares the Shi'ite extremists don't support the women's ministry, "I
mean, it was a joke from the beginning, and they will never support it.
And this poor lady, she was a minister for some time, but she didn't
have any kind of financial support to support women's issues." Flintoff
reports women in Parliament are rallying around the issue, that a five
hour meeting took place among them and that they are determined to
address this leaving Samarrai debating whether or not to withdraw her
resignation. Along with those named above, Feminist Wire Daily, wowOwow and Kim Gamel (AP) have covered Nawal. It's only the New York Times -- with all their reporters in Iraq -- who've never managed to file a story on her. How interesting. Wednesday's snapshot noted: Monday, Steven Lee Myers (New York Times) covered
the power struggle between the Ministry for Tourism and Antiquities and
the Culture Ministry as to whether or not the museum will open next
Monday. The Culture Ministry's Jabir al-Jabiri is stating that the
museum is not opening and his ministry is over the Ministry for Tourism
and Antiquties while MfTaA's Baha al-Mayahi states yes, they are
opening next Monday. Aseel Kami (Reuters) explains
today that nothing's changed. MfTaA's maintains that the museum will
open Monday and Jaber al-Jaberi continues to insist that it won't and
that "is the official and final position." Kami observes, "The feud
illustrates some of the challenges facing Prime Minister Nuri
al-Maliki's government as it seeks to capitalise on a drop in violence
and unify a country shattered by war."Sameer N. Yacoub (AP) reports,
"Iraq's restored National Museum was formally dedicated on Monday,
nearly six years after looters carried away priceless antiquities and
treasures in the chaos following the U.S.-led invasion." Meanwhile, she wasn't good at reading the NEI or the PDB but someone thinks she's can write. AP reports
that former National Security Advisor and former Secretary of State
Condi Rice has signed "a three-book deal with Crown Publishers." The
first book will be a fond look back at her time with the Bully Boy --
in other words, Crown wants her to start off attempting fiction. Below is Condi when the press loved her, May 2, 2005 -- when her every jacket was 'news'!  That was the first The World Today Just Nuts comic Isaiah did. He is now arching his comics at The World Today Just Nuts. Doug notes Press TV's " Chomsky: Obama OKed Israel's Gaza war" (via Information Clearing House): Renowned
US intellectual Noam Chomsky says Barack Obama did not comment on
Israel's war on Gaza, as it was part of the "premeditated" plan. We
have been informed by an Israeli source that the recent invasion of the
Gaza Strip was completely premeditated, Chomsky said in an interview
with the French Al-Ahram daily.The
plan was to deliver the maximum blow to Gaza before the new US
president took office, so that he could put these matters behind him
added the famous intellectual, referring to Obama's pledge to resolve
the Israeli Palestinian conflict.And Mike notes Dennis Loo's " Obama: Bagram Prisoners Be Damned" (World Can't Wait): Contrary
to his public pronouncements about taking the "moral high ground,"
"restoring due process," ending torture, and that "no one is above the
law," the Obama administration declared on February 20, 2009 that the
hundreds of prisoners in Bagram, Afghanistan being held by US forces
and subjected to torture and murder since our invasion of Afghanistan,
do not have the right to challenge their indefinite detentions or the
fact that they have been tortured.They
are, according to this new White House, outside the law that the Obama
team has made such a fetish of claiming that they uphold."This
Court’s Order of January 22, 2009 invited the Government to inform the
Court by February 20, 2009, whether it intends to refine its position
on whether the Court has jurisdiction over habeas petitions filed by
detainees held at the United States military base in Bagram,
Afghanistan," Acting Assistant Obama Attorney General Michael Hertz
wrote in a brief filed Friday. "Having considered the matter, the
Government adheres to its previously articulated position.""Having considered the matter, the Government adheres to its previously articulated position."Having
considered the matter, the Obama administration adheres to the
previously articulated position of the Bush administration, despite the
fact that the legitimacy of the Obama administration, the reason that
so many people were overjoyed to see him elected and to see the Bush
team out of office, was because they thought that Obama was going to
right these wrongs and make things different. Just how wrong this idea
was is becoming clearer by the day to people who are paying attention.Bonnie reminds that Kat's " Kat's Korner: The art of india.arie" went up Sunday as did Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "Al Distraction" -- and we have another comic by Isaiah going up after this. Meanwhile Maria Morani is a Canadian MP. From her Parliament webpage:
MOURANI, Maria, B.A., M.A. Iraq's Foreign Ministry announces:
Mrs.
Maria Morani member of the Canadian Parliament expressed her
willingness to help the Iraqi community living in Canada to overcome
problems in addition to encouraging Canadian investments in the
reconstruction of Iraq.
During the meeting with the Consul
General of the Republic of Iraq in Montreal, Mr. Riyadh Hassoun, Mrs.
Morani called for supporting the formation of an Iraqi- Canadian
Friendship Society to bridge the gap between the two countries through
the Iraqi parliament. The Canadian MP listened to the Iraqi consul's
explaining of the situation in Iraq and the political and security
environment which Iraqis live in. The Kurdistan Regional Government shares a speech by KRG Prime Minister Nechirvan Barzani: PM Barzani's speech at rule of law roundtable  | Erbil, 19 February 2009 Speech by KRG Prime Minister Nechirvan Barzani Roundtable: Ten-year plan to strengthen the rule of law Good afternoon and welcome. I am pleased to participate in this discussion with you about the supremacy of the rule of law. One
of the most important duties of the Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG)
is to strengthen our judiciary and law enforcement mechanisms. We know
that, more than almost any other challenge, failure to address these
matters will hold back progress across a broad range of issues. For
this reason, we are grateful to the United States government for paying
attention to this issue, and working together with us in order to help
us achieve these goals. I consider this
roundtable today to be an important start, but I would like to make a
point about action. In the past five years since the liberation, we
have had many delegations –governments, private sector entities, NGOs
and others – who have come here to discuss important issues with us. We
have held many conferences and meetings on a range of problems. These
meetings have been useful in many areas, but it is also true that
meetings and conferences do not solve problems. So we must move forward
practically, and we should prepare a plan for implementation in order
to achieve our goals. And we would like you to help us in our efforts. I
would hope today that we can also discuss ideas and proposals for
concrete actions that we can take immediately, which can help improve
our performance in the judicial system and the rule of law in the
Kurdistan Region. I will be brief because I am
anxious to hear what others have to say and provide everyone with an
opportunity to contribute to this discussion. Below are six principle
themes upon which I believe we should focus – within the framework of a
comprehensive plan. 1) Training of Judges
We have taken steps to create a more independent judiciary and to give
judges greater freedom and resources to do their jobs without obstacles. Overall,
we have made progress here, and I think our judges are more effective
than they were a few years ago. However, they need more training and
more experience in administering the law. And
we need to begin today to train new lawyers and new judges for the
future. Many of our best judges are old, and we do not have adequate
replacements trained. 2) Simplifying the judicial process
Our judicial process is confusing and complicated, with overlapping
authorities and responsibilities. No average citizen can understand the
system and even some of our lawyers do not understand it. It is a
mixture of several different systems and it works too slowly. We are
not able to follow up individual cases due to the lack of suitable
legal mechanisms, and the bureaucracy in our courts and ministries is
overwhelming. 3) Developing effective investigative skills and technologies
It is true that in our system the courts have substantial investigative
powers, but there should be a comprehensive method to handle these
duties. For example, we do a reasonable job at
investigating routine criminal complaints, but our courts are not at
all capable of following up and investigating crimes of violence
against women. We have made some progress in
developing new skills within our police force, but the courts have
important investigative powers that are not well developed at all. That
is why we must do more in this regard. 4) Updated correctional and prison system
Our prison system is old and in need of repair and renewal. We do not
effectively rehabilitate our prisoners, and too many of them return to
society only to repeat their crimes. Therefore we must develop plans
for social rehabilitation and pay attention to the psychological
conditions within the prisons. 5) Education of the public
We need to pay more attention to public education. Our people need to
be taught, from primary school, to respect the law, courts and the
police. In our colleges there is a need to develop curricula so that
pupils are educated in a progressive way. 6) Cooperation with other regional initiatives
We are aware of initiatives being implemented by the American Bar
Association and the US Government in other countries. It would be of
great benefit to us to be able to liaise with some of these programmes
and to learn from their experiences. For
example, we feel the Jordanian judicial system shares similarities with
ours. Developing training and educational links with our counterparts
in the region would be of immense value to us. We
should all work with civil society organisations and the media in order
to increase the legal awareness of our people in regard to these
issues. This is a subject upon which I have placed a great deal of
importance. And it is a priority in the KRG’s agenda. These
are some of the ideas that I would like to openly discuss with you. I
would like both sides to seriously engage in this issue. Thank you all
for coming and participating in this event. Your efforts are most
appreciated. Thank you. See also the press release on the rule of law round table. The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com. iraqthe los angeles times tina susmancaeser ahmed steven lee myerstimothy williamsthe new york timessameer n. yacoubiraqiraqiraqiraqiraqiraqiraqkats kornerthe world today just nuts
Posted at 06:43 am by thecommonills
Permalink
Kristoffer Walker says no
28-year-old Iraq War veteran Kristoffer Walker is refusing to return to Iraq. WEAU13's " Wisconsin Soldier Refuses To Rejoin Unit In Iraq" has text and video, transcript below for those who can't stream or require closed caption: Sarah
Rasmussen: Good evening, I'm Sarah Rasmussen and after serving after
part of a duty in Iraq, the soldier in Wisconsin has decided not to
rejoin his unit and faces possible arrest for that decision. We first
told you about Specialist Kristoffer Walker [last] night on WEAU13 News at Six.
