The Common Ills


Monday, September 29, 2008
Iraq snapshot

Iraq snapshot

Monday, September 29, 2008.  Chaos and violence continue, the US military announces another death, the US Secretary of Defense declares no withdrawal happening if Obama or McCain become president, Friday's non-debate and more.
 
Today Basil Adas (Gulf News) covers the continued efforts to of the White House and the puppet government in Baghdad to push through a treaty (circumventing the US Senate and the US Consitution, though the Iraqi Parliament will supposedly be able to give a thumbs up or thumbs down)masquerading as a SOFA. Adas reports that the issue of the immunity of US troops is something the US now signals they're willing to discuss according to the Kurdistan Alliance's Feriad Rawanduz who is hopeful that a treaty can be pushed through before the end of the year. Abdul Aziz al Hakim tells Adas that possibly their could be a judicial body comprised of both Iraqis and Americans who would rule on the actions of individual US service members. Ryan Crocker, US Ambassador to Iraq, is optimistic and claims the 'movement' is some sort of rebuke to Iran (from Iraq).  Adas says the path after a treaty is drawn up is the Executive Board, then the National Security Council and the Iraqi Parliament. Finally, Adas notes: "Meanwhile, Defence Minister Abdul Qader Jasem Mohammad confirmed yesterday that Washington had offered a number of Beechcraft spy planes to bolster the Iraqi security forces."  Iran's Press TV reports that rumors state the White House and the puppet have "settled their main differences over a controversial security agreement."  Nothing was said about the treaty in Robert Wood's press briefing at the US State Dept today nor did Tony Fratto mention it in his White House press briefing today. US Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker has repeatedly blamed the Iranian government for the US failure to control the puppet and did so again in an interview with AP's John Daniszewski where he stated, "The evidence is pretty clear. It is the stream of public statements coming out of Tehran, political and clerical figures, all criticizing the agreement. So they are being very open about their interference."
 
From the treaty to provincial elections.  Last week a bill passed the Parliament that is now awaits a thumbs up or down from the presidency council.  On Sunday, Iraqi Christians took to the streets to protest the bill.   AP noted that "hundreds of Christians staged protests" today in Iraq and those protests were probably most effective on the world stage. al-Maliki's shown no concern for the rights of any of the religious minorities in Iraq; however, the puppet knows that persecution of Christians won't play well with the Americans still supporting the Iraq War so he moved quickly to insist that he supports seats in Parliament being reserved for religious minorities. Sadly, some will play that development out as if it matters. It doesn't matter at all. Parliament voted on the bill, it is sent to the presidency council who will either sign off on it (making it law) or reject it. al-Maliki's way too late to impact anything unless the bill is rejected and the Parliament takes another shot at it.  Reuters notes that al-Maliki's claiming Parliament can add things to the bill.  Well that would actually make it a new bill and not what the full Parliament voted on.  Reuters quotes Iraq's Chaladean Catholic leader, Cardinal Emmanuel III Delly, stating, "I call on the presidency council not to approve the cancellation of article 50 of the provincial law which is an oppression against our presence and representation in Iraqi society."  Shamiram Daniali (Assyria Times) declares, "Just when we thought things cannot possibly go any worse for the most persecuted population of Iraq, its indigenous people who are Assyrian Christians, we witnessed the biggest injustice yet by the Iraqi Parliament."

 
Staying with the weekend, Saturday AFP reported a Jalawla raid by the Iraqi police on the Kuridsh pesh merga and, citing Salah Koikha ("spokesman for the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan"), 1 pesh merga member was killed during the raid. Reuters adds that 1 Iraqi police office officer died.  The raid took place in Diyala Province where the pesh merga has prevented Iraqi forces from enterting certain areas such as Khanaquin (see last Monday's snapshot). India's Economic Times observes, "In a mirror image of Kirkuk, the Kurdish town of Khanaqin near the border with Iran that holds sizeable oil reserves is being exposed to ethnic tensions and rival territorial claims. The local Kurdish political leadership warns that the area could see an ethnic explosion, as they call for Khanaqin to join the adjoining autonomous Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) of northern Iraq."
 
This morning Basil Adas (Gulf News) reported, "Meanwhile, Defence Minister Abdul Qader Jasem Mohammad confirmed yesterday that Washington had offered a number of Beechcraft spy planes to bolster the Iraqi security forces." Vanessa Gera (AP) reports that it was 12 planes and that Mohammed al-Askari, Defense Minister, has confirmed that "six King Air planes had been delivered and the other six were expected soon."  In a possible related item, Aseel Kami (Reuters) reports Iraqi doctors can now pack heat thanks to a new decree from al-Maliki's cabinet. 
 
Violence continued over the weekend and Sundays bombings gathered attention. Reporting on that (and the Iraqi Christians), Tina Susman (Los Angeles Times) observed, "The violence and the protests showed the tensions that still exist in Iraq despite progress on security and political reconciliation. The blasts were particularly jarring because they came around sunset, when the markets are filled with people buying food for the evening meal that breaks their daylong fast during the holy month of Ramadan." Susman quoted bombing victim Hidar Abdulhussein stating, "We are innocent and peaceful people. Why are they targeting markets and shoppers? How were they able to get in? There are so many army and police checkpoints."  Sam Dagher and Muhammed al-Obaidi (New York Times) cite Mizher Abed Hanoush who "echoed concerns voiced by many Iraqis in recent weeks about the fragility of the security situation in Baghdad. 'The situation is turning to the worse again, I do not know why,' he said."  AP notes that the death toll from yesterday's bombings have climbed to at least 35.  Turning to some of today's violence . . .
 
 
Bombings?
 
Hussein Kadhim (McClatchy Newspapers) reports a Baghdad mortar attack which wounded five people, another which wounded three people and a third which wounded one person while a Mosul car bombing left nine people wounded "including 5 Peshmerga members of the PDK."  Reuters notes 1 "Sunni Arab tribal leader died on Monday of wounds inflicted by a bomb attached to his car that exploded on Sunday in Mosul," an Iskandariya roadside bombing that claimed 1 life (three people wounded) and a Samarra roadside bombing that left Samarra Mayor Mahmoud Khalif (and four of his guards) wounded.
 
Shootings?
 
Reuters reports 2 brothers were shot dead in Mosul. Vanessa Gera (AP) reports Sheik Ahmed Salim was wounded in a Diyala Province shooting which also claimed the lives of his 2 sons.
 
Corpses?
 
Hussein Kadhim (McClatchy Newspapers) reports 1 corpse discovered in Baghdad. Reuters notes 1 corpse discovered in Mosul.
 
Reuters notes, "A U.S. soldier was killed by small arms fire when his patrol was attacked in eastern Baghdad, the U.S. military said."
 
Meanwhile, speaking in DC at the National Defense University today, US Secretary Robert Gates joked about the run away defense budget, "Resources are scarce -- and yes, it is a sign I've already been at the Pentagon for too long to say that with a straight face when talking about a half trillion dollar base budget. Nonetheless, we still must set priorities and consider inescapable tradeoffs and opportunity costs."  He further made clear that McCain or Obama, there's no withdrawal from Iraq happening: "In Iraq, the number of U.S. combat units in country will decline over time. About the only argument you hear now is about the pacing of the drawdown. Still, no matter who is elected president in November, there will continue to be some kind of American advisory and counter-terrorism effort in Iraq for years to come."
 
Moving into the US presidential race.  Lynette Long is supporting the McCain - Palin ticket and Long is a feminist.  Bill Clinton cited her last week on ABC's The View and yesterday on NBC's Meet The Press.  At her site, Long compiles a list of reasons as to why Governor Palin is "Good For Women" which includes "keeping the issue of sexism in the United States of America front and center" and expanding "the definition of feminism."  She also writes that following speaking at a McCain - Palin rally, "An executive member of the National Organization for Women contacted me the very next day.  It was a friendly conversation tinted with sarcasm.  'How do you feel about your speech?' she asked me.  'Great.' I responded. 'Why shouldn't I feel great.  I gave a speech about women's rights in front of a large audience.  I highlighted the under-representation of women in every branch of government, the sexism in the media, and the unfair treatment of Hillary Clinton by the Democratic Party.'  'Where did you give your speech?' A rhetorical question deserved a quip answer, 'Before thirty-thousand Americans.'  Republicans are Americans, aren't they.  'By speaking at a McCain-Palin event people will think you are endorsing McCain.'  That's the point, I am endorsing McCain-Palin."  We're starting with this because a number of members of the Cult of Obama are repeating the lie that many 'feminists' have.  (And it will be 'feminists' until they correct that and other lies they've spread.)  'Sarah Palin wants rape victims to pay for their own rape kits!'  Prove it.  September 24th, FactCheck.org published their item on it and they found nothing to prove that rumor.  No proof.  That's how the Cult took down Hillary, they repeated lies and piled on more lies.  Usually, the most effective lie was the one that turned a Hillary strength into a liability -- a strength Barack didn't posses.  So when 'feminists' rush to tell you Sarah Palin hunted wolves from a helicopter, the appropriate response is, "You, ma'am, are a damn liar."  And when they insist that Palin forced rape victims to pay for rape kits, the same reply should be followed by pointing to Barack's "Faith, Family, Values Tour" with headliner Doug Kmiec who is both a homophobe (and actively fighting to overturn marriage equality in California) and an anti-choice advocate who admitted to the New York Times last month that he wanted Roe v. Wade overturned. If 'feminists' think that's feminism, they have more problems than lying.
As the press continues digging around Palin's past can someone help me out here?  I thought during the Democratic Party primaries, when Barack kept suggesting that there was something evil in Hillary and Bill Clinton's tax returns, that Barack himself made a promise.  There was nothing evil in their tax returns as was demonstrated when the Clintons released them.  But didn't Barack promise to release his papers from when he was in the Illinois legislature.  It was hard, he whined, because he didn't have that much money.  Well he's sitting on a large wad of Wall St. money and surely, all these months later, the papers must have been compiled.  Exactly when will he be making them public?
Violet Socks (Reclusive Leftist) explains, "Whenever women in a patriarchal society buck male opinion, there's hell to pay and they know it. Women in America really went out on a limb this year by backing Hillary in the face of withering derision from men (and from young women attempting to curry favor with men, consciously or not). Now they're making amends by piling on Palin.  Ridiculing Sarah Palin as a moron -- which she clearly is not -- is de rigueur for everybody now in the Obama camp. It's their preferred sport. It's true that Palin is verbally awkward in interviews, but then, Obama himself is a man whose unscripted remarks are so ignorant and confused they defy belief. A teleprompter-deprived Obama thinks there are 57 states in the Union, believes Oregon is in the Great Lakes region, doesn't know which states border his own state of Illinois, and has no idea which Senate committees he's on."  And, yes, in response to some e-mails today, the ridicule Palin faces is sexism and just because some self-proclaimed 'feminist' online wants to pretend Tina Fey's sexist (and, yes, bitchy) portrayal of Palin is nothing to fret over doesn't make it so. Staying with stupidity, the  I-stalk-my-ex-and-trash-his-younger (and prettier)-new-partner 'feminist' Katha Pollitt who offered up that Palin was an "affirmative action babe."  First, there's nothing wrong with affirmative action when someone is qualified.  Second, when Katha's sold out feminism (as she freely admitted doing in April) for her hero Barack, maybe calling a candidate an "affirmative action" hire isn't the way to go because Barack's qualifications are non-existant.  Katha wipes the sweat from underneath her many chins, hunkers down at the keyboard and comes up with one falsehood after another.  At one point, she has to drag Carly Fiorina into it because Katha longs for a girlfight (longs for anything that will get her fat ass some attention but it's not 1996 and most stopped reading Katha long ago) so she rushes to type that Carly Fiornia was "ushered off the stage after she pointed out that Sarah Plin couldn't run a major corporation".  Just as Katha has to insist that she was dumped by the one who got away because of his own problems (not the story everyone else heard), Katha has to omit a lot of reality when pretending to talk politics.  CNN quoting Fiorina, "Well I don't think John McCain could run a major corporation, I don't think Barack Obama could run a major corporation, I don't think Joe Biden could run a major corporation."  It must be very sad to be Katha Pollitt.  It's even sadder to have to read her (no link to trash so no link to Katha).  Long after the election's over, feminists will be addressing what went down and Liars for Barack like Katha will be the new Susan Brownmillers (and that's not anything to wish for, read Susan Faludi's Backlash). And since Katha crossed my line-you-do-not-cross (special needs children), let me toss out that each passing day finds Katha looking more and more like Bill Clinton's ugly brother.  And for Katha's friend who sometimes e-mails, ask Katha to watch her words about special needs children before you beg me not to comment on Katha's Butt Ugly-ness. Meanwhile Mollie (Get Religion) explains how the press regularly distorts Palin's religion and, no surprise there, she just had to look to the Los Angeles Times.
 