He's serving with the 353rd transportation company that was supposed to
ship out yesterday morning to return to Iraq after a two week leave;
however, after his request for a transfer went unanswered by his
superiors Walker opted not to return to Iraq for moral reasons Walker,
who enlisted in the Army Reserve shortly after September 11, says after
six years the US is still fighting a war they should have never been
involved with. Kristoffer
Walker: Operation Iraqi Freedom and the war in Iraq, is -- it's an
immoral operation and it's also being poorly managed.Sarah
Rasmussen: According to the United States Military, Specialist Walker
has 30 days to report. After that he'll be considered a deserter and
the military will issue a warrant for his arrest.Dona and Jim noted Kristoffer Walker and WEAU13 last night. (And thank you to them for filling in.) Lou Hillman's " AWOL soldier staying home"
(Fox 11) is a text report on Kristoffer Walker's stand which also
features video of Hillman's report, the transcript of which follows: Mark Leland: An AWOL soldier from Green Bay says he has been ordered to return to duty or face severe consequences .Laura
Smith: Despite that Specialist Kristoffer Walker, a reservists in the
353rd Transportation Company, says he still will not return. Lou
Hillman has more in this Fox 11 follow up.Lou
Hillman: Since notifying his superiors in Iraq about his decision not
to return to duty, Kristoffer Walker says he has received one short
e-mail from the Army warning him of possible consequences. Walker says
he received the e-mail Saturday morning and it reads quote: "Spc.
Walker, . . . You should return to Iraq. Ramifications of not returning
will impact your personal and professional life much longer than four
more months. Please reconsider the actions you are taking wisely."Kristoffer
Walker: My beliefs haven't changed and nothing has changed between
Friday and now in Iraq. I am not a pacifist. There is an absolute need
for our armed forces.Lou
Hillman: But Walker, who enlisted in the Army following the attacks on
9-11, says he believes the Iraq War is immoral. He's in the middle of
his second tour of duty with the army and has been back home on a two
week leave. On Friday, the 28-year-old Green Bay soldier intentionally
missed a return flight saying he will no longer fight in a war he
doesn't believe in. Instead Walker's asking to be reassigned to a local
reserve unit. He says he even came down here to the United States Army
Reserve Center to ask if there are any jobs here that would allow him
to fulfill the terms of his enlistment contract?Kristoffer
Walker: I've stumbled upon a number of roadblocks along the way and
there is no hope for me to believe that by returning to Iraq I would be
able to petition for my transfer out of Iraq.Lou
Hillman: Late last week, however, an Army spokesperson encouraged
Walker to return if he wants any chance of being reassigned.Lt
Col Nathan Banks: Because after thirty days he is dropped from the
rolls so he needs to get back to his so he needs to get back to his
unit and, in fact, work it through the chain there.Lou
Hillman: If Walker remains Absent Without Leave for one month, the Army
would consider him a deserter and he could be arrested. The soldier
says he's taking a stand for what he believes in and is ready to suffer
whatever consequences may come from his decision. In Green Bay, Lou
Hillman, Fox 11 News.Laura
Smith: Walker says he is receiving support from friends and family that
includes soldiers he served with in Iraq. US Army officials have said
Walker still has time to change his mind but would likely face some
internal consequences for not reporting. His unit, the 353rd
Transportation Company, is scheduled to return home this summer.To
really appreciate Nathan Banks' lisping performance ("lisping" is the
only term for Banks' speaking), you have to stream the above report.
Those who can't can just enjoy the dramatics of this statement by
Banks, "His unit is counting on him. He's actually turning his back on
his battle buddies. By just not reporting, you're letting down your
teammates." That and more shows up in most text reports including in
Tony Walter's " Green Bay soldier Kristoffer Walker refuses to return to Iraq" (Appleton Post Crescent) which also includes the following: "The
Army's definition is a little different than mine," Walker said. "The
Army's definition is that you have to be opposed to war and all its
forms. That's not me. I absolutely support using military force to
respond or retaliate to attack. By their standards, you're not allowed
to object to one conflict over another."Walker
enlisted in the Army in 2002 and spent a year in Iraq as an infantryman
beginning in February 2004. When his initial enlistment ended, he
joined the Army Reserve unit headquartered in Buffalo, Minn. The unit
was activated in July and deployed to Samarra, Iraq, in October.Walker said he has been seeking a transfer for several months, contacting elected officials and military personnel."Everyone
drags their feet," Walker said. "I'm a little beyond frustrated. I
signed up to defend the Constitution and defend the country against
foreign enemies. But I'm not going to do something immoral and contrary
to the contract I signed up for. It's really quite sad."WKBT's text and video report is the same and from it we'll note, "Walker has been in the Army for seven years. This is second tour in Iraq." Adam Aaro (WBAY -- link has text video, quote is from video and is correct, text quote is inaccurate) visited
with Kristoffer and Sierra Walker and Kristoffer told him, "And I
figured if I were to go back to Iraq and do something again that's
contrary to my belief structure, I wouldn't be able to really live with
myself. . . . Obviously there's a little bit of nervousness there
because it's a very real possibility, but what are the other
consequences on the flip side if I decide to go back to Iraq and do
something that's immoral?" Next month, people will stand up against the war and organizations participating include The National Assembly to End the Wars, the ANSWER coalition, World Can't Wait and Iraq Veterans Against the War. Here's IVAW's announcement of the March action (which we are trying to note in some way each day between now and March 21st): IVAW's Afghanistan Resolution and National Mobilization March 21stAs
an organization of service men and women who have served in Iraq,
Afghanistan, stateside, and around the world, members of Iraq Veterans
Against the War have seen the impact that the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan have had on the people of these occupied countries and our
fellow service members and veterans, as well as the cost of the wars at
home and abroad. In recognition that our struggle to withdraw troops
from Iraq and demand reparations for the Iraqi people is only part of
the struggle to right the wrongs being committed in our name, Iraq
Veterans Against the War has voted to adopt an official resolution
calling for the immediate withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and
reparations for the Afghan people. (To read the full resolution, click here.)To
that end, Iraq Veterans Against the War will be joining a national
coalition which is being mobilized to march on the Pentagon, March
21st, to demand the immediate withdrawal of troops from Iraq and
Afghanistan and further our mission and goals in solidarity with the
national anti-war movement. This demonstration will be the first
opportunity to show President Obama and the new administration that our
struggle was not only against the Bush administration - and that we
will not sit around and hope that troops are removed under his rule,
but that we will demand they be removed immediately.For more
information on the March 21st March on the Pentagon, and additional
events being organized in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Orlando, to
include transportation, meetings, and how you can get involved, please
visit: www.pentagonmarch.org or www.answercoalition.org. And tonight, on the Sundance Channel, you can see the documentary FTA and/or you can purchase it on DVD (right now, but it is in stores tomorrow). David Zeiger, the director of the amazing Sir! No Sir!, explains: FTA available Tuesday!

Broadcast Premiere Monday, February 23, 9 pm.On the Sundance Channel
Dear Friends and supporters of Sir! No Sir! Why
did FTA disappear 37 years ago? To put it another way, why did a film
featuring Jane Fonda and Donald Sutherland at the height of their
careers, less than a year after their hugely popular film Klute (for
which Jane won the Academy Award for Best Actress), suddenly get yanked
from theaters after only one week? The answer lies in the film
itself, and the turmoil it revealed. 1972 was no ordinary year. It was
the year of Watergate. It was the year of Nixon's horrific, relentless
bombing campaign against the people of North Vietnam. And it was the
year that the rebellion of soldiers and marines against the Vietnam War
spread to the navy and air force. FTA is the film that reveals and
revels in that rebellion in a way that no other film did then or had
for 35 years, until I made Sir! No Sir! Francine Parker, who
directed FTA, swore to me a couple of years ago that Sam Arkoff, the
enigmatic head of American International Pictures, which was
distributing the film, told her he had received a threatening phone
call from the White House-and that is why he pulled the film. Is the
story true? There's no proof, but I can't think of another reasonable
explanation for Sam Arkoff, a man who knew how to wring every penny out
of a film, yanking one starring Jane Fonda and Donald Sutherland from
theaters at a big loss (and, apparently, destroying all of the prints,
since none were ever found). And what happened after that certainly
gives credence to the story. With the yanking of FTA, the story of
the GI Movement against the Vietnam War was also yanked from public
view, and has since been deeply buried under a swath of myths and lies
that poured out of a newly "patriotic" Hollywood in the late seventies
and early eighties. Rambo was just the tip of the iceberg, as the
memory of an illegal, immoral, and hideously deadly war was replaced by
Ronald Reagan's declaration that "The antiwar movement betrayed our
troops." I brought back FTA because I want you to see and feel the
truth. Sadly, Francine Parker died a year ago, before she could see her
film finally get its due. But the film is here. Watch it, and let
yourself feel the electricity of that time. More importantly, ask
yourself what it is about "then" that feels like "now," that speaks
directly to us today. When you listen to Donald Sutherland give his
mesmerizing rendition of the soliloquy from Dalton Trumbo's Johnny Got
His Gun, look around you and ask yourself if anything has really
changed. And while you're doing that, enjoy the film. It's a lot of fun. David Zeiger
Sir!