 
Barack participated in a two-party presidential 'debate on FridaySusan (Random Thoughts) offers this evaluation, "Thank God it's over. I call it a draw; both were equally boring, equally deceptive, equally unfit for the job of president."  Klownhaus notes the Cult reaction and attempts to break it down for TalkLeft's Jeralyn: "Do you want to know what the difference between spinning and outright lying is? There isn't one."  Patrick Martin (WSWS) found the debate underscored "that there is no choice in the 2008 presidential election within the confines of the official two-party system.  Two candidates stood facing each other, espousing nearly identical positions in defense of Wall Street and American militarism which would, in any other country in the world, immediately identify them as representatives of the ultra-right. . . . Obama said that the lesson of Iraq was 'we should never hesitate to use military force, and I will not, as president, in order to keep the American people safe, never hesitate to use military force'."  Asked by moderator Jim Lehrer ("how do you see the lessons of Iraq, Senator Obama?"), Barack responded, "So I think the lesson to be drawn is that we should never hesitate to use military force, and I will not, as president, in order to keep the American people safe. But we have to use our military wisely. And we did not use our military wisely in Iraq."  That was a good catch by Martin and one I honestly missed.  After the question is asked by Lehrer, Barack takes six paragraphs to get that point (six paragraphs according to CNN transcript).  Speaking to PBS' Ray Suarez following the debate (transcript and audio), presidential historian Michael Beschloss noted that "John McCain was repeatedly on the offensive and, to some extent, Obama was on the defensive.  I was surprised by that.  In terms of strategy, we'll see what works.  But oftentimes in debates, if a candidate does go on the offensive, it does tend to work.  That's what Kennedy did in 1960.  It's what Ronald Reagan did in 1980.  And it is what Bill Clinton did in 1992."  PBS' Washington Week did two broadcast on Friday instead of their usual one.  The first was pre-debate (standout there was the Washington Post's Dan Balz reporting from the debate location) and the second was a post-debate discussion.  From the second broadcast:
 
Gwen Ifill: I was struck Michele that Barack Obama didn't seem to have much of an answer to that experience question.
 
Michelle Norris (NPR): I was surprised because it was basically John McCain's closing statement.  He said that he had been involved in virtually every major national security crisis over the last 25 years  and he said directly --
 
Gwen Ifill: He named half the leaders he'd met with.
 
Michele Norris: Yes.  And he said I don't think Barack Obama has the experience or the judgment to be president and Jim Lehrer didn't say anything and basically let Barack Obama respond and the first thing he said was my father came from Kenya It was not directly dealing with that and I was very surprised by that.
 
 

It isn't who won. It's what won.     
Always ask after you watch a debate, not who won, but what lost and what won. 
Militarism won.  
Boondoggle star wars won.   
Corruption won.    
Corporate crime won.    
Bailouts for Wall Street won.  
Nuclear power won.           
Aggressive NATO won.        

What Lost?  
Peace advocates lost. 
Consumers lost. 
Workers lost. 
Solar energy really lost. 
You ought to ask what they don't talk about, what they ignore, what they avoid. Both of these candidates are vying to get into the White House so they can take orders from their corporate paymasters.     
That's what it's all about. Corporate government or the people's government? That's why we're running: to make a people's government. 
When you ask what won you get a clear view that these two candidates are really afraid of challenging corporate power. It's our job to make them more afraid of the people than big business.   
 
Video of Ralph's critique can be viewed here. KPFK broadcast the debates (click here for KPFK archives -- it's Friday under "Special Programming" at 5:03 p.m.) with commentary provided by, among others, Sonali Kolhatkar (host of Uprising) who stated, "I think Obama lost a lot of opportunities to strike back at McCain.  Obama was on the defensive, as you said, Obama sounded like he was on the defensive and overall, I think, the debate was quite a bit more boring than I think most people thought."  The only worthwhile guest not running for office was Chris Hedges who noted of the debate, "A lot of empty talk.  It's pretty clear nothing's going to change in Iraq.  Both candidates are going to ramp up the war in Afghanistan.  Neither of them would address the real issues in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict because their hands are tied by the Israeli lobby and the Israeli government."  You can also laugh at many  crackpots if you listen (Dr. Drew -- and add counting to the many skills Dr. Drew lacks).  You can hear Sonali's co-host Ian Masters -- aka Babbling Brook or maybe just "Trainwreck" -- utilize non-stop sexism in his 'commentary' on this week's debate (the one that hasn't taken place).  It wasn't just enough that he deploy SEXISM against Palin, after Cynthia McKinney was off the air he mocked her and called her "loopy" for her Florida analysis which, for the record, was correct.  Ian Masters is a sexist idiot.  It's pathetic that KPFK aired that embarrassment. It's linked for three reasons.  1) Audio for those who want to listen to the debate.  2) Cynthia McKinney.  3) Ralph Nader.  Sonali asked Cynthia whether she supported the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan and Iraq?
 
Cynthia McKinney: Absolutely, there's no way that -- I think the Democrats and the Republicans are on the wrong track when they say that we need to have more troops in Afghanistan.  No. the people of Afghanistan don't want more missiles, more deaths, more bombs, more violence.  They want peace.  They want justice.  They want self-determination. And that is what the United States ought to be offering the people of Afghanistan.  And they want legitimate government which Ha mad Karzi does not represent.
 
Asked of differences between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, Cynthia replied:
 
Well of course I understand the Democratic Party very well after having served four years in the Georgia legislature as a Democrat and after having served twelve years in the United States Congress as a Democrat.  What I can say is that voters never lose when they vote their values and that is really the message that we should be sending. And for voters who might be torn because of what the corporate press has told them to support -- the corporate political parties about the election of 2000, basically what has been told to voters has been told to them in an effort to prevent them from voting their values because if they voted their values and their values included peace then they would not vote Democrat or Republican, they would vote Green. . . . If their values were social justice, they would not vote Democrat or Republican, they would vote Green.  And what the corporate press has failed to tell us is that the corporate political parties were engaged in the rankest form of disenfranchisement to the tune of one million Black people all over the United States being disenfranchised, being denied the right to have their votes counted in 2000. 78,000 of them were right there in the state of Florida and the Democratic Party did nothing to protect the right of their own voters, which the Black community represents, to have their votes counted. And then in 2004, the further insult was made by John Kerry who made a commitment, a recorded commitment, that we weren't going to see a repeat of 2000 where one million Black people had their votes not counted and then despite the fact that reports were coming in from Ohio of tremendous disenfranchisement in the Black community, John Kerry conceded the very next day.
 
Following McKinney, Aura Bogada (Free Speech Radio News) spoke to Ralph Nader.
 
Ralph Nader: I think something needs to be done for the millions of home owners who are going to be foreclosed.  There are a lot of good ways to save them from losing their homes.  The progressive economist Dean Baker in Washington suggests that they be allowed to rent their homes until the situation is stabilized -- rather than be evicted from their homes, they become tenants so that's one approach.  But by and large the White House has not made the case that there needs to be a gigantic bailout and Congress is not investigating having a series hearing of deliberative hearings the way they did for a tiny bail out of Chrysler in 1979.  So they haven't made the case and if there is to be a bailout they haven't shown what kind of bailout, how much is needed, should it be injection of capital, how do they evaluate the distressed assets, how are they going to pay for it, when are they going to pay for it.  It's nothing but a blank check.  $700 billion. George Bush wants. King George the IV, and that's it.  This is dictatorial rule-making and unfortunately the Democrats with a few tweaks here and there are going to roll over.
 
 

-Demand the absolute moratorium on foreclosures that some people have already envisioned might be needed. 
-Demand a moratorium on apartment evictions. 
-Encourage our friends and neighbors to truly evaluate their resources now, a few days or weeks before something happens: Make a network with 3 or 4 family members. Where would everyone go, who would they live with, if one by one they got kicked out of their homes? 
-Start thinking of laws to propose, or amendments to this bailout bill, that either punish landlords with residential property not rented out, or make squatting rules so simple that there will not be empty apartments rotting around the country, while some people are homeless and looking for a place to lie their head. 
-Start thinking about a way to put a moratorium on the enforcement of "keeping my neighborhood affluent laws" such as in the town I live in, where it is illegal to have a home with two front doors. Or, rules that only one family can live in a home. (Which should be well thought out, I realize. Because, they could be misapplied by bad landlords to overcrowd, or create burdens that make impossible parking/traffic situations if there is not an emergency.)
 
 
We're working that topic back to the presidential election via US House Rep Dennis Kucinich. On Democracy Now! today, he revealed that Barack Obama was said, by House Democrats not to want bankruptcy protection for the home owners: 
 
Amy Goodman: Congressman Kucinich, can you explain how it is that the Democrats are in charge, yet the Democrats back down on their demand to give bankruptcy judges authority to alter the terms of mortgages for homeowners facing foreclosure, that Democrats also failed in their attempt to steer a portion of any government profits from the package to affordable housing programs?    
 
Dennis Kucinich: Well, I mean, those are two of the most glaring deficiencies in this bill. And I would maintain there was never any intention to -- you know, well, many members of Congress had the intention of helping people who were in foreclosure. You know, this -- Wall Street doesn't want to do that. Wall Street wants to grab whatever change they can and equity that's left in these properties. So --   

 
Amy Goodman: Right, but the Democrats are in charge of this.
 
Dennis Kucinich: Right. You know, I'll tell you something that we were told in our caucus. We were told that our presidential candidate, when the negotiations started at the White House, said that he didn't want this in this bill. Now, that's what we were told. 
 
Amy Goodman: You were told that Barack Obama did not want this in the bill?
Dennis Kucinich: That he didn't want the bankruptcy provisions in the bill. Now, you know, that's what we were told. And I don't understand why he would say that, if he did say that. And I think that there is a--the fact that we didn't put bankruptcy provisions in, that actually we removed any hope for judges to do any loan modifications or any forbearance. There's no moratorium on mortgage foreclosures in here. So, who's getting --who's really getting helped by this bill? This is a bailout, pure and simple, of Wall Street interests who have been involved in speculation.
 
Hardly surprising considering where Barack's campaign money comes from.  But see if that gets any more news traction than Biden's speaking error did last week.  Barack and John got to stand on stage in a so-called presidential debate.  Shut out were presidential candidates  Cynthia McKinney, Ralph Nader, Bob Barr and Chuck BaldwinTeam Nader reports that Trevor Lyman is attempting to organize a debate in NYC for McKinney, Nader, Barr and Baldwin as well as (invited even if they don't show) Barack and McCain.  Lyman explains: "Please join us for a third party candidate debate and money bomb (date to be announced as we approach 10,000 pledges mark, location in New York City). All of the major candidates will be invited to participate. The event will be broadcast via BreakTheMatrix.com and many others (details to come). Remember, all of America is on the Internet. Together we can break the media blackout on third party candidates. Be sure to tell your friends and family to tune in." And before any e-mails come in, no, all of America is not online. 
 

Posted at 03:14 pm by thecommonills
 

Kat's Korner: Hold Me Down

Kat's Korner: Hold Me Down

Kat: In a really bad summer of music, there were a few bright spots. Take Augustana. Everything's that missing in Coldplay's Viva La Vida can be found on Agustana's Can't Love, Can't Hurt. Is it art?





It's not anything you'd want to hang on a wall but do most things on your wall get your heart pumping and your ass shaking?


Augustana's "Boston" (heavily featured in Scrubs) put them on the radar but it's the live shows that are putting them on the map.


Can't Love, Can't Hurt is so far beyond 2005's All the Stars and Boulevards that it frequently doesn't even sound like the same group. Seeing them live will only confuse you further. I caught the band live this spring when they were early into their tour and again later this summer when they were a support act. If there's a better arena and shed band to emerge this year, I've missed out. Live the new songs are a little rougher and a lot more thumpin'. So much so that I'm expecting the next album to be another huge leap for the band.


This growth may make listening to the latest CD a disappointment if you catch them live first; however, Can't Love, Can't Hurt provides you with "Hey Now" and "Sweet Low." The first is a rocker (or sounds like it until you hear them perform it live -- again, they're reworking the album on the road). It's also a song lyrically that clues you in: "Chris Martin has entered his Rod Stewart phase but we're making music."


They certainly are. "Sweet and Low" is probably the best written, best performed and best produced track on the CD. "Sweet and Low" is the song that everyone's going to be cited as their favorite song when the next CD carries Augustana to the top ranks. It's got everything a classic rock song needs, the vocal aching with lust, the chords that fire up just when they're needed. Look for millions of women (and probably a a number of men) to claim two or so years from now, "Oh, yeah, Augustana? Back in 2008, I was like 'hold me down'? Oh, yeah, Dan Layus, I'll hold you down all right!"

Anywhere you go, anyone you meet
Remember that your eyes, can be your enemies
I said, hell is so Close, and heaven's out of reach
But i ain't givin' up quite yet
I've got too much to lose
Hold me down, sweet and low, little girl
Hold me down, sweet and low, and I'll carry you home
Hold me down, sweet and low, little girl
Hold me down and I'll carry you home

The rain is gonna fall
The sun is gonna shine
The wind is gonna blow
The water's gonna rise
She said, when that day comes,
Look into my eyes, no one's givin' up quite yet, we've go too much to lose
Hold me down, sweet and low, little girl
Hold me down, sweet and low, and I'll carry you home
Hold me down, sweet and low, little girl
Hold me down and I'll carry you
All the way

"Carry me all the way," Layus sings in that song and the energy completely carries it and the CD. On the slow-tempo "Fire," energy is really all that the band has going for it and they put it across.


If you haven't caught the band live, you'll love Can't Love, Can't Hurt. If you've caught them live, you know they've already moved beyond it. In which case, I suggest you skip the regular version of Can't Love, Can't Hurt and instead purchase the deluxe version which includes four additional tracks -- two are videos. "Hey Now" and "Sweet and Low" acoustic are more than enough, even after sweating through one of their high intensity performances, to get you excited all over again.





coldplay

the common ills

Posted at 06:20 am by thecommonills
 

Kucinich says Barack doesn't want to protect people from bankruptcy

Kucinich says Barack doesn't want to protect people from bankruptcy

Basil Adas' "US ready to discuss immunity clause, Iraqi lawmaker says" (Gulf News) covers the continued efforts to of the White House and the puppet government in Baghdad to push through a treaty (circumventing the US Senate and the US Consitution, though the Iraqi Parliament will supposedly be able to give a thumbs up or thumbs down)masquerading as a SOFA. Adas reports that the issue of the immunity of US troops is something the US now signals they're willing to discuss according to the Kurdistan Alliance's Feriad Rawanduz who is hopeful that a treaty can be pushed through before the end of the year. Abdul Aziz al Hakim tells Adas that possibly their could be a judicial body comprised of both Iraqis and Americans who would rule on the actions of individual US service members. Ryan Crocker, US Ambassador to Iraq, is optimistic and claims the 'movement' is some sort of rebuke to Iran (from Iraq).

Adas says the path after a treaty is drawn up is the Executive Board, then the National Security Council and the Iraqi Parliament. Finally, Adas notes: "Meanwhile, Defence Minister Abdul Qader Jasem Mohammad confirmed yesterday that Washington had offered a number of Beechcraft spy planes to bolster the Iraqi security forces."

The US began a heavy diplomatic push last week. John Daniszewski interviews Crocker for the AP, "US ambassador appeals for patience in Iraq," in which Crocker attempts to portray Iran as the culprit for the lack of a treaty called a SOFA so far:


"If we decide we are tired of it, if we decide we don't want to do it anymore and that it is time to turn our attention to other things, this could all go the other way," Crocker warned. "And it is certainly my sense as someone who has served in the Middle East for the better part of three decades, that you would pay a major long-term price."
He suggested it could be seen as a repeat of the U.S. withdrawal from Lebanon in the early 1980s, a move that led countries like Iran and Syria to draw assumptions about U.S. lack of resolve and to embrace an attitude of defiance. "These kinds of actions have profound and very far-reaching consequences," he said.
The talks on the military pact have hit an impasse recently over U.S. insistence on retaining sole legal jurisdiction over American troops and differences over a schedule for the departure of the U.S. military. Iraqi officials have said that they want all foreign troops out by the end of 2011.
Crocker, 59, who became ambassador in March 2007 and who is expected to leave his post around the end of the Bush administration, is one of the most experienced diplomats in the Middle East. He has served as ambassador in Lebanon, Syria and Kuwait, and was ambassador to Pakistan before his appointment to Iraq.
He said it is becoming obvious that Iran wants the current negotiations to fail.

Today on Democracy Now! (about to start airing), the second segment of the US House Rep Dennis Kucinich interview will find Kucinich revealing that Barack Obama didn't want bankruptcy provisions in the bill to address the economic meltdown. Kucinich says he was told that by a caucus member. Otherwise Democracy Now! is pure Cult of St. Barack, as usual. There are no reps from the campaigns of Ralph Nader, Cynthia McKinney, Bob Barr, Chuck Baldwin or John McCain, nor any supporters of them. Most surprising is the issue of McCain due to the fact Amy Goodman is yet again going after a Barack opponent day after day and never providing them with a means to speak. She did that with Hillary's campaign during the primaries. That's not 'news' and it's not 'public affairs.' It is one-side propaganda. The New York Times' Adam Cohen shows up to push Barack yet again but what else does anyone expect from that paper? And Goody gets in snark at Governor Sarah Palin (McCain's running mate). Asked if she would be willing to go into Pakistan, Palin issues a qualifier (an "If . . . then" statement) and follows the qualifier with "absolutely." Goody renders it as "absolutely" and listen to the self-amused snark in Goody's voice following the playing of the clip.


Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "Boys Do Cry" went up this morning as did Kat's latest CD review, "Kat's Korner: Chris Martin's cold play." Kat's next review goes up after this and I'm grabbing a photo from Wikipedia because I don't have the time to scan the cover this morning. I'll replace it with a scan later in the week.

This is from Team Nader:

Breaking News: Third Party Debate

ShareThisShareThis

Breaking News: Third Party Debate .

Trevor Lyman is the man who organized the Ron Paul money bombs.

One Lyman money bomb raised $4 million in one day.

Another raised $6 million in one day.

Now, Lyman is at it again.

Lyman wants to hold a third party debate in New York City.

Lyman was inspired by Ron Paul's press conference a couple of weeks ago.

At that press conference, Paul called on his followers to ditch the two major parties and throw their support to one of the independent or third party candidates.

So, we all need to support Lyman's push for an alternative debate now.

If Lyman gets 10,000 pledges by October 8, he and the other sponsors will organize a debate in New York City.

All major candidates -- Nader, Barr, McKinney, Baldwin, Obama and McCain will be invited.

Already, with no publicity, Lyman has close to 1,000 pledgers.

So go to thirdpartyticket.com now.

And add your name to the pledge list.

You don't have to say how much you are pledging.

Just add your name.

The Commission on Presidential Debates won't let Ralph debate.

So, let's get behind Trevor Lyman's push now.

Let's crank it up.

And get it done.


Onward to November

The Nader Team

PS:

Third partyticket.com is being sponsored by Lyman's group breakthematrix.com, the Chicago-based Free and Equal Elections, and Open Debates.


ShareThisShareThis

On debates, Lauren notes this from Team Nader:

It Isn't Who Won. It's What Won.

ShareThisShareThis

It Isn't Who Won. It's What Won. .