No Sir! tells the long suppressed story of the GI movement to end the
war in Vietnam. This is the story of one of the most vibrant and
widespread upheavals of the 1960’s- one that had a profound impact on
American society yet has been virtually obliterated from the collective
memory of that time.Click here to order FTA on DVD. Susan notes John Pilger's " Cambodia's Missing Criminals" ( Information Clearing House): The
problem with the United Nations-backed trial of the remaining Khmer
Rouge leaders, which has just begun in Phom Penh, is that it is dealing
only with the killers of Sin Sisamouth and not with the killers of the
family in Neak Long, and not with their collaborators. There were three
stages of Cambodia’s holocaust. Pol Pot's genocide was but one of them,
yet only it has a place in the official memory. It is highly unlikely
Pot Pot would have come to power had President Richard Nixon and his
national security adviser, Henry Kissinger, not attacked neutral
Cambodia, In 1973, B-52s dropped more bombs on Cambodia’s populated
heartland than were dropped on Japan during all of the Second World
War: the equivalent of five Hiroshimas. Declassified files reveal that
the CIA was in little doubt of the effect. "[The Khmer Rouge] are using
damage caused by B52 strikes as the main theme of their propaganda,”
reported the director of operations on May 2, 1973. “This approach has
resulted in the successful recruitment of a number of young men [and]
has been effective with refugees." Prior to the bombing, the Khmer
Rouge had been a Maoist cult without a popular base. The bombing
delivered a catalyst. What Nixon and Kissinger began, Pol Pot completed.Kissinger
will not be in the dock in Phom Penh. He is advising President Obama on
geo-politics. Neither will Margaret Thatcher, nor a number of her
comfortably retired senior ministers and officials who, in secretly
supporting the Khmer Rouge after the Vietnamese had expelled them,
contributed directly to the third stage of Cambodia’s holocaust. In
1979, the US and British governments imposed a devastating embargo on
stricken Cambodia because its liberators, Vietnam, had come from the
wrong side of the cold war. Few Foreign Office campaigns have been as
cynical or as brutal. At the UN, the British demanded that the now
defunct Pol Pot regime retain the "right" to represent its victims at
the UN and voted with Pol Pot in the agencies of the UN, including the
World Health Organisation, thereby preventing it from working inside
Cambodia.Bonnie reminds that Kat's " Kat's Korner: The art of india.arie" went up Sunday as did as did Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "Al Distraction." Isaiah has another comic going up this morning. The Kurdistan Regional Government notes a speech by KRG Prime Minister Nechirvan Barzani: PM's speech at inter-faith religious leaders' conference  | Erbil, 17 February 2009 Speech by KRG Prime Minister Nechirvan Barzani at the conference to support contemporary religious sermons. Ladies and gentlemen, distinguished guests, religious scholars, Good
morning and welcome. I warmly welcome the religious scholars – Muslim,
Christian, Sabae Mandaean and Yezidi – and the scholars of the Kakayie
and Shabak communities, who are gathering at this conference. I am very
pleased to have the chance to meet with you today. I would like to
thank all of you, especially those who have traveled a long way to
attend this conference. Thank you for your efforts to come here. I
very much wanted to meet with you to discuss the important issues and
subjects that our people face. I would like to talk very openly and
frankly so we understand each other better. We all know that,
politically and in terms of security, we have tremendous challenges
ahead of us. However, in addition to local elections, disputed areas,
relations with Baghdad, and several other issues relevant to security
aspects, there are a number of social issues that confront us as well. We
face a number of social concerns in the area of respect for human
rights in general, and respect for ethnic minorities and religious
freedoms. While we try to free ourselves from the effects of decades of
oppression and isolation, we face several obstacles as we try to join
the advanced world. We as the people of Kurdistan have
to be ready to face these challenges and overcome these obstacles;
including corruption, negligence and illiteracy. I
would like to talk openly about the issues of society, religion and
ethnic diversity here in the Kurdistan Region. The challenges that we
have ahead of us are serious. If we allow ourselves to be divided or
separated, there is no doubt that our capability to face these
challenges will be diminished. And we will not be able to succeed at
this delicate stage. In each of these significant
issues, the role of religion and religious leaders is vital. While we
are a diverse society, the overwhelming majority of our people adhere
to the Islamic faith. And many of our laws and customs find their roots
in the religion of Islam. A large number of our people attend mosques
regularly, and our leading religious officials have great influence
throughout the region. The majority of our people try to live a life of
dignity, and to rely on the high values they find in religion, humanity
and society. We in the Kurdistan Regional Government
(KRG), through the Ministry of Endowment and Religious Affairs, have
taken significant steps to serve the respected religious scholars and
improve their living conditions, based on their abilities. And we will
continue our efforts so that the religious scholars, as they were
respected in the past, will continue to be so in the future. And they
will be an effective and respected layer of our community. The
provision of services to the Islamic religious clerics and the
construction and rehabilitation of the holy places are clear evidence
that the KRG has fulfilled the government action plan in this regard,
and is still committed to its promises. Rest assured that this process
will continue and will expand further. Our efforts to
uphold Islam and support the progress of Islamic education are unique
in the countries of the Islamic world. It is the duty of the respectful
religious scholars, in their sermons, prayer sessions and advice, to
work for peaceful coexistence, the love of the homeland, and respect
for each other, as called for by Islam. And not what some others, under
the guise of Islam, are trying to implement, by suspect methods that
create confusion in society. Islamic guidance says love
your brother as you love yourself; which means, what you see for
yourself as just and good, you should see as just and good for your
brother as well. Here the meaning of ‘brother’ is a
brother in religion, a fellow citizen, and somebody with whom you live.
So all of us that live in the Region are brothers and cooperate with
each other. In many different eras, religious scholars
in the Kurdistan Region have been the guides for honesty, sincerity and
the expression of the truth. In the past, they underwent the stages of
Muslim scholarship in the small learning centres of the mosques, under
the guidance of Islamic scholars. They trained for their licenses.
These respectful figures, without receiving anything in return, have
been going to mosques and remote villages to spread the pure message of
Islam: the message of peace, coexistence and tolerance. In
the era of Kurdistan’s September Revolution (from 1961 to 1975), Muslim
and Christian religious scholars played a leading role in their
communities. They delivered humane, patriotic, religious messages and
at the same time embodied the spirit of struggle for liberation. They
were always men of principle in the face of oppression and the coercion
that was exercised against our people. The Religious
Scholars Union founded by the late Mustafa Barzani in the 1960s was
another attempt to foster harmony among religious scholars and speak
with one voice vis-à-vis religious and national issues. At
that time, you struggled and were a source of pride for your people.
Now you carry the same message and are able to play your role in
upholding Islam and spreading feelings of patriotism, humanity and
brotherly coexistence to protecting the Kurdistan Region, freedom and
the interests of our people. During the time of the
former regime, when the villages in the Kurdistan Region were being
destroyed and mosques were being detonated, it was the religious
scholars who took a position and courageously faced these unspeakable
crimes committed against the houses of God, villages and innocent
people. After the uprising, Muslim and Christian
religious scholars and others have had the same attitude and tried to
convey the message of almighty God in the right way. You are a strong
channel for spreading the culture of brotherhood, forgiveness, harmony
and acceptance. We hope that the entire community of
religious scholars, including Imams and preachers of the mosques, in
full reliance on Islam, will encourage Muslims and the entire society
in the Kurdistan Region to conduct itself properly, so that each
individual in this community accomplishes his duty within the framework
of law and order. Islam and other divine religions in
general educate human beings and guide them so that they are faithful,
honest and merciful to their own people. There is an important point
that we should remember at all times. When we were suffering and facing
difficulties, we were all together. The previous regime in Baghdad did
not distinguish among family, tribe, religion and ethnicity in the
Kurdistan Region. And we have all made sacrifices together. The
chemical weapons which were used against our people did not
discriminate among Muslims, Christians, Yezidis, or among Kurds,
Assyrians, Chaldeans, Syriacs, or Turkmen. Or between men, women and
children. Very brutally, according to a well-formulated plan, the
weapons killed everyone. When the economic conditions
were very harsh, it was the same situation for all. Therefore, during
the difficult, unfortunate and fateful times, we were together and we
lived side by side. We have carried the heavy burden of a difficult past together. We
are all partners in sharing a strong hope for a bright future. Today,
whether we are religious, social, political, or economic leaders, we
are all living in a time of which our ancestors dreamt and for which
they struggled and offered sacrifices to make a reality. Only
ten years ago we were in the midst of a very difficult humanitarian
catastrophe. Who would have believed then that in a short period of
time the regime of Baghdad would change, Iraq would be liberated, the
Kurdistan Region would be free, and we would be taking steps toward an
unprecedented period in our history. After the
liberation of Iraq in 2003 large areas of the country, excluding the
Kurdistan Region, became arenas for conflict and the provocation of
sectarian sentiment. Afterwards, terror, suicide attacks and the
killing of civilians followed. The people of the
Kurdistan Region reacted bravely and dealt with the situation. And we
did not allow terrorists, the bearers of fundamentalist ideology and
those who commit acts of destruction under the name of Islam, to
infiltrate our society. We did not allow them to damage the stability
and security of the Kurdistan Region. Christians, Sabae and Mandeans in
Baghdad suffered from terror and violent crimes. Individuals of the
Kurdistan Region in Kirkuk and Mosul were also terrorized and displaced. Terrorism,
suicide killings and the murdering of innocent civilians have never
been a part of the culture of the people of the Kurdistan Region,
Muslim people, or other believers in the Region. Those who tried their
best to bring such acts into our society – acts which are against the
messages of God, the holy Quran, and all divine religions – failed to
do so. This is because our youth have always been wary and understood
the bad intentions of those people. Terrorists at times
have managed to take advantage of some opportunities to commit bombings
and suicide attacks. But relying on the help of our faithful citizens,
the police, security establishment and the Peshmerga forces of the
Kurdistan Region, we have managed to quickly uncover the masterminds
based outside the Kurdistan Region. From now on, we must always be
aware and vigilant, because Iraq and the broader region remain fertile
ground for violence and there is always the possibility of recurrence. Divine
religions carry the message of peace, coexistence and tolerance. In the
history of our people, there have never been any issues or conflicts
between Muslims and other religions in the Kurdistan Region. On the
contrary, all the believers from all the religions in the Kurdistan
Region have lived together as brothers and respect each others’
beliefs. We are pleased that a large community of Christians live in
the Kurdistan Region and have been here since the beginning of
Christianity – long before the emergence of Islam. The
divine religion of Christianity is one of the major religions of the
world today and remains continuously in dialogue with Islam. Today
Assyrian, Chaldean, Syriac, and Armenian Christians are all citizens of
the Kurdistan Region, side by side with us. We in the
Kurdistan Regional Government support the wishes of our people and we
will not allow the valuable religious and social fabric of our people
to be weakened or disintegrate. The sermons of our
religious clerics should be far from violence and distortion, and they
should be objective and contemporary and shed light on religious and
social issues under the umbrella of Islam. And in this regard the KRG
Ministry of Endowments and Religious Affairs supports such an approach. When
I refer to a united stance, I do not mean one particular group or one
political ideology or one specific religion. I refer to a group of
political and religious approaches that have united for the sake of one
aim: developing the Kurdistan Region. We are proud that our Region has
diverse ethnicities and religions. We have been living
together for hundreds of years: Kurds, Assyrians, Chaldeans, Syriacs,
Turkmen, Arabs, Muslims, Christians, Yezidis, and other components of
our society. We have never allowed religious and sectarian differences
to make us weak. In fact, the diversity among us became a source of
strength and power in the Kurdistan Region. When we
were in the mountains during the times of resistance, we were fighting
for our cause - despite the threats of death - and we were hoping for a
bright future. We never asked each other where our neighbour was from
and what religious background he was. What was important at that time
is that we were caring for each other. When someone was in pain and
needed help, we never asked him which mosque or church he attended,
what his ethnic or religious background was, or from which area he
came. Instead, he was offered food, clothing and shelter, and was
treated as a member of the society. He was respected. If
we want to succeed while facing our challenges, we need to work for the
future with the same spirit of tolerance and vision. We must not and
can not allow these issues to separate us or weaken us. It
is our main task in the Region to reconstruct our villages, rebuild our
service infrastructure, improve our educational and health systems, and
revive our agricultural sector. Our job is to reconstruct our society
and rehabilitate our economy. We may wish to help other people outside
the Region, but we do not yet possess the capacity for that; nor do we
find ourselves in the position of power to offer such assistance. History
is full of examples and stories about other countries and regions that
have achieved tremendous progress as a result of the peaceful
coexistence of different groups and religions. Today Malaysia and
Singapore are good examples. Lebanon – for much of its history – and
Nigeria today are also examples because of the tolerant spirit and
coexistence among different groups. The Philippines also has a very
diverse assortment of ethnic and religious groups. Among
other advanced countries, places like Canada, Belgium and Russia have a
history of embracing different ethnicities and religions. Citizens all
live peacefully together and have settled their differences. Even South
Africa, after a century of brutal oppression, now has managed to build
a bridge among the different racial groups and become an economic and
political leader of the African continent. Today, in
the Kurdistan Region we have shown the world an example of religious
and ethnic coexistence and culture, praised by other countries. It
is true that in the history of humanity there are many examples of
differences, and religious and racial oppression. But examples of
peaceful and tolerant coexistence are much more prevalent. If we look
at history we will see that no great society in the world can be
sustained if it is ruled by religious or racial oppressors. Religious
tolerance is the symbol of all civilised and successful societies. The
Universal Declaration of Human Rights very clearly emphasises the fact
that all nations and countries must support religious freedom and
respect the rights of all people to select their religion and worship. Therefore
it is important that all of us in a position of responsibility –
whether religious leaders, political or social leaders, or leaders in
the fields of media, civil society or the private sector – all
emphasise the shared vision for a better and a brighter future. And for
all of us to stand firmly against efforts which aim at discrimination
and mistrust within our society. Therefore I turn to
you today as scholars, men of true faith and worshippers of God. In
order to develop and encourage tolerance, coexistence and ethnic and
religious harmony, let us remember that there is no conflict between
being a good Muslim and being a good neighbour. We can achieve prosperity in the future through respect for our past. We
can firmly sustain and preserve our historical and cultural heritage
while we embrace concepts of modern society and freedom. At the same
time we can respect our religious commitment and respect the religious
commitments of those who worship differently. Distinguished guests, The
important idea is that worshipping God unites us all. We believe in
freedom of religious ceremonies for all faiths. And therefore we must
accept each other as we are, because citizenship unites us all in the
homeland. And accepting each other, respecting each other, and
respecting national, human and religious values are key preconditions
for coexistence. We should not allow and we will not
allow any group, in the name of religion, to use violence against
another group. Holding this conference is a wise step and comes at the
right time. The Ministry of Endowment and Religious Affairs fulfills
its national and religious duty in order to put forth valuable research
and exchanges of views for the sake of modern, religious sermons; and
to further serve the citizens of the Kurdistan Region from the pulpits
of the mosques. Distinguished clerics, As
you know, there was recently a broad international dialogue among the
religions of Islam, Christianity and Judaism in New York. This was the
initiative of His Majesty the King of Saudi Arabia. These efforts are
appreciated. As there is a dialogue among the major religions, there
should be dialogue and understanding within the religions. Members of
the sects of Islam should accept each other as they are, and should
accept each other’s rituals and ceremonies. And within the religions
and the composition of the Kurdistan Region in general, brotherly
dialogue and understanding should spread even further. We
hope that this strong structure that has been in place for hundreds of
years will continue to exist and strengthen the relations between
different ethnicities and religions. And we hope that our religious
clerics will teach coming generations about each other and about
acceptance, tolerance and respect for one another. We
in the government of the Kurdistan Region will continue to support the
efforts of the Ministry of Endowment and Religious Affairs for further
service to the religious clerics. We also support the Ministry of
Endowment and Religious Affairs as it publishes and disseminates books
and pamphlets that combine national and religious sentiments. Based
on our capability, we will be cooperative in striving to employ the
graduates of the Islamic colleges and institutes, according to demand,
as preachers, clerics and teachers in religious schools. We will also
continue to support the Christian religious clerics and the other
religious groups. And we will provide a conducive atmosphere for
students. Finally, I would like to wish you success in
this conference. I hope your research will serve as both a foundation
and a further incentive to expand the religious and ethnic harmony in
the Kurdistan Region. Thank you. See also the press release on the conference to support contemporary religious sermons. The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com. iraqkristoffer walkerweau13sarah rasmusseniraqlou hillmanmark lelandlaura smithtony waltersadam aarojohn pilgerdavid zeigersir! no sir!ftairaq veterans against the wara.n.s.w.e.r.world can't waitkats kornerthe world today just nuts
Posted at 06:41 am by thecommonills
Permalink
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "Al Distraction"
Posted at 10:08 pm by thecommonills
Permalink
And the war drags on . . .