It isn't who won. It's what won.

Always ask after you watch a debate, not who won, but what lost and what won.



Militarism won.
Boondoggle star wars won.
Corruption won.
Corporate crime won.
Bailouts for Wall Street won.
Nuclear power won.
Aggressive NATO won.


What Lost?
Peace advocates lost.
Consumers lost.
Workers lost.
Solar energy really lost.

You ought to ask what they don't talk about, what they ignore, what they avoid. Both of these candidates are vying to get into the White House so they can take orders from their corporate paymasters.

That's what it's all about. Corporate government or the people’s government? That's why we're running: to make a people's government.

When you ask what won you get a clear view that these two candidates are really afraid of challenging corporate power. It's our job to make them more afraid of the people than big business.


Watch a video of the statement at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WS5Yhy_ySk

ShareThisShareThis



The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.







Posted at 06:18 am by thecommonills
 

Iraq

Iraq

Last night, we noted Tina Susman's "Iraq bombings kill 31" (Los Angeles Times) and in this morning's New York Times, Sam Dagher and Muhammed al-Obaidi offer "Holiday Bombings Kill 27 in Baghdad" (the first report filed from Iraq to make it into the paper since Thursday morning's edition) and on one Baghdad bombing, they note:

Mizher Abed Hanoush, a Shurta resident, said the attack took place near a Shiite house of worship, or husseiniya, now occupied by the Iraqi Army.
Mr. Hanoush said the husseiniya previously had served as the local base of the Mahdi Army militia of Moktada al-Sadr, the anti-American Shiite cleric. It was taken over by the army in the aftermath of battles this year between Iraqi and American forces and the militia in Baghdad and the south.
Mr. Hanoush echoed concerns voiced by many Iraqis in recent weeks about the fragility of the security situation in Baghdad. "The situation is turning to the worse again, I do not know why," he said.

AP notes that the death toll from yesterday's bombings have climbed to at least 35.

Meanwhile, AFP quotes Nouri al-Maliki on the state of the Iraqi military -- or rather, quotes his office quoting al-Maliki -- declaring, "We see that our forces have a high level of capability and this makes us feel proud and honored, but we want the performance to be complete so that they don't need (external) support." The puppet's also in the news for the lack of protections for Iraq's religious minorities in the provincial elections legislation that Parliament voted on last week. Sunday, Iraqi Christians took to the streets in hundreds to protest. "Iraq PM seeks safeguards for Christians" (Reuters) notes that al-Maliki says things need to be added and that the Parliament points out there was no census so they had no hard numbers to work with. al-Maliki's making a show of saying the Parliament needs to fix it when the reality is that bill barely passed last week and a similar bill in July led to walk outs. The article notes:

Iraq's Christian communities, as well as smaller minority sects such as Yazidis in northern Iraq, have tried to stay out of the fray during years of sectarian fighting. But churches have been attacked and two Yazidi villages were struck by truck bombs a year ago in the deadliest strike of the war.
Cardinal Emmanuel III Delly, leader of Iraq's Chaldean Catholics, called for the presidency council to intervene.
"I call on the presidency council not to approve the cancellation of article 50 of the provincial law, which is an oppression against our presence and representation in Iraqi society," he said in a television interview on Saturday.


Shamiram Daniali offers "Iraqi Parliament Betrayed the Persecuted Assyrian Christians" (Assyria Times):

Just when we thought things cannot possibly go any worse for the most persecuted population of Iraq, its indigenous people who are Assyrian Christians, we witnessed the biggest injustice yet by the Iraqi Parliament.
On September 24, 2008, the Iraqi Parliament eliminated article 50 of the Provincial Election Law, which had adopted on July 22, 2008. That article guaranteed the quotas (specific number of seats) in the governorate's regional councils for the minorities, including the Assyrian Christians. The Governorate Council Elections will be held on January 31, 2009.
The bill is now passed to be reviewed and approved by the Iraqi Presidium committee, President Jalal Talabani and his two Vice Presidents. Elimination of the article 50 means that Assyrians, as the indigenous people of Iraq, and other minorities will permanently lose their rights to have representation in the Regional Councils in the 14 regions. For the time being, three regions in northern Iraq (Kirkuk, Arbil and Soleymaniya) will not be holding regional elections.
This gross stump on democracy by the very parliamentarians, who are sworn to bring democracy to Iraq, has caused turmoil among the Assyrians of Iraq. Many of them protested against this bill by holding demonstrations against this post war dictatorship.

Daniali concludes the column with the belief that the bill will be rejected by the presidency council.



Sabina notes something from Team Nader that we'll include in both of this morning's entries:

Breaking News: Third Party Debate

ShareThisShareThis

Breaking News: Third Party Debate .

Trevor Lyman is the man who organized the Ron Paul money bombs.

One Lyman money bomb raised $4 million in one day.

Another raised $6 million in one day.

Now, Lyman is at it again.

Lyman wants to hold a third party debate in New York City.

Lyman was inspired by Ron Paul's press conference a couple of weeks ago.

At that press conference, Paul called on his followers to ditch the two major parties and throw their support to one of the independent or third party candidates.

So, we all need to support Lyman's push for an alternative debate now.

If Lyman gets 10,000 pledges by October 8, he and the other sponsors will organize a debate in New York City.

All major candidates -- Nader, Barr, McKinney, Baldwin, Obama and McCain will be invited.

Already, with no publicity, Lyman has close to 1,000 pledgers.

So go to thirdpartyticket.com now.

And add your name to the pledge list.

You don't have to say how much you are pledging.

Just add your name.

The Commission on Presidential Debates won't let Ralph debate.

So, let's get behind Trevor Lyman's push now.

Let's crank it up.

And get it done.


Onward to November

The Nader Team

PS:

Third partyticket.com is being sponsored by Lyman's group breakthematrix.com, the Chicago-based Free and Equal Elections, and Open Debates.


ShareThisShareThis

And Kayla notes this from Team Nader:

Your Soapbox -- Announcing Freedom Writers

ShareThisShareThis

Your Soapbox -- Announcing Freedom Writers .

Were you disgusted by the sound bite debate you had to endure last night? Did you wish there was someone on stage who was actually addressing substantive issues instead of trading resumes and platitudes? Outraged by the fact that third parties are deliberately and systematically excluded from public discourse and that millions of Americans consequently don't know that they can vote for real reform?

If you are, sign up to join Freedom Writers, the Nader campaign to end media bigotry by demanding that radio, television and newspaper stations cover third party candidates. We need you to help us break through the media blockade and bring real issues and solutions to the people!

Join Freedom Writers today.

Onward.

The Nader Team

ShareThisShareThis



The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.




the los angeles times
tina susman



Posted at 06:16 am by thecommonills
 

Sunday, September 28, 2008
And the war drags on . . .

And the war drags on . . .

Did you hear? The Iraq War is over. It apparently ended Thursday or that's what the New York Times thinks. Thursday was the last day they bothered to print an article filed from Iraq. None Friday, none Saturday and none Sunday. So the illegal war has appparently ended. Or, at least, their attention to it. War is over . . . if like the Times you pretend it is.

Which goes a long way towards explaining how two presidential candidates, both vying for their first term in the White House, can get away with saying that, if elected, they won't end the illegal war by 2013 but, if elected and if American then elects them to a second term, the illegal war MIGHT end.

At least John McCain's not passing himself off as the 'anti-war' choice. But both Barack Obam and John McCain refuse to pledge to end the illegal war, if elected, in their first term. And the peace movement takes it. Used to, the peace movement thought they were being generous with a year to end the illegal war. Now two heavily promoted candidates in the press both argue that if Americans give them their votes, if Americans elect one of them into the White House, for the next four years the illegal war will drag on. But, give them two terms and it might end.

And the most the peace movement can do is hiss at McCain while refusing to call out Barack. Iraqis are frequently quoted stating things in Iraq aren't going to change under McCain or Barack. Iraqis are apparently not only smarter than the US peace movement, they're also more honest.


They're just there to try and make the people free,
But the way that they're doing it, it don't seem like that to me.
Just more blood-letting and misery and tears
That this poor country's known for the last twenty years,
And the war drags on.


-- words and lyrics by Mick Softly (available on Donovan's Fairytale)



Last Sunday, ICCC's number of US troops killed in Iraq since the start of the illegal war hit the 4,168 was the number. And tonight? 4174. Saturday the US military announced: "A Multi-National Division – Center Soldier died of wounds at approximately 1 p.m. as a result of a vehicle rollover accident southeast of Baghdad at approximately 9:28 this morning. The name of the Soldier is being withheld pending next of kin notification and release by Department of Defense." Just Foreign Policy's counter estimates the number of Iraqis killed since the start of the illegal war to be 1,267,401 up from . . . the same as last week. Turning to some of today's reported violence . . .

Bombings?

Mohammed Al Dulaimy (McClatchy Newspapers) reports a Baghdad roadside bombing today which claimed the life of 1 Iraqi soldier and left two more wounded, a Baghdad car bombing claimed 12 lives (thirty-five more wounded) and two other Baghdad car bombings claimed 20 lives with seventy-three more people left wounded, and a Diyala Province roadside bombing left Al Saidiyah mayor Ahmed Samir Zargush and five other people wounded. Saturday McClatchy's Laith Hammoudi reported a Baghdad car bombing that wounded three people (including one police officer).

Shootings?

Mohammed Al Dulaimy (McClatchy Newspapers) reports Iraqi police say the US "shot randomlly" in Baghdad today wounded two Iraqi civilians and 1 Christian was shot dead in Nineveh Province while another man was shot dead in Mosul and his brother left wounded. Saturday McClatchy's Laith Hammoudi reported an armed clash in Jalawla that claimed the life of 1 police officer and 1 "member of Kurdistan Democratic Party."

Corpses?

Mohammed Al Dulaimy (McClatchy Newspapers) reports 2 corpses discovered in Baghdad. Saturday McClatchy's Laith Hammoudi reported 1 corpse discovered in Baghdad.



On today's violence, Tina Susman's "Iraq bombings kill 31" (Los Angeles Times) reports:

The violence and the protests showed the tensions that still exist in Iraq despite progress on security and political reconciliation. The blasts were particularly jarring because they came around sunset, when the markets are filled with people buying food for the evening meal that breaks their daylong fast during the holy month of Ramadan.
"We are innocent and peaceful people. Why are they targeting markets and shoppers?" asked Hidar Abdulhussein, who suffered a broken leg in a bombing at a market in west Baghdad.
"How were they able to get in? There are so many army and police checkpoints," he said, referring to security forces around most major Baghdad marketplaces.