28-year-old Kristoffer Walker is saying no to the Iraq War. James A. Carlson (AP) reports the Iraq War veteran will not be returning to Iraq. He said he now views the Iraq war as "an illegitimate, unnecessary campaign," and he feels that by making him take part, the government broke the contract under which he agreed to defend the U.S. "I feel absolutely justified in doing what I'm doing now based on their breach of the initial contract," he said.WEAU13 reports Walker states, "Operation Iraqi Freedom and the war in Iraq, is an immoral operation and it's also being poorly managed." KARE11 reports pathetic dirt bag Lt Col Nathan Banks is responding to the stand by whining that Kristoffer is "letting his battle buddies down." Hop your ass on over to Iraq, Nathan, if you're so damn worried. And before you do that, let us know all about the hand-to-hand combat you 'brave' spokespeople see while serving in the military. They're just there to try and make the people free,But the way that they're doing it, it don't seem like that to me.Just more blood-letting and misery and tearsThat this poor country's known for the last twenty years,And the war drags on.-- words and lyrics by Mick Softly (available on Donovan's Fairytale) Last Sunday, ICCC's number of US troops killed in Iraq since the start of the illegal war was 4245 and tonight? 4247. Two deaths were announced this weekend, C.I. noted them this morning. Just Foreign Policy's counter finally moved up two weeks ago (after no updates since January 4th) to 1,311,696 killed since the start of the illegal war and finally updating their counter was so much work, they needed to take two weeks off. Jim and Dona here filling in for C.I. We opened with war resistance and we've got a lot more to cover but let's move over to war stupidity. Where there is Iraq War stupidity, there is Patrick Cockburn. It sure is cute to watch Paddy's cock burn with desire for Barack and Nouri. Someone thinks Paddy's a reporter and that's hilarious. The only ones we see praising him at this late date are the ones who aren't even following Iraq -- yeah, Noam Chomsky, we mean you. You offer that reflexive praise to him completely unaware that he hit the breakers in 2007 and has just been cracking up ever since. Paddy cock burn tosses out "Iraq faces a new war as tensions rise in north" today. Does it, Paddy, does it? The north? Really? You're going to stick with that, are you? Reality: In 2008, as C.I. noted here, Mosul overtook Baghdad in reported violence. Reality, while Paddy was running over to Palestine and elsewhere and occassionally dashing into Iraq for a day or two, northern Iraq's violence was obvious for anyone who bothered to look. C.I. was noting it all summer long. C.I.'s continued to note it including this year. Paddy didn't have a word to say, not a peep. Until today. Suddenly, Paddy's alarmed that violence is up in Mosul (even though it started last year). Suddenly, Paddy's on the job. Tell us again, Paddy, about the Iraqi girl who was hanged. You know, the one who was actually stoned. Tell us again, Paddy, how a supposed reporter makes that sort of HUGE mistake and never corrects it. Get the hell off the national stage you big, stupid joke. In more war stupidity, Iraq is not stable. It is not a democracy and it is not a stable. So only a fool would propose that a nuclear power plant be built in Iraq; however, AFP reports they al-Maliki's government is inviting "France to help build a nuclear power plant". (In related news, the Independent of London is promoting nuclear energy in the UK with the lie that it is 'green' and 'safe.') Meanwhile Arwa Damon (CNN) reports that Iraq's "Ministry of Justice has launched a campaign to show" the alleged changes in Abu Ghraib -- more insanity. More prisons means Iraq needs more prisoners and Tina Susman (Los Angeles Times) reports that Sunni member of Parliament, Mohammed Daini, has been fingered publicly by al-Maliki's puppet government as responsible for an April 2007 bombing of Parliament and many "ochter crimes". As usual, no evidence was produced to back up these assertions though they did whine that the alleged criminal would remain free because member of Parliament have immunity. Immunity apparently also extends to al-Maliki's officials who make charges in public which they cannot back up. BBC adds: Iraq's Shia-led government may now seek to have Mohammed al-Daini's immunity revoked after a warrant was issued. Alleged confessions obtained from two bodyguards linked Mr al-Daini to the attack, in which seven people died in a parliamentary canteen. He condemned the bodyguards' arrest and pledged to respond to the accusations.Reuters notes a Mosul roadside bombing that claimed the lives of 2 Iraqi service members and left two more injured, a Baghdad roadside bombing that left four people injured, another Mosul roadside bombing which wounded five Iraqi service members, a Mosul grenade attack which wounded a woman, a Samarra sticky bombing which left "a neighbourhood guard leader" injured, a Tikrit roadside bombing which wounded IIP official Jamal Shaiban and his driver, and dropping back to Saturday a Baghdad roadside bombing which left four people injured and a Baaj bombing that claimed the lives of 5 Iraqi soldiers. Mohammed al Dulaimy (McClatchy) adds provincial election candidate Mohammed Hadi was killed ("in his house") in Babil this Saturday morning. At Third this morning, we offered the following: Truest statement of the weekTruest statement of the week IIA note to our readersEditorial: It's the people's movementTV: Dollhouse is baroque, somebody better fix itGiggles at the smack-down hide the real issueThe sexism at Harper'sI'm ready for my mani-pedi, Mr. DeMilleAnimation roundtableThe continued witch hunt of Senator Roland BurrisSmall change turns to no changeOur celebrity heroFTA TuesdayHighlightsHere, this morning, Kat offered her review of india.arie's great new album, Testimony Vol. 2: Love and Politics. And tonight? We have good news and we have bad news. Isaiah has a new comic. We'll post it after this, you'll love it. The bad news? Isaiah has two comics. You'll have to wait until tomorrow morning to see the next one. It continues the thread of tonight's and you'll really be laughing when you see the one that goes up tomorrow. You just think tonight's comic is funny until you see tomorrow's. Now this is from David Zeiger, director of the documentary Sir! No Sir!: FTA available Tuesday!Broadcast PremiereMonday, February 23, 9 pm.On the Sundance ChannelDear Friends and supporters of Sir! No Sir!Why did FTA disappear 37 years ago? To put it another way, why did a film featuring Jane Fonda and Donald Sutherland at the height of their careers, less than a year after their hugely popular film Klute (for which Jane won the Academy Award for Best Actress), suddenly get yanked from theaters after only one week?The answer lies in the film itself, and the turmoil it revealed. 1972 was no ordinary year. It was the year of Watergate. It was the year of Nixon's horrific, relentless bombing campaign against the people of North Vietnam. And it was the year that the rebellion of soldiers and marines against the Vietnam War spread to the navy and air force. FTA is the film that reveals and revels in that rebellion in a way that no other film did then or had for 35 years, until I made Sir! No Sir!Francine Parker, who directed FTA, swore to me a couple of years ago that Sam Arkoff, the enigmatic head of American International Pictures, which was distributing the film, told her he had received a threatening phone call from the White House-and that is why he pulled the film. Is the story true? There's no proof, but I can't think of another reasonable explanation for Sam Arkoff, a man who knew how to wring every penny out of a film, yanking one starring Jane Fonda and Donald Sutherland from theaters at a big loss (and, apparently, destroying all of the prints, since none were ever found). And what happened after that certainly gives credence to the story.With the yanking of FTA, the story of the GI Movement against the Vietnam War was also yanked from public view, and has since been deeply buried under a swath of myths and lies that poured out of a newly "patriotic" Hollywood in the late seventies and early eighties. Rambo was just the tip of the iceberg, as the memory of an illegal, immoral, and hideously deadly war was replaced by Ronald Reagan's declaration that "The antiwar movement betrayed our troops."I brought back FTA because I want you to see and feel the truth. Sadly, Francine Parker died a year ago, before she could see her film finally get its due. But the film is here. Watch it, and let yourself feel the electricity of that time. More importantly, ask yourself what it is about "then" that feels like "now," that speaks directly to us today. When you listen to Donald Sutherland give his mesmerizing rendition of the soliloquy from Dalton Trumbo's Johnny Got His Gun, look around you and ask yourself if anything has really changed.And while you're doing that, enjoy the film. It's a lot of fun.David ZeigerSir! No Sir! tells the long suppressed story of the GI movement to end the war in Vietnam. This is the story of one of the most vibrant and widespread upheavals of the 1960’s- one that had a profound impact on American society yet has been virtually obliterated from the collective memory of that time.Click here to order FTA on DVD."Wait!" cry European community members, "DVDs have different fields and we need DVDs compatible with the players in our countries!" Yes and, for European community members, Pru notes " Winter Soldier Sir! No Sir! FTA" (Great Britain's Socialist Worker): This is a long awaited chance to get hold of three classic films about the hidden history of US troops in the Vietnam War. Sir! No Sir! was made in 2005 and documents the raging discontent in the US army towards the end of the war. Using archive footage and interviews with ex-soldiers, it records the underground newspapers and subversive coffee houses that sprung up round the US bases. Winter Soldier, filmed in a hotel in Detroit in 1972, shows the harrowing testimony of US soldiers recently returned from Vietnam. Their raw accounts of the atrocities they committed show the brutality of US imperialism. FTA (Fuck The Army) follows actors Jane Fonda and Donald Sutherland presenting their anti-war show to US troops. The film was screened for just a week in the US in 1972 before all prints “disappeared”. Thirty seven years later a copy of the film has been found. It is being released on DVD for the first time. Winter Soldier Sir! No Sir! FTAReleased on DVD by Stoney Road Films To order the films send an email to info@stoneyroadfilms.com or phone 0035 316 678 841. © Socialist Worker (unless otherwise stated). You may republish if you include an active link to the original. Share this story on: Delicious Digg reddit Facebook StumbleUpon If you found this article useful please help us maintain SW by » making a donation. » comment on article » email article » printable versionThe e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com. iraqand the war drags ondonovankristoffer walkerjames a. carlsonweau13the los angeles timestina susmankats kornerthe world today just nutsthe socialist workerthe third estate sunday review
Posted at 10:05 pm by thecommonills
Permalink
Kat's Korner: The art of india.arie
Kat: I never encounter music in the 'normal' sense anymore. Consider it the downfall of Tower Records and others, a shift in the dynamics as the country has moved to downloads or just the company I keep. Take a new song Drew Ramsey has written entitled "Ghetto." "There are places in Havana that remind me of Savannah, parts of West Virginia that might as well be Kenya, parts of New York City, parts of Mississippi, parts of Tennessee look like another world to me . . ." are the lyrics that go over one this great guitar rhythm (one, TWO, three, FOUR, one, TWO, three, FOUR). And I encountered it when Betty's oldest son was playing it. I didn't know the song, thought it was a great one, thought it was so great, it had to be an old one and C.I. was teaching him a classic I'd never heard of. Then Betty blogs Tuesday night (previous link) about the album it's from and I'm reading that half-asleep before calling her to tell her I'll review the album.  It's india.arie and there's no question of arie's talent so between "Ghetto" and Betty's praise for the album, I download it on Amazon Wednesday with a few reservations -- which I'll get too. None of the reservations are about the album itself, Testimony Vol. 2: Love & Politics -- an album which doesn't just easily stand alongside The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill as one of the strongest contemporary soul albums in recent years, it can stand alongside the best of Marvin Gaye's work including, yes, What's Going On?But in three reviews of this fantastic album, I'm not seeing that realization. When I announced I'd be reviewing it, well meaning people started e-mailing me reviews. I read two of those and a third that friend at a local paper passed on in person Saturday afternoon. The reviews left me wondering not just what album they thought they were listening to but whether or not they grasped how autobiographical reviews can be -- even when they're not noting, as I have, the first time they saw a man's cock? Because reviews can be very autobiographical and never more so than when the reviewer attempts to act as if there's some sort of empirical truth he (it's usually a man) has reached that has nothing at all to do with something as variable as opinion. The fellows are never more subjective than when insisting they aren't. Which is how a thread appeared in two of the three reviews: india.arie writes and performs great love songs but she just can't handle the political. This subjective view rests on the assumption that love and politics are not intertwined in india's work -- a view which even the most casual listen to Testimony Vol. 2: Love & Politics should reject. How did the fellows miss that? Maybe because the person who can't handle the political is the reviewers? I'm not sure whether it's not being able to handle the political period or just not being able to handle the political from a woman. But the two guys pushing this mistaken belief tally up the songs and omit a few to 'prove' their point. One of the most obvious songs they ignore is "Pearls." This song, which india performs but did not write, draws no lines between love and politics. Maybe the fact that a variety of love -- and not just love that leads to sex -- is on display confuse the fellows? Maybe when india's singing about the love of a mother for her child, they're bored or just not registering? The mixture of love and politics or the postulate that love can bring about salvation and/or peace is not something india just pulled out of thin air. John Lennon and Marvin Gaye are two whose art has long explored that possibility. In her foot stomping, hand tossing, shake your ass "Better Way" (india's own composition) she insists, "I know there's got to be a (better way)." It's the sort of belief John would flirt with ("Imagine," for example) and Marvin would outright embrace ("Wholy Holy"). Far from being an oddity, india's exploring the mix that some of the strongest artists of the 20th century attempted. Possibly the boys think all 'political' songs need to come with the finger-pointing sneer of early Bob Dylan? Even Dylan doesn't do those songs anymore. He long ago moved on to his end of times and it was up to artists like John and Marvin, Aretha and Janis to offer that some form of salvation might be possible -- in this world or another. When "Better Way" (one of the most amazing and hard driving tracks on the album) ends, we're taken to "Grains." "Grains" is actually three interludes -- tracks one, eleven and fifteen -- which, combined, total less than two and a half minutes and possibly some reviewers felt they were disposable and could be skipped? Here are the lyrics to track eleven: Every human being Who isWho has beenAnd who ever will beFrom the most famousTo the most anonymous, yeahWe're created from the same thingYou know how many hairs are on every headAnd the intention of every heartNo matter the words we saidAnd every time I think I'm separateI remember we're created by one godI'm grateful that You created me from the same grains With the same thingI'm grateful thatYou never cease to amaze meThe way you love meThe reviewers 'seeing' divisions are seeing things india clearly does not. That's obvious throughout the album but especially so with the "Grains" interludes. "Long Goodbye" is clearly a love song . . . and a lot more. Both within the song itself and the context on the album. When John and Marvin explored this type of terrain, critical response is generally silence or some philosophy buff cum music critic will start pontificating about the "exploration of 'the eternal feminine'." It's really funny how they always find men who can explore the so-called "eternal feminine" (that thread comes from philosophy grad students with nothing better to do, they've spent decades now applying it to Nietzsche). A man writes "universal" (read "male") and can also do a a wonderful job exploring (tapping into or just tappin'?) the 'eternal feminine.' Goodness, if they could give birth, they really wouldn't need us at all, now would they? Seriously, when a man walks this terrain, he's applauded for his effort but when a woman does, she's usually not given an iota of artistic credit. Let me move over to my reservations. I bought the album from Amazon Wednesday. It was at the incredible price of $5.99 for the full album (it's currently $8.99 for the entire album -- still a bargain) and I have no idea why downloading from Amazon requires installing their Downloader approximately every fifth download but that's how it's going. Knowing that this community prefers Amazon to iTunes and knowing other people are having to install Amazon's Downloader repeatedly, I'm bringing that up. It matters when you're in a rush to download and think, "Oh, I can do this in mere minutes," but instead find out that you have to (yet again) install the Downloader. So if you're thinking of downloading, factor that into your time management. My other reservation was, "I'm reviewing another album by a woman?" I love female artists. I love male artists. I love groups. I do not attempt to create a ratio of X to Y, but I do hope I give women at least equal footing. If I give more, that's fine. But I was thinking about a drive by e-mail whining that I'd reviewed Tracy Chapman, Schuyler Fisk, Phoebe Snow and Janis Ian this year and the only man was Bruce Springsteen. You know what, not only have I reviewed more women this year, I've also praised them. I don't know where the male artists are? But they're not doing much of anything I can see and appear to have all embraced "the happy idiot" they once longed to be as they pocket "the legal tender." Maybe that'll change as the year continues but the last months of 2008 and the start of 2009 have featured some very strong work by women. And when I look at the three reviews of india.arie's Testimony Vol. 2: Love & Politics, I'm really glad I'm noting these strong artistic contributions by women because they appear to be sailing over the fellows' heads. For india, that's probably okay and the reason is this album doesn't really need critical praise to sell. You can be as small-minded as the bulk of male critics and still fall in love with, for example, "He Heals Me." You can strip all the politics out of it, all the spirituality, reduce it to a 'mere' love song (or is it a 'silly love song'?), and you still can't help moving with the beat or feeling a rush of a joy when india sings "life" in the phrase "cause he's already changed my life" or the way she bends "accepts" right after only to toss it up to a higher register next And joy really describes the entire album. It's what had Betty's son wanting to learn to play "Ghetto" on the guitar, it's how "Better Way" lifts me even when I'm about to fall over, it's there in the album closer "A Beautiful Day." Early in the morningIt's the dawn of a new dayNew hopes, new dreams, new waysI open up eyes and I open up my mindAnd I wonder how life will surprise me today?india.arietestimony vol. 2: love & politicsschuyler fisktracy chapmanjanis ianphoebe snowbruce springsteenthomas friedman is a great mankats kornerthe common ills
Posted at 07:09 am by thecommonills
Permalink
2 more US soldiers announced dead
Yesterday the US miltary announced: "BAGHDAD -- A Multi-National Division--Baghdad Soldier died Feb. 21 while conducting a combat patrol near Baghdad. The Soldier's name is being withheld pending notification of next of kin and release by the Department of Defense. The incident is currently under investigation." Making that announcement was so tiring for M-NF that they allowed the Dept of Defense to make the other one yesterday, "The Department of Defense announced the death of a soldier who was supporting Operation Iraqi Freedom. PFC Cwislyn K. Walter, 19, of Honolulu died Feb. 19 in Kuwait City, Kuwait, of injuries sustained from a non-combat related incident. She was assigned to the 29th Special Troops Battalion, 29th Infantry Brigade Combat Team of the Hawaii National Guard. The circumstances surrounding the incident are under investigation." The announcements bring the number of deaths of US service members in Iraq since the start of the illegal war to 4247. In this morning's New York Times, Sam Dagher offers " Fresh Paint and Flowers At Iraqi House of Horrors." This is not a repeat. Dagher's " With New Name and Mission, the Infamous Abu Ghraib Prison Is to Reopen" ran in yesterday's paper. Today's article is based on the tour of Abu Ghraib he took Saturday. We'll note the jailer's quote (not authorized to speak to the press officially): "It reminds me of the past. I hate this place. It is depressing." And we'll note this section because it's an important of the story of what's taking place in Iraq: In northern Iraq on Saturday, a security official in Mosul said Iraqi forces arrested 75 people during raids on several neighborhoods on the east side of the city. The official said that at least 25 of them were being sought in terrorism investigations. Iraq's antiterrorism law provides wide leeway in arresting and convicting terrorism suspects. Critics say it undermines reconciliation efforts and puts pressure on courts and prisons.New content is going up at Third. Kat's got a review that goes up this morning. There may be a comic tonight. (I'm not sure. A roundtable with Isaiah goes up at Third this morning. I haven't spoken to him since Saturday night/evening -- Ava and I weren't part of the roundtable. At that time, I told him if he wanted to take Sunday off, Kat had a review going up and everyone would understand. I don't know what he ended up deciding.) Remember Jim and Dona are filling in for me tonight with "And the war drags on . . ." Oh, one thing I do know. I asked Isaiah how to link in the comics? His comics here will continue to be a link to his previous comic on his name and we'll note at the end, "Isaiah archives his comics at The World Today Just Nuts." Wednesday's snapshot included: . . . the State Dept denies speaking with Jordan or Turkey about air space or land in the case of a draw down in the near future . . . At the US State Dept today, spokesperson Gordon Duguid was asked if the airspace or land of Turkey and Jordan could be used for US equipment "when the time comes" and Duguid responded, "I am not aware of any discussions on that. I know that the President has asked for a review from the Pentagon on just how you could draw down U.S. forces in Iraq. I am not aware that the review has been finalized, so I would have to refer you to the Pentagon for where that stands at the moment." From Was Duguid out of the looop? AP's Chelsea J. Carter reports, "The American military is shipping battlefield equipment through Jordan and Kuwait, testing possible exit routes in advance of a U.S. withdrawal in Iraq, military officials said." If Duguid was out of the loop, one might wonder why the US military knew what the US State Dept didn't? Next month, people will stand up against the war and organizations participating include The National Assembly to End the Wars, the ANSWER coalition, World Can't Wait and Iraq Veterans Against the War. Here's IVAW's announcement of the March action (which we are trying to note in some way each day between now and March 21st): IVAW's Afghanistan Resolution and National Mobilization March 21stAs an organization of service men and women who have served in Iraq, Afghanistan, stateside, and around the world, members of Iraq Veterans Against the War have seen the impact that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have had on the people of these occupied countries and our fellow service members and veterans, as well as the cost of the wars at home and abroad. In recognition that our struggle to withdraw troops from Iraq and demand reparations for the Iraqi people is only part of the struggle to right the wrongs being committed in our name, Iraq Veterans Against the War has voted to adopt an official resolution calling for the immediate withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and reparations for the Afghan people. (To read the full resolution, click here.)To that end, Iraq Veterans Against the War will be joining a national coalition which is being mobilized to march on the Pentagon, March 21st, to demand the immediate withdrawal of troops from Iraq and Afghanistan and further our mission and goals in solidarity with the national anti-war movement. This demonstration will be the first opportunity to show President Obama and the new administration that our struggle was not only against the Bush administration - and that we will not sit around and hope that troops are removed under his rule, but that we will demand they be removed immediately.For more information on the March 21st March on the Pentagon, and additional events being organized in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Orlando, to include transportation, meetings, and how you can get involved, please visit: www.pentagonmarch.org or www.answercoalition.org.We'll note the following from David Zeiger, director of the amazing Sir! No Sir!: FTA available Tuesday!