How are they able to get in? One thing in many reports last week was "Awakening" Council members on strike at checkpoints, waiving anyone through, due to the fact that an arrest warrant was said to be out on the member or the member's leader. Susman also notes that Iraqi Christians staged a protest today over the provincial election legislation from last week which "does not guarantee minorities seats on provincial councils." AP notes that "hundreds of Christians staged protests" today in Iraq and those protests were probably most effective on the world stage. al-Maliki's shown no concern for the rights of any of the religious minorities in Iraq; however, the puppet knows that persecution of Christians won't play well with the Americans still supporting the Iraq War so he moved quickly to insist that he supports seats in Parliament being reserved for religious minorities. Sadly, some will play that development out as if it matters. It doesn't matter at all. Parliament voted on the bill, it is sent to the presidency council who will either sign off on it (making it law) or reject it. al-Maliki's way too late to impact anything unless the bill is rejected and the Parliament takes another shot at it.

New content at Third:

Truest statement of the week
Truest statement of the week II
Editorial: What a friend the left has in Barack
A note to our readers
TV: Do Not Disturb The Propaganda
TV: One ticket gets a pass, the other doesn't
The campaign with momentum
Sexism and the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame
TV: The 'debate'
The New Adventures of Old Christine
MyTV's Fascist House: Princess Tiny Meat Chronicles
Coming Up
Highlights


Also, Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "Boys Do Cry" went up this morning as did Kat's latest CD review, "Kat's Korner: Chris Martin's cold play." Pru e-mails to ask if she's greedy to request two highlights? Not at all. First up:

This article should be read after: » Thousands in Manchester to protest against the war
Voices of resistance call for troops to come home
Anti-war demonstrators in Manchester spoke to Sian Ruddick
"If you don't speak up, nothing's going to change," said Falak, a young woman from Liverpool.
"The threats to Iran and the trouble in Pakistan show that this war isn't over. And there's oil and gas pipelines near Georgia. We don't need another war for oil."
Katherine Moffat from Leeds was on her first demonstration. "You hear so much on the news, but I think the people here have a lot to teach people," she said.
Shin Sharma, also from Leeds, added, "We need the unconditional withdrawal of all British and American troops. The main enemy is here at home -- the British state."
Logan McGeary travelled up from north London to join the demo. "I came on the two million strong 15 February 2003 demonstration," she told Socialist Worker. "I didn't believe the lies they told us then – and we've just seen it getting even worse.
"I have nieces and nephews who are in their teens and I don't want them to grow up in a world where war is commonplace or for them to be recruited by the army.
“Regardless of who’s in power, we have to keep up the pressure. The troops are so demoralised. You can't talk about boosting morale in these circumstances. You have to bring them home."
Jesse Oldershaw is a member of the UCU lecturers' union at University College London. "Our success at kicking military recruitment off our campus last year showed me that if you organise you can have a real effect on the world.
"Demonstrations are a show of force -- but they are also a space for organising and discussion. They give people confidence to be together. On the coach here we were all organising the campaign for this academic year."
The following should be read alongside this article: »
Thousands in Manchester to protest against the war
» email article » comment on article » printable version
© Copyright Socialist Worker (unless otherwise stated). You may republish if you include an active link to the original and leave this notice in place.
If you found this article useful please help us maintain SW by »
making a donation.



Pru's second highlight (also from Great Britain's Socialist Worker), is "John Pilger: This conflict is repeating the historical patterns of imperialism:"

Veteran investigative journalist John Pilger is warning that the extension of the Afghanistan war into Pakistan has grim echoes of the past.
"There are striking parallels between US actions in Afghanistan and Pakistan with spread of Vietnam war into Cambodia and Laos," he told Socialist Worker.
"Indeed, there is an historical pattern -- whenever an imperial power gets stuck in one region, it will try to attack another, often disastrously. Caesar and Napoleon did just that.
"The Americans in Vietnam, deeply frustrated by a resistance they never bargained on, sought an easy conquest in Cambodia on a flimsy pretext. That was in 1970.
"The US invasion and carpet bombing of Cambodia acted as a catalyst for the rise and rise of Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge forces. Without US secretary of state Henry Kissinger and president Richard Nixon, Pol Pot would not have succeeded."
The Khmer Rouge emerged out of the chaos of the US war on Cambodia. Their rule was marked by brutality and mass murder. John Pilger warns that the US and its allies could do the same to Pakistan today.
"What George Bush and Dick Cheney are likely to achieve in Pakistan is the rise and rise of the Taliban and the rapid radicalising of 'mainstream' Islamic forces within the country."
Pilger says the impact of these new wars is "likely to favour tough guy John McCain". But he adds, "The longing for relief from war and insecurity in the US cannot be underestimated -- and Barack Obama is likely to be the beneficiary of that, however undeserved."
John Pilger will be presenting his film about Afghanistan, Breaking the Silence, in London on Friday of this week at a Socialist Worker Appeal event. He will be taking questions from the audience after the showing.
One reason why John made a film about Afghanistan was the difficulty of getting serious documentaries onto TV these days.
"In every survey of what the public wants from TV in Britain, the one constant is the demand for documentaries that make sense of the world," says John.
"But TV bosses inevitably perceive ‘public taste’ in relation to 'the market'. Big Brother may be mortally wounded in the ratings, but successors are being planned that are mutations of that form.
"That said, there are some marvellous documentary makers coming up, bypassing TV and heading straight for the cinema -- which is where documentary began."
» email article » comment on article » printable version
© Copyright Socialist Worker (unless otherwise stated). You may republish if you include an active link to the original and leave this notice in place.
If you found this article useful please help us maintain SW by »
making a donation.

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.






mcclatchy newspapers
laith hammoudi
the los angeles times
tina susman



Posted at 11:35 pm by thecommonills
 

Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "Boys Do Cry"

Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "Boys Do Cry"

boysdocry


Isaiah's latest The World Today Just Nuts "Boys Do Cry." Democratic vice presidential nominee Joe Biden declares, tear streaming, "Remember weeping on the campaign trail is okay if you have a penis." [If you're late to the party on the tears, see "TV: Do Not Disturb The Propaganda."]





Posted at 11:16 pm by thecommonills
 

Kat's Korner: Chris Martin's cold play

Kat's Korner: Chris Martin's cold play

Kat: I really fear for Gwenth Paltrow. I don't know her, I'm not a fan. Take out The Royal Tennenbaums and you're left with a slew of movies I'd never see. But there's one role she's likely to be cast in that I wouldn't wish on anyone: modern day Yoko.



Listening to Coldplay's hugely disappointing Viva La Vida, it was obvious that someone was going to have to take the fall and that the day of reckoning loomed. The summer release was tightly embraced and heavily praised by music critics and dee jays desperate for actual music -- that would require playing an instrument. Because the band can actually play instruments, Viva La Vida was said to be the thing we all have a stake in.



A stake in? Like the current economic meltdown, it appears a lot of musical experts were in willful denial. The disappointing Viva La Vida follows up the disappointing X & Y. The only improvement is that the latest album seems to grasp that dynamics are really what put Coldplay over. It wasn't the lyrics. It was the landscape of sound, the peaks and valleys, the hush and roar of various songs. X & Y would have been good album for a band like Bon Jovi that long ago lost its currency. But as the follow up to A Rush of Blood to the Head, X & Y served notice that Coldplay had been hugely overpraised and that the band didn't even grasp what had made it famous.



Viva La Vida can be seen as band members thinking, "If Chris Martin wants to embarrass himself, he's on his own." Martin is singer. Sometimes he plays an instrument and, too often, he's responsible for writing the songs. The last strong song Coldplay recorded was the title track to A Rush of Blood to the Head. "I'm going to buy a gun and start a war . . . if you can tell me something worth fighting for . . ." Chris Martin is one of those artists who, after being primped by various stylists for the photo shoot, really tries hard to show some sort of enlightened pose in the accompanying text. But as various interviews have demonstrated (I'm especially thinking of an embarrassment in Mother Jones that ran several years ago), he can name check but does nothing to indicate depth.



That's the reality of his lyric writing as well. The song I quoted was on an album released in August of 2002 -- before the start of the illegal war. Because many in the US didn't discover Coldplay until after the start of the Iraq War, a few wrongly thought Coldplay was making some form of contemporary comment. All this time later, Martin still hasn't. But look for him to name check sweat shop labor and assorted other issues in the never-ending attempts to prove himself deep.



While no advocate of sweat shop labor, I think you can grasp on one listen to the latest product that Coldplay might benefit musically from a little sweat. On the plus, the band does sound like it's trying and that it's grasped the musical landscape they created on "A Rush of Blood to the Head" was as responsible for that song's lasting impact as were Martin's words. So it's a real shame that the producers (including the increasingly snooze-fest Brian Eno) have worked so hard to destroy any excitement. Viva La Vida not only sports no sweat, it's sterile and heartless. I believe Martin's vocals about as much as I believed Petula Clark really wanted to go to downtown. Like Clark, Martin chirps away in a confectionery manner.



Usually when I think of how sorry the bulk of today's 'popular' music is, I think of the Disney Kids and the damage they've done. But it's equally true that a group like Coldplay creates their own musical landfill. They may, in fact, be more damaging because they're held up as examples and the real question there is: An example of what?



The Rolling Stones, a British band that came along years earlier, could rock out. Even when addressing the world around them in a song like "Street Fighting Man," the Stones could rock out. Coldplay always seems on the verge of about to rock but stalling so Martin's lyric can make some deep point but, like the rocking out, no deep point ever comes. As the dismal recordings pile up, it's hard not to wish that Martin tried less for lofty and was more willing to come up with his own 'stupid girl' songs ("Under My Thumb," et al) because at least that might have some life in it. Somewhere around the half-way mark in the hideous "Lovers in Japan/Reign of Love," I realized Coldplay was all about indications. They lack the ability to actually feel or convey feeling so they indicate. It's like listening to the rock equivalent of America's Next Top Model as the boys try so desperately to be winners but have no grasp of what the prize actually is.



If the whole point of Coldplay was to make Chris Martin a cover boy, consider the band a success. If the point was ever to make music that got you rocking on your feet or on the mattress, they're a failure. Thus far in the 21st century, it appears the marketing of the product is as close to art as music's going to get. The thing about hype is that it always comes back to bite you in the ass and, if Chris Martin doubts that, he should talk to the Knack. At some point in the near future, Coldplay's going to have to face the real critical judgment. When that day comes and a fall guy's needed, the easy target will probably be the actress Gwyneth Paltrow. However, assuming Gwyneth corrupted Chris requires that you first buy into the belief that he had originally had something worth offering. For the second album in a row, Viva La Vida argues that was never the case.

coldplay

the common ills

Posted at 11:11 pm by thecommonills
 

Saturday, September 27, 2008
Pesh merga

Pesh merga

AFP reports that Jalawla today was the site of a raid by the Iraqi police on the Kuridsh pesh merga and, citing Salah Koikha ("spokesman for the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan"), 1 pesh merga member was killed during the raid. Reuters adds that 1 Iraqi police office officer died.





The raid took place in Diyala Province where the pesh merga has prevented Iraqi forces from enterting certain areas such as Khanaquin (see Monday's snapshot). From India's Economic Times' "Oil wealth fans ethnic flames in Iraqi town:"





In a mirror image of Kirkuk, the Kurdish town of Khanaqin near the border with Iran that holds sizeable oil reserves is being exposed to ethnic tensions and rival territorial claims. The local Kurdish political leadership warns that the area could see an ethnic explosion, as they call for Khanaqin to join the adjoining autonomous Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) of northern Iraq.


They want to rebuild the town through the international oil boom. "What we are telling the government is simple. Implement the constitutional provision for a referendum for people in Khanaqin to decide their future," said Mala Bakhtyar, a senior member of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), the Kurdish political party of Iraq's President Jalal Talabani.


"If they don't do that, then there will be political trouble and military trouble. Yes, there will be an explosion of violence," he told a journalist touring the town in Diyala province. Along the 170-kilometre (110-mile) road from Baghdad to Khanaqin are grim reminders of trouble.


The New York Times takes the second day in print off from Iraq. Which is all the more hilarious when you consider the never-writes-about-Iraq Gail Collins shows up with an insufferable column today where she briefly marvels over how Iraq has fallen off the radar.

In some of today's violence, Reuters notes a Mosul car bombing that claimed 1 life, a Baghdad roadside bombing that injured one police officer, Iraqi soldiers shot dead 2 suspects in Mosul and a shooting attack on "a member of Baaj local council and his wife" in which the man wounded.


The following community sites have updated since Friday morning:

Rebecca's Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude;

Betty's Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man;

Cedric's Cedric's Big Mix;

Kat's Kat's Korner;

Mike's Mikey Likes It!;

Elaine's Like Maria Said Paz;

Wally's The Daily Jot;

Trina's Trina's Kitchen;

Ruth's Ruth's Report;

and Marcia's SICKOFITRADLZ




The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.



iraq

the new york times

thomas friedman is a great man

Posted at 11:07 pm by thecommonills
 

Friday, September 26, 2008
Iraq snapshot

Iraq snapshot

Friday, September 26, 2008.  Chaos and violence continue, the US military announced another death, did the Obama-Biden plan for Iraq slip out accidentally, and more.
 
Starting in Iraq.  The Parliament passed a bill for provincial elections that now awaits approval (or rejection) by the presidency council.  This afternoon, the New York Times' Eric Owles posted at Baghdad Bureau an audio conversation between the paper's Iraq-based correspondents Alissa J. Rubin and Stephen Farrell discussing the bill.  Excerpt:
 
Alissa J. Rubin: Well they were under pressure to pass a law actually three or four months ago.  The idea had originally been -- and the requirement was that they would hold provincial  elections by Oct. 1st.  That was in one of the previous laws they passed and I'm not, I cannot remember in which one.  And that, obviously, that deadline was missed when they were unable to agree pretty much in May to an election law.  And  then as the summer wore on it became clear that they may not even be able to have them this year.  But there was a gathering upset, some anger, frustration from political groups that were not represented or are not represented now in the provincial councils and there was a strong feeling that if they wanted to maintain stability they needed to give those people a place at the table -- at least, although perhaps not the size place that they wanted but at least they have to include them in some way.
 
Stephen Farrell: So it's not just a technical question, it actually matters for the future stability of the country is that what you're --
 
Alissa J. Rubin: Yes, it matters a great deal.  And there are two levels on which it matters.  First, it matters because in some areas, notably Anbar Province to some extent and in Salahuddin and in several of the other northen provinces where there are large numbers of Sunnis there is this new movement, the "Awakening" Councils which are more tribal, local people, which are beginning to really represent a lot of the interests of the people living in those areas but the provincial councils which are the centers of power in these largely Sunni provinces are dominated by one political party -- the Iraqi Islamic Party -- and a few other smaller parties but that is the dominant one and  those people don't necessarily represent or don't, in some cases, don't at all represent the people in the region. And so the "Awakeing" Councils and the "Awakening" leaders would like to have a chance to be elected and to weild power there.  So that's very important and if they don't weild power they will -- or if they aren't allowed to weild power, there's a real risk that they will return to violence.  Many of them were insurgents, not all, but certainly some of them. And it would not be a very representative situation. The same to some extent is true in the south as well which is predominately Shia. You have a large numbers of  people loyal to Moqtada al-Sadr, the Shi'ite cleric, and they're very much -- in some provinces they are absolutely the majority and they don't have any place on the provincial councils or they have just one or two seats and the council?  Say thirty, thirty-five members . So they are not able to influence how the council is governed.  So it's important for stability to have those people also have their voices heard and be able to sort of plot the course of events.
 
Stephen Farrell: The provincial election laws sounds incredibly technical but what it seemed to me when I was thinking about it is that we hear all the time out on the street out in the provinces that it's a bit like a game of musical chairs.  That the last time the music stopped four years ago some people weren't sitting on a chair, some people weren't in the room, some people weren't even in the country -- in those blunt terms.  Broadly speaking, is that roughly what we're talking about?  People demanding that the new reality on the ground be recognized.
 
Alissa J. Rubin: Absolutely that's what's happening and it's very important not just for the provincial elections.  But these provincial elections are going to be something of a dress rehearsal for the national elections -- the Parliamentary elections that will be held at the end of 2009.  And so it's quite important that more people be included before those elections are held so that those elections also, or that body, Parliament, begins to represent a bit better the country as a whole.  At the moment, there's still quite a few people left out.  Many of them didn't vote in the last election because they didn't want to vote in the country that they viewed as an occupied nation -- occupied by the Americans.  So they abstained but the result is that they didn't end up with any power and yet they are here and there more and more influential for a variety of reasons depending upon which part of the country you're in.
 
Stephen Farrell: So boiling it down, what we have is that the Sunnis would argue the Kurds are very over represented in areas such as Mosul where the Sunnis did not take part in the last round of elections and I think that certain Sunni parties in Anbar who didn't even exist four years ago would now be saying, "Well we are the Awakening.  We are the ones who brought peace to Anbar.  It's time for the old guard to move aside and for our contribution to the country to be recognized."  I mean, in effect, people crying out for recognition of realities of achievements made over the last four years.
 
Before moving on further with the various factions in Iraq, last Friday's snapshot mentioned an article by Leila Fadel. As noted Saturday, "U.S. strike kills civilians, Iraqis say" was written by Leila Fadel and Laith Hammoudi.  That was my mistake.  My apologies.  This is in the Friday snapshot because Trina and Betty post that one and it saves them having to copy and paste from another snapshot during the week.
 
Back to factions.  Kurdish friend Peter W. Galbraith makes a series of hypothesis in "Is This a 'Victory'?" (New York Review of Books) but what should raise eye brows is a declaration he makes.  (Someone get Tom Hayden a chair.  He'll need to sit down. We'll get to it.)  Galbraith sketches out a scenario where all the factions are in direct competition and opposition.  That's in part to his own desire to represent the desires of the Kurdish region by advocating that Iraq not be a nation but a federation.  Tom-Tom's long had a problem with Senator Joe Biden's support for a fedeartion.  The popular term for that, which Biden rejects, is "partition."  Galbraith has long favored a partition.  This is not the Iraqis making that decision but it being imposed upon them.  (The Kurds have long favored partition.)  Near the end of the article, Galbraith -- an Obama inner-circle accolade of many years -- makse some critiques of Sentator John McCain including: "He has denounced the Obama-Biden plan for a decentralized state but has said nothing about how he would protect Iraq's Kurds, the only committed American allies in the country." 
 
What? 
 
The Obama-Biden plan?  That was once Biden's proposal, long before he was on the Democratic Party's presidential ticket in the v.p. slot.  But Obama supports partitioning Iraq?  Again, Galbraith is part of Barack's inner circle.  It's not fair to call him an "advisor" because he goes so very far back.  (He is the one who, in fact, introduced Barack to  Samantha Power in a kind of War Hawk mixer.  Power, who, for the record, also supports partition.) What was once the Biden plan, Galbraith inadvertantly alerts, is now the Obama-Biden plan. 
 
Tuesday's snapshot noted the Defense Dept press briefing by Lt Gen Lloyd Austin III where he attempted to sell the October 1st 'inclusion' of (some of) the "Awakening" Councils into the central government. NPR's JJ Sutherland attempted to figure out what the 54,000 members being moved over means and what their duties will be in Baghdad since, at present, they run checkpoints.  Repeatedly, Austin demonstrated no awareness of what Sutherland was asking:
 
JJ Sutherland: Sir, I understand that but I'[m saying, "What happens in October?  I understand eventually you want to have them be plumbers or electricians.  But in October, there are a lot of checkpoints that have been manned by the Sons of Iraq.  Are those checkpoints all going to go away?  Are they only going to be staffed by Iraqi police now?  That's my question.  It's not eventually, it's next month.
 
Lt Gen Lloyd Austin: Yeah.  Next month the Iraqi government will begin to work their way through this.  And there's no question that some of them, some of the checkpoints, many of the checkpoints, will be -- will be manned by Iraqi security forces.  In some cases, there may be Sons of Iraq that will be taksed to help with that work.  But in most cases, I think the Iraqi government will be looking to transition people into different types of jobs.
 
Tim Cocks (Reuters) quotes Maj Gen Jeffrey Hammond declaring in Baghdad today, "This cannot be something that's allowed to fail. If the programme were to fail, obviously these guys would be back out on the street, angry, al Qaeda out recruiting them ... We don't need that."   An Iraqi correspondent for McClatchy raises the issue of the checkpoints noting, "The Iraqi people and especially Baghdad is fed up with promises by officials and security commanders of the improving of the security situation. Millions of students in schools and universities started their new studying year this week which will add more traffic in Baghdad and more targets for the car bombs.  If the check points lessen the car bombs, we are happy with them. Instead, we have soldiers and policemen who wave for the cars to move like traffic policemen who are useless."  Meanwhile Sudarsan Raghavan (Washington Post) reports on a new questionnaire being distributed by Iraqi soldiers which asks a home's occupant for the a copy of their house deed, the names of their children and the name of the family's tribe "which identifies his religion and ethnicity.  In Iraq, such a request has often been the first step toward death."
 