Broadcast Premiere Monday, February 23, 9 pm.On the Sundance Channel
Dear Friends and supporters of Sir! No Sir! Why did FTA disappear 37 years ago? To put it another way, why did a film featuring Jane Fonda and Donald Sutherland at the height of their careers, less than a year after their hugely popular film Klute (for which Jane won the Academy Award for Best Actress), suddenly get yanked from theaters after only one week? The answer lies in the film itself, and the turmoil it revealed. 1972 was no ordinary year. It was the year of Watergate. It was the year of Nixon's horrific, relentless bombing campaign against the people of North Vietnam. And it was the year that the rebellion of soldiers and marines against the Vietnam War spread to the navy and air force. FTA is the film that reveals and revels in that rebellion in a way that no other film did then or had for 35 years, until I made Sir! No Sir! Francine Parker, who directed FTA, swore to me a couple of years ago that Sam Arkoff, the enigmatic head of American International Pictures, which was distributing the film, told her he had received a threatening phone call from the White House-and that is why he pulled the film. Is the story true? There's no proof, but I can't think of another reasonable explanation for Sam Arkoff, a man who knew how to wring every penny out of a film, yanking one starring Jane Fonda and Donald Sutherland from theaters at a big loss (and, apparently, destroying all of the prints, since none were ever found). And what happened after that certainly gives credence to the story. With the yanking of FTA, the story of the GI Movement against the Vietnam War was also yanked from public view, and has since been deeply buried under a swath of myths and lies that poured out of a newly "patriotic" Hollywood in the late seventies and early eighties. Rambo was just the tip of the iceberg, as the memory of an illegal, immoral, and hideously deadly war was replaced by Ronald Reagan's declaration that "The antiwar movement betrayed our troops." I brought back FTA because I want you to see and feel the truth. Sadly, Francine Parker died a year ago, before she could see her film finally get its due. But the film is here. Watch it, and let yourself feel the electricity of that time. More importantly, ask yourself what it is about "then" that feels like "now," that speaks directly to us today. When you listen to Donald Sutherland give his mesmerizing rendition of the soliloquy from Dalton Trumbo's Johnny Got His Gun, look around you and ask yourself if anything has really changed. And while you're doing that, enjoy the film. It's a lot of fun. David Zeiger
Sir! No Sir! tells the long suppressed story of the GI movement to end the war in Vietnam. This is the story of one of the most vibrant and widespread upheavals of the 1960’s- one that had a profound impact on American society yet has been virtually obliterated from the collective memory of that time.Click here to order FTA on DVD. The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com. iraqthe new york timessam dagherchelsea j. careterdavid zeigersir! no sir!ftairaq veterans against the wara.n.s.w.e.r.world can't waitkats kornerthe world today just nutsthe third estate sunday review
Posted at 07:07 am by thecommonills
Permalink
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Getting away with fragging
On the front page of today's New York Times, Paul von Zielbauer's " G.I. Offered to Plead Guilty, Then Went Free in Iraq Deaths" which is about Alberto B. Martinez. We've covered Martinez here but we've covered two men named Alberto Martinez so, to be clear, this is not the Alberto Martinez who murdered Richard Davis. Richard Davis joined the US miltary in 1999 and served in Bosnia and Iraq. He was murdered July 14, 2003 by Jacob Burgoyne, Martinez and Douglas Woodcoff. They murdered him because Richard was multi-racial. After beating him and stabbing him over thirty times, they set fire to Richard's corpse. The US military's response was to contact Lanny Davis (Richard's father) and tell him his son must be AWOL. Lanny Davis is the only reason that anyone ever found out that Richard was dead and why and how. The military (as with Maria Lauterbach -- 'disappeared' while pregnant, later found -- by civilian police -- to have been murdered and her corpse was also set on fire) had other things to do. Burgoyne, Matinez and Naverrette were convicted though their punishments are laugghable (Martinez and Naverette are likely to be paroled in two more years). So that's one Alberto Martinzez. But this Alberto Martinez is the one who walked on charges of murdering Lou Allen and Phillip Esposito while the three served in Iraq (Martinez served under the two). June 7, 2005, at their base in Tirkirt, Martinez killed Phillip Esposito with a Claymore mine which wounded Lou Allen. To cover his tracks (to make it appear that base was under attack), Martinez then tossed three grenades. It was "fragging" -- killing a superior officer or officers. Another fragging case took place during the first weeks of the illegal war, Hasan Akbar launched a grenade and shooting attack at Camp Pennslyvania in Kuwait. Fourteen US service members were wounded in the attack and Christopher Seifert and and Gregory Stone were killed. ( Click here for NYT's Stephen Farrell's report on that at NYT's International Herald Tribune.) December 4, 2008, Alberto B. Martinez was aquitted in the murders of Lou Allen and Phillip Esposito causing widow Barbara Allen to exclaim as the verdict was announced, " He slaughtered our husbands, and that's it? You murdered my husband!" Today Paul von Zielbauer reports on the April 3, 2006 confession Martinez signed as part of a plea agreement: "This offer to plea orginated with me. No person has made any attempt to force or coerce me into making this offer." The agreement was also signed by the same two attorneys who represented Martinez. Barbara Allen is quoted by von Zielbauer stating, "They had a conviction handed to them and chose not to take it." The plea would have meant life in prison. Georgetown law professor and former Marine judge Gary D. Solis tells von Zielbauer, "The only reason you should turn this down is if you have an absolutely bulletproof case. I can't imagine why they didn't take it. You've got life in prison in hand." United for Death and Destruction or Leslie Cagan's United for Pathetic and Juvenile (take your pick) gets a mention from Ron Jacobs in his " It Ain't Over 'Til It’s Over: Protest the Occupations and Wars of Washington" ( Dissident Voice): As Barack Obama's troop escalation begins in Afghanistan and talking heads debate how many more troops the US should send, the leadership of what was once the largest antiwar organization (UFPJ) in the United States rejected a call for a unified antiwar protest on March 21st, 2009. Instead, they issued a call to go to Wall Street on April 4th, 2009 and encourage the war profiteers to move "beyond a war economy," while toning down the demand to end the wars and occupations now to a demand to merely end them. Like antiwar organizer Ashley Smith told me in an email: "(That is) something Dick Cheney could support." The implication of this call by UFPJ is that now that Barack Obama and the Democrats are in power, there is no longer any need to protest against war. Not only is this incredibly naive, it is downright dangerous for the future of the world. As anybody who has paid the least bit of attention to the nature of the US economy over the past century, its very foundations rest on the production of war and materials for war. Also apparent to those of us who have been paying attention is that the Democrats are just as responsible for this reality as the Republicans are. Just because George Bush and his administration were personally reprehensible and their arrogance and disregard for principles most Americans hold dear was as obvious as the nose on Pinocchio's wooden face doesn't mean that the policies of the Democrats are substantially different. Consequently, the antiwar movement would be foolish to think they have a government of allies in Washington, DC now. There may be a more personable bunch of folks ruling the country now, but the odds of those folks pulling out of Afghanistan or Iraq now instead of later without a major push from the American people insisting that they do so are about as poor as they were under the Bush administration. The time for the antiwar movement to demand that the Obama administration end the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan is now, before its political ego becomes entangled in a military exercise that is ill-advised, poorly done, and just plain wrong. Jacobs notes that The National Assembly to End the Wars and the ANSWER coalition are among those taking part in the upcoming action. Others include (but are not limited to) World Can't Wait and Iraq Veterans Against the War. Here's IVAW's announcement of the March action (which we are trying to note in some way each day between now and March 21st): IVAW's Afghanistan Resolution and National Mobilization March 21st As an organization of service men and women who have served in Iraq, Afghanistan, stateside, and around the world, members of Iraq Veterans Against the War have seen the impact that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have had on the people of these occupied countries and our fellow service members and veterans, as well as the cost of the wars at home and abroad. In recognition that our struggle to withdraw troops from Iraq and demand reparations for the Iraqi people is only part of the struggle to right the wrongs being committed in our name, Iraq Veterans Against the War has voted to adopt an official resolution calling for the immediate withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan and reparations for the Afghan people. (To read the full resolution, click here.) To that end, Iraq Veterans Against the War will be joining a national coalition which is being mobilized to march on the Pentagon, March 21st, to demand the immediate withdrawal of troops from Iraq and Afghanistan and further our mission and goals in solidarity with the national anti-war movement. This demonstration will be the first opportunity to show President Obama and the new administration that our struggle was not only against the Bush administration - and that we will not sit around and hope that troops are removed under his rule, but that we will demand they be removed immediately. For more information on the March 21st March on the Pentagon, and additional events being organized in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Orlando, to include transportation, meetings, and how you can get involved, please visit: www.pentagonmarch.org or www.answercoalition.org.And Ron mentions Ashley Smith in his article, Smith and Eric Ruder wrote about United for Pathetic and Juvenile decision to be inactive for the next four years in the Socialist Worker back in December. The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com. iraqthe new york timespaul von zielbauerstephen farrellron jacobsashley smitheric ruderiraq veterans against the wara.n.s.w.e.r.world can't wait