 
Back to the topic of elections, Iraqi elections, Alsumaria's "What's after approving Iraq elections law?"  offers an overview of the steps for approval as well as the basics on the legislation: "The law stipulates to use an open list electoral system where voters can choose specific candidates while the old law refers to a closed list system where they could only select political parties.  The new law does not cover the three provinces of Kurdistand.  Polls there will be conducted according to a separate law that the region's parliament needs to write and pass."  Tom A. Peter (Christian Science Monitor) observes that if the provisional elections are scheduled, they "will stir debate over the lack of central services, such as electricity and water.  Many suspect that incumbents will have a hard time getting voter support because of an ongoing lack of basic utilities" and quotes Baghdad Univeristy poli sci professor Abdul Jabbar Ahmad stating, "Democracy does not only mean having an election or passing a law in the legislature. A real government provides services."  And a government that doesn't puts the citizens in jeopardy.  From yesterday's snapshot: "Meanwhile AP reports 327 case -- confirmed cases -- of cholera in Iraq."  Leila Fadel (McClatchy's Baghdad Observer) notes the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction most recent report which found "only 20 percent of families outside of Baghdad province have access to sewage facitlities.  Driving through Iraq's province is all the proof one needs.  In many southern provinces the sewage runs like rivers through the towns while children play nearby and young kids swim through the dirty river water."  Remember what professor Abdul Jabbar Ahmad stated?  "A real government provides services"?  Cholera's outbreak in Iraq is now an annual summer event.  It is completely expected and little is done to prevent it.  The UN's WHO pushes societal obligations off as individual ones as if individuals are the ones at fault for the lack of electricity nad the lack of potatable water?  There has been no improvement in providing potable water, electricity continues to falter in Iraq and purchasing fuel to heat water (and make it safe) is problematic as fuel prices continue to rise. But the 'answer' is to repeat what they repeat every year and pretend that the central government in Iraq is not failing and that Nouri al-Maliki isn't sitting on billions that should have long ago been used for reconstruction. The UN is working on one water project in Iraq.  Jiro Sakaki (The Daily Yomiuri) reports that the UN's Environment Program's International Enivornmental Technology Center is attempting to save the marshlands.
 
In diplomatic news, Xinhua reports today a reception took place in China "to mark the 50th anniversary of the establishment of China-Iraq diplomatic relations."  In other diplomatic news, at the end of this year, the UN mandate that the US has been operating under in Iraq (a mandate put in place after the start of the illegal war) expires December 31st. Puppet of the occupation Nouri al-Maliki has twice extended it (circumventing Parliament). The White House is attempting to push through treaties (and, to circumvent the Senate, is calling them SOFAs). Tina Susman (Los Angeles Times) reports that US Ambassador Ryan Crocker is stating Iran is attempting to prevent the puppet and the White House from reaching an agreement and that "Crocker also speculated that Iran may be tightening its ties to Shiite Muslim militias in Iraq and co-opting them from anti-U.S. cleric Muqtada Sadr, who for the last year has ordered his followers to largely refrain from violence.  He said Iran has a history of using members of political or other opposition groups in other countries to its advantage."   Damien McElroy (Telegraph of London) adds, "Iran has condemned leaked drafts of the bilateral agreement to replace the mandate. Nouri al-Maliki, Iraq's prime minister, replaced professional diplomats on the negotiating team with members of his private office in August, a development that has pro-Iranian politicians at the heart of the negotiations.  Baghdad maintains that US efforts to secure immunity from prosecution in Iraq for troops and contractors is an unacceptible demand. David Satterfield, the top US negotiator, travelled to Baghdad with a counter proposal but Mr Crocker admitted Mr Maliki was unwilling to concede the principle when popular opinion in Iraq was overwhelmingly opposed."  Yesterday Michel Ghandour (Al-Hurra) interviewed US Secretary of State Condi Rice at the Women Leaders Working Group in NYC:
 
Michel Ghandour: Madame Secretary, why do you think there's no agreement yet with the Iraqis regarding the American presence in Iraq, and what role do you think Iran is playing in this regard?
 
Condi Rice: Well, I don't know what role Iran is playing, but it's not for Iran to determine.  It's for the Iraqi Government and the represenatives of the Iraqi people to determine.  And it's a negotiation that's continuing that I think has actually got a good spirit of cooperation.  People do understand that without an agreement -- American forces can only operate on a legal basis, and so we need a legal basis.  But we're working very well with the Iraqis on this.  They're not easy issues, and so it takes time.  But we are working very well and we're working toward agreement.
 
The take-away is a question: If the US Ambassador to Iraq is telling the truth, why didn't Rice also grab the talking point yesterday?  (The question offered it to her.)
 
In a readily established conflict between Iraq and another country, Hurriyet reports that Turkish military planes bombed northern Iraq Thursday night "and hit 16 locations" thought to belong to the PKK.  Al Jazeera states 10 military planes were used in the bombing.  BBC quotes an unnamded PKK spokesperson saying three people were wounded in the bombings.

It's a Friday.  Very little violence gets reported on Fridays.
 
Sahar Issa (McClatchy Newspapers) reports 1 Iraqi soldier shot dead in Anbar Province (four more wounded) and 1 police officer shot dead in Anbar province (one more wounded).  Reuters notes 2 "Awakening" Council members shot dead outside Samarra and 1 person killed in Mosul.
 
 
Today the US military announced: "A Multi-National Division - Center Soldier was killed Sep. 25 when a roadside bomb struck a vehicle that was part of a combat patrol near Iskandariyah. The name of the deceased is being withheld pending notification of next of kin and official release by the Department of Defense. The incident is under investigation." The announcement brings the number of US service members killed in Iraq to 4173 since the start of the illegal war with 22 for the month thus far.
 
Turning to TV, check your local listings.  NOW on PBS explores the bailout and attempts to answer for "Americans: How will this affect me?  This week, NOW on PBS goes inside the round-the-clock efforts in Washington to craft a bailout plan of monumental proportions."  Meanwhile, tonight's debate is on -- for both of the corporatist candidates at any rate.  PBS'  Washington Week is going to do two live broadcasts on Friday.  One before the debate and one after.  Gwen's guests will include Michele Norris (NPR), Michael Duffy (Time), David Wessel (Wall St. Journal) Dan Balz (Washington Post), and a scribe for the New York Times.
 
Four presidential candidates are shut out of tonight's debate.  Two are Bob Barr and Chuck Baldwin.  The other two?   Cynthia McKinney is the Green presidential candidate and she notes on the economic meltdown:
 
Last week, I posted ten points (that were by no means exhaustive) for Congressional action immediately in the wake of the financial crisis now gripping our country. At that time, the Democratic leadership of Congress was prepared to adjourn the current legislative Session to campaign, without taking any action at all to put policies in place that protect U.S. taxpayers and the global community that has accepted U.S. financial leadership. Those ten points, to be taken in conjunction with the Power to the People Committee's platform available on the campaign website at (http://votetruth08.com/index.php/resources/campaignplatform), are as follows:

1. Enactment of a foreclosure moratorium now before the next phase of ARM interest rate increases take effect;
2. elimination of all ARM mortgages and their renegotiation into 30- or 40-year loans;
3. establishment of new mortgage lending practices to end predatory and discriminatory practices;
4. establishment of criteria and construction goals for affordable housing;
5. redefinition of credit and regulation of the credit industry so that discriminatory practices are completely eliminated;
6. full funding for initiatives that eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in home ownership;
7. recognition of shelter as a right according to the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights to which the U.S. is a signatory so that no one sleeps on U.S. streets;
8. full funding of a fund designed to cushion the job loss and provide for retraining of those at the bottom of the income scale as the economy transitions;
9. close all tax loopholes and repeal of the Bush tax cuts for the top 1% of income earners; and
10. fairly tax corporations, denying federal subsidies to those who relocate jobs overseas repeal NAFTA.

In addition to these ten points, I now add four more:

11. Appointment of former Comptroller General David Walker to fully audit all recipients of taxpayer cash infusions, including JP Morgan, Bear Stearns, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and AIG, and to monitor their trading activities into the future;
12. elimination of all derivatives trading;
13. nationalization of the Federal Reserve and the establishment of a federally-owned, public banking system that makes credit available for small businesses, homeowners, manufacturing operations, renewable energy and infrastructure investments; and
14. criminal prosecution of any activities that violated the law, including conflicts of interest that led to the current crisis.

Ellen Brown, author of "The Web of Debt" writes at http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/, "Such a public bank today could solve not only the housing crisis but a number of other pressing problems, including the infrastructure crisis and the energy crisis. Once bankrupt businesses have been restored to solvency, the usual practice is to return them to private hands; but a better plan for Fannie and Freddie might be to simply keep them as public institutions."

Too many times politicians have told us to support the "free market." The unfolding news informs us in a most costly manner that free markets don't work. This is a financial system of their making. It's now past time for the people to have an economic system of their own. A reading of the full text on the Congressional "Agreement on Principles" for the proposed $700 billion bailout reveals the sham that this so-called agreement truly is. Today our country faces an economic 9/11. The problem that is unfolding is truly systemic and no stop-gap measures that maintain the current bankrupt structure will be sufficient to resolve this crisis of the U.S. economic engine.

Today is my son's birthday. What a gift to the young people of this country if we were to present to them a clean break from the policies that produced this economic disaster, the "financial tsunami" that former Comptroller General David Walker warned us of so many months ago and instead offered them a U.S. economic superstructure that truly was their own.

Power to the People!

McKinney's running mate Rosa Clemente will be speaking at the International People's Democratic Uhuru Movement (InPDUM) Saturday, September 27th. Ralph Nader is the independent presidential candidate and he is also shut out of tonight's debate.  Nader notes that, more than any cash infusion, the country needs leadership with spine:
 