Posted at 10:36 am by thecommonills
Permalink
The prison-industrial-complex in Iraq
In a sign of just how quickly the US needs to leave Iraq before it does further damage, consider this sentence: "The government says it sorely needs Abu Ghraib -- now Baghdad Central Prison -- and other detention centers around the country being refurbished with American money because of overcrowding at prisons and continued threats to security, said Safaa el-Deen al-Safi, who was the acting justice minister for almost two years, until Thursday." That's from Sam Dagher's " With New Name and Mission, the Infamous Abu Ghraib Prison Is to Reopen" in today's New York Times. The article's worth reading in full but let's focus on that sentence for a bit. The puppet government needs to reopen Abu Ghraib -- which the US had been running until the human rights violations and war crimes became known. It needs it and other prisons, there is "overcrowding at prisons" and new ones are being built (not noted in this article, but the Times has noted that before, including when Michael Gordon was attempting to 'reassure' about the Iraqi 'justice' system and he noted the makeshift prisons being created). The article tells you that the US still has 14,500 imprisoned Iraqis. Now take that figure and note that approximately 2 million Iraqis have fled the country (external refugees) and approximately 1.6 million Iraqis have been killed since the start of the illegal war. Note that the imprisoned tend to be pre-adult and adult males between the ages of 16 and 45. Note that this grouping is also the same age group that has died in the highest number from violence since the start of the illegal war. Point? Before the start of the illegal war, Iraq was not an oasis of justice. Saddam Hussein was more than happy to imprison large numbers of people (and to torture). Saddam Hussein was a dictator and had an ugly reputation around the world (he wasn't Hitler -- the US didn't install Hitler in Germany). Yet with 3.6 million Iraqis having either fled Iraq or been killed since the start of the illegal war, with a population that trends more female and more young and elderly than prior to the start of the illegal war, with the US imprisoning 14,500 Iraqis, the puppet government still needs more money for prisons and more prisons. And, to be really clear, this isn't all of Iraq. The article's not covering the Kurdistan Regional Government (northern Iraq) because the KRG has their own set up. And also note that the approximately 2 million Iraqi refugees (external) does not take into account the number of Iraqis who left in early waves after the start of the illegal war -- the "brain drain," technocrats, doctors, ect. Yet somehow, as the population numbers have dropped, the central government has a need to imprison even more Iraqis than ever before? No, it doesn't make sense. Yes, Nouri and his thugs do arrest for political reasons. Abu Ghraib existed and was a torture chamber under Saddam Hussein. It's not as though Saddam was some peacenic or softie. Iraqis knew all about injustices and abuses before the start of the illegal war but grasp that things are so out of control in Iraq now that there is more of a need for prisons than under Saddam's rule. Grasp that and grasp the US role in that. The United States needs to pull all troops out of Iraq and do so immediately. Sam Dagher notes how some would prefer to see Abu Ghraib closed and either destroyed completely or turned "into a museum to immortalize Iraqis' suffering." Nouri's bag boy Safaa el-Deen al-Safi (former Minster of Justice -- left that Thursday) nsists, "Yes, this prison has a bad reputation, but this is not an excuse in itself to demolish this prison, given that we need it." That's a curious definition of the term "need." (It's not needed, it's "wanted" by al-Maliki.) Near the end of the article, Dagher discusses of Assad (first name only) and Hassan al-Azzawi who waere imprisoned at Abu Ghraib (while it was under US control) and "is among more than 300 former inmates suing two American contrators, CACI International and the Titan Corporation, for torture and abuse in American courts." Assad's story includes: He said he was made to stand for hours under a freezing cold shower until he collapsed. He was then dragged to the celblock's hallway, where he said he had to crawl naked on the hard floor as he was punched by guards and threatened with rape. Assad, 36, said he was once shackled to his bed for more than a day.And if you're not getting how disgusting the reopening of Abu Ghraib is, check out Kim Gamel's AP report on the re-opening tours being given by "judicial authorities" and puzzle over the insanity of Iraqi Rehabilation Department assisant director Mohammed al-Zeidi's claim, "We turned it to something like a resort not prison." On the topic of refugees, the International Organization of Migration issued the following press release yesterday: Iraq - A continued lack of food, adequate shelter, health care, employment and concerns over security among the more than 1.6 million people internally displaced by the violence that followed the bombing of the Al-Askari mosque in Samarra in 2006, has meant that three years on, their future remains as uncertain as ever without greater humanitarian intervention, says IOM. IOM's annual review of the needs of those displaced by the Samarra bombing on 22 February 2006 finds that although there are by far fewer Iraqis displaced by violence these days, with many governorates having now stopped registration of internally displaced people (IDPs) altogether, their number remains worryingly high. Representing about 5.5 per cent of the Iraqi population, their plight has changed little in the past three years. IOM assessments of 80 per cent of the 1.6 million post-Samarra IDPs show that priority needs remain adequate shelter, food and access to work. The majority of these IDPs (59 per cent) live in sub-standard but expensive rented accommodation, and with the passage of time and without work, their financial resources have dwindled significantly. Others have had to resort to living with host families in overcrowded and difficult conditions while 22 per cent of the IDPs are living in collective settlements, public buildings or makeshift shelters. Some of these are under the constant threat of eviction. With only 16 per cent of all post-Samarra IDPs able to access the homes they left behind, a lack of clean water, sanitation and electricity is a daily reality for the IDPs. The IOM needs assessment also reveals that across the country, 19 per cent of the post-Samarra IDPs still do not have any access to the government's public food distribution system (PDS) upon which much of the Iraqi population is dependent. And with 44 per cent having only occasional access to the PDS, 81 per cent of all the IDPs cited food as a priority need. The health too of the IDPs is of growing concern, particularly due to their precarious living conditions, lack of potable water and sanitation or protection from the elements. Although the vast majority of the displaced say they can access health care, the IOM assessment argues that a lack of qualified staff, medicine and equipment and often damage to medical facilities doesn't ensure the health care is of good enough quality. Conditions for the nearly 297,000 people, including refugees, who have returned to their former homes, are also harsh with people having to cope with damaged property, infrastructure and loss of livelihood. IOM assessments of returnees show that as a result, food, fuel and non-food items feature highly in their needs in addition to health care, employment and clean water. Overall, 61 per cent of all post-Samarra IDPs would like to return to their places of origin but in many cases, they do not have the means to do so to move ahead with their lives, even when the security situation permits. Despite limited funding and insecurity, IOM continues to assist the displaced, returnees and host communities with emergency food, water and household item distributions and community assistance projects. Since 2006, IOM has successfully completed 315 projects in 952 locations with direct costs of over USD 32 million. However, overall assistance to these vulnerable communities remains inadequate. "We and others working on the ground are doing all that we can to help, but the needs are still so great and so diverse. We urgently need a much greater level of humanitarian response and funding to meet the challenges. The future of Iraq depends on the resolution of the displacement crisis," says Rafiq Tschannen, IOM's Chief of Mission in Iraq. "However, the fact that people are returning home, although in smaller than expected numbers, is a positive development which we hope will gather pace." To access the IOM Emergency Needs Assessment report, please go to: www.iom-iraq.net For further information on IDPs and returnees in Iraq, please contact: Martin OcagaIOM Iraq Program ManagerE-mail: ocaga@iom.int or Liana ParisIDP Monitoring ProgramTel: +962 6 565 9660 extensions 1061 and 1033E-mail: lparis@iom.int
The following community sites have updated since early Friday morning: Cedric's Big MixForty belly aches from the fool8 minutes ago The Daily JotTHIS JUST IN! SPIKE'S PRIORITIES!8 minutes ago Thomas Friedman is a Great ManGet yourself right with your daughter, Alice14 hours ago Mikey Likes It!Thumbs up and thumbs down14 hours ago Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitudeno 1 ever believed you, ari14 hours ago SICKOFITRADLZGet yourself right with your daughter, Alice14 hours ago Trina's KitchenEasy pasta salad in the Kitchen14 hours ago Ruth's ReportThe Gamble14 hours ago Oh Boy It Never EndsPretty Poison14 hours ago Like Maria Said PazNatalie Wood, Isaiah14 hours ago Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills)Iraq, Afghanistan14 hours ago The Common IllsIraq snapshot19 hours ago The World Today Just NutsSwingin' John Bolton eyes the U.N.1 day ago The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com. iraqthe new york timessam dagherkim gamelthe world today just nutslike maria said pazkats kornersex and politics and screeds and attitudethomas friedman is a great mantrinas kitchenthe daily jotcedrics big mixmikey likes itruths reportsickofitradlzoh boy it never ends
Posted at 10:35 am by thecommonills
Permalink
|
 |
|
|
|
|