 
Congress needs to show some backbone before the federal government pours more money on the financial bonfire started by the arsonists on Wall Street.
1.Congress should hold a series of hearings and invite broad public comment on any proposed bailout. Congress is supposed to be a co-equal branch of our federal government. It needs to stop the stampede to give Bush a $700 billion check. Public hearings should be held to determine what alternatives might exist to the four-page proposal advanced by Treasury Secretary Henry M. Paulson.
2.Whatever is ultimately done, the bailout plan should not be insulated from judicial review. Remember there is a third co-equal branch of government: the judiciary. The judiciary does not need to review each buy-and-sell decision by the Treasury Department, but there should be some boundaries established to the Treasury Department's discretion.  Judicial review is needed to ensure that unbridled discretion is not abused.
3.Sunlight is a good disinfectant. The bailout that is ultimately approved must provide for full and timely disclosure of all bailout details. This will discourage conflicts of interest and limit the potential of sweetheart deals.
4.Firms that accept government bailout monies must agree to disclose their transactions and be more honest in their accounting. They should agree to end off-the-books accounting maneuvers, for example.
5.Taxpayers must be protected by having a stake in any recovery. The bailout plan should provide opportunities for taxpayers to recoup funds that are made available to problem financial institutions, or to benefit from the financial institutions' rising stock price and increased profitability after being bailed out.
6.The current so-called "regulators" cannot be trusted. The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), "the investigative arm of Congress" and "the congressional watchdog," must regularly review the bailout. We cannot trust the financial "regulators," who allowed the slide into financial disaster, to manage the bailout without outside monitoring.
7.It is time to put the federal cop back on the financial services beat. Strong financial regulations and independent regulators are necessary to rebuild trust in our financial institutions and to prevent further squandering of our tax dollars. The Justice Department and the SEC also need to scrutinize the expanding mess with an eye to uncovering corporate crime and misdeeds. Major news outlets are reporting that the FBI is investigating American International Group, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Lehman Brothers.
8.Cap executive compensation and stop giving the Wall Street gamblers golden parachutes. The CEOs who have created the financial disaster should not be allowed to leave with millions in hand when so many pensioners and small shareholders are seeing their investments evaporate. The taxpayers are bailing out Wall Street so that the financial system continues to function, not to further enrich the CEOs and executives who created this mess.
9.Congress should pass the Financial Consumers' Information and Representation Act, to permit citizens to form a federally-chartered nonprofit membership organization to strengthen consumer representation in government proceedings that concern the financial services industry. As the savings and loan disasters of the 1980s and the Wall Street debacles of the last few years have demonstrated, there is an overriding need for consumers and taxpayers to have the organized means to enhance their influence on financial issues.
10.The repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, separating traditional banks from investment banks, helped pave the way for the current disaster. It is time to re-regulate the financial sector. The current crisis is also leading to even further conglomeration and concentration in the financial sector. We must revive and apply antitrust principles, so that banking consumers can benefit from competition and taxpayers are less vulnerable to too-big-to-fail institutions, which merge with each other to further concentration.
11.Congress should impose a securities and derivatives speculation tax. A tax on financial trading would slow down the churning of stocks and financial instruments, and could raise substantial monies to pay for the bailout.
12.Regulators should impose greater margin requirements, making speculators use more of their own money and diminishing reckless casino capitalism.
Ask your representative a few questions: "What should be done to limit banking institutions from investing in high-risk activities?" "What should be done to ensure banks are meeting proper capital standards given the financial quicksand that has spread as a result of the former Senator Phil Gramm's deregulation efforts?" And, "What is being done to protect small investors?" 
P.S. Shareholders also have some work to do. They should have listened when Warren Buffett called securities derivatives a "time bomb" and "financial weapons of mass destruction." The Wall Street crooks and unscrupulous speculators use and draining of "other people's money" out of pension funds and mutual funds should motivate painfully passive shareholders to organize to gain greater authority to control the companies they own. Where is the shareholder uprising?
 
We've highlighted some of Jo Freeman's outstanding reporting on the 1976 political conventions recently.  Freeman also covered this year's Democratic and Republican convention for Senior Women Web and you can find her articles here.   We'll note this from her "Sarah Palin: A Risky Move and A Gift to the Women's Movement" (Senior Women Web):
 
 Like Hillary's 2008 run for President, Ferraro's 1984 run for the second spot brought all sorts of sexism out of the closet.  It was an eye-opener for everyone. In the end, this bold, risky choice didn't seem to affect the outcome.  The exit polls showed that having a woman on the ticket was a prime concern for only a few. These voters about equally divided between those who told pollsters that they voted for a woman and those who said they voted against one.
 
Ferraro's candidacy had a bigger effect on those who answered the annual polling question (in a different poll):  Would you vote for "a well-qualified woman of your own party for President"? After Ferraro a party gap appeared. Republicans were 50 percent more likely than Democrats to answer "No."   Republicans have continued to say they would not vote for a well-qualified (but unnamed) woman for President at a much higher rate than Democrats.
 
Wonder what they will tell the pollsters this year?
 
Governor Sarah Palin is the v.p. nominee on the Republican ticket.  Yesterday The CBS Evening News with Katie Couric aired the second part of Couric's interview with Palin.  Excerpt:
 
Katie Couric: As we stand before this august building and institution, what do you see as the role of the United States in the world?

Sarah Palin: I see the United States as being a force for good in the world. And as Ronald Reagan used to talk about, America being the beacon of light and hope for those who are seeking democratic values and tolerance and freedom. I see our country being able to represent those things that can be looked to … as that leadership, that light needed across the world.

Couric: In preparing for this conversation, a lot of our viewers … and Internet users wanted to know why you did not get a passport until last year. And they wondered if that indicated a lack of interest and curiosity in the world.

Palin: I'm not one of those who maybe came from a background of, you know, kids who perhaps graduate college and their parents give them a passport and give them a backpack and say go off and travel the world.  No, I've worked all my life. In fact, I usually had two jobs all my life until I had kids. I was not a part of, I guess, that culture. The way that I have understood the world is through education, through books, through mediums that have provided me a lot of perspective on the world.
 
Part one aired Wednesday evening and both links have text and video.  As Jo Freeman noted, Palin is following in Ferraro's footsteps (Palin has publicly acknowledged that and that she follows in Hillary Clinton's footsteps as well).  Genevieve Roth (Glamour) spoke with Ferraro to get her tips for Palin and Ferraro offers many worthwhile reflections and suggestions but probably sums it up the best with this: "The bottom line is, Sarah Palin doesn't need advice from me or anyone. She wouldn't be in the position she's in if she wasn't able to deal with the campaign."
 
 


Posted at 04:14 pm by thecommonills
 

The US military announces another death

The US military announces another death

Today the US military announced: "A Multi-National Division - Center Soldier was killed Sep. 25 when a roadside bomb struck a vehicle that was part of a combat patrol near Iskandariyah. The name of the deceased is being withheld pending notification of next of kin and official release by the Department of Defense. The incident is under investigation." The announcement brings the number of US service members killed in Iraq to 4173 since the start of the illegal war with 22 for the month thus far.

Meanwhile Derek Kravitz offered "Army Probes Possible Toxic Exposure in Iraq" (Washington Post) Wednesday afternoon:

Senior Army officials are investigating claims that National Guardsmen were exposed to a toxin in 2003 while protecting a water pumping plant in Iraq.
Two employees with the firm Kellogg, Brown and Root told Senate Democrats in June that members of the 1st Battalion, 152nd Infantry division of the Indiana National Guard were exposed to sodium dichromate, despite promises from company officials that the Qarmat Ali facility in Basra, Iraq, was safe.
One employee reported seeing the plant covered in a "layer of bright orange dust" that was carried by the wind, Gannett News Service reports.

Staying with safety issues, alarms are being raised re: the security of Baghdad. An Iraqi correspondent for McClatchy contributes "Traffic Jam Again" (Inside Iraq):

People keep asking of the real benefits of having so many check points all over Baghdad with the violence starts again to show up these days after a period of freezing which didn't last long. Is this a kind of pressure message to the government? Or is something bigger than that? Is it related to the military operations in Diyala and Mosul?
The Iraqi people and especially Baghdad is fed up with promises by officials and security commanders of the improving of the security situation. Millions of students in schools and universities started their new studying year this week which will add more traffic in Baghdad and more targets for the car bombs.
If the check points lessen the car bombs, we are happy with them. Instead, we have soldiers and policemen who wave for the cars to move like traffic policemen who are useless.


The concern has been expressed directly to the US military. We'll drop back to Tuesday's snapshot to note a Monday press briefing:

Staying with the Defense Dept, Lt Gen Lloyd Austin III briefed reporters yesterday from Iraq and used "positive" and "progress" repeatedly. For what doesn't matter, check out the write up by Adam Levine (CNN). The press briefing was so much more interesting. Austin did a hard sell on the "Awakening" Council members declaring, "One of our primary focus areas as we move foward is transitioning the Sons of Iraq program to the Iraqi government. The volunteer movement that started in Anbar and spread across the rest of the country significantly contributed to the security successes that we are now taking advantage of. The Sons of Iraq have paid a heavy price fight al Qaeda and other insurgent groups, and it's important that the government of Iraq responsibly transition them into meaningful employment. Prime Minister Maliki has assured me that the government will help those who help the people of Iraq. And so next week in Baghdad the government will accept responsibility for approximately 54,000 Sons of Iraq, and we will be there to assist in the transfer. We spent the last few weeks working hand in hand with our Iraqi partners on this transition, and I'm confident that this will go well. And you should know that we will not abandon the Sons of Iraq." In response to a question from Bill McMichael of Military Times, Austin stated that there were 99,000 "Awakening" Council members and 54,000 are in Baghdad "so we will start with the Baghdad province next month and transition that element first, and then we will begin to move to other parts of the country and transition those elements." The most interesting exchange took place when JJ Sutherland (NPR) attempted to pin down Austin on what happens when the 54,000 transfer over in terms of what they do now and what they will do? Sutherland had to repeatedly bring up the issue of "Awakening" Council members currently staffing checkpoints in Baghdad and ask what happens to those checkpoints? Austin's repeated replies indicated he hadn't understood the question because no one in the US military had thought about that. Best exchange.

JJ Sutherland: Sir, I understand that but I'[m saying, "What happens in October? I understand eventually you want to have them be plumbers or electricians. But in October, there are a lot of checkpoints that have been manned by the Sons of Iraq. Are those checkpoints all going to go away? Are they only going to be staffed by Iraqi police now? That's my question. It's not eventually, it's next month.

Lt Gen Lloyd Austin: Yeah. Next month the Iraqi government will begin to work their way through this. And there's no question that some of them, some of the checkpoints, many of the checkpoints, will be -- will be manned by Iraqi security forces. In some cases, there may be Sons of Iraq that will be taksed to help with that work. But in most cases, I think the Iraqi government will be looking to transition people into different types of jobs.

At which point the Pentagon's spokesperson (DOD press office director) Gary Keck jumped in with the cry of one more question.

While the military ignores what the shift re: checkpoints in Baghdad might mean for the capitol, tensions continue on Iraq's border with Turkey. Hurriyet offers "Turkish warplanes hit 16 PKK positions in northern Iraq, army says" which explains Turkish military planes bombed northern Iraq Thursday night "and hit 16 locations" thought to belong to the PKK:

The military has not revealed any casualty figures. It said all warplanes returned safely to bases in Turkey.
Previous media reports suggest Thursday's air strikes began after 1900 GMT in two separate regions in northern Iraq. "Last night two separate regions were bombed where the PKK was believed to be taking shelter," a high-ranking Turkish security official told Reuters.
The mayor of the town of Jarawa in Iraq, Azad Wassu, said there were Turkish air strikes on the Qandil Mountains from 10 p.m. on Thursday until 12:30 a.m. The PKK confirmed the attack and said one of its members was wounded, Reuters added.

TV notes, PBS and check local listings. In many markets, the programs begin airing tonight. NOW on PBS explores the bailout:

The government's historic proposal to bail out the U.S. banking system is raising as many questions as it is offering solutions. Some in Congress are warning against reacting too quickly; others want conditions that protect homeowners, increase oversight, and limit the compensation of corporate executives.
But the number one question on the minds of Americans: How will this affect me? This week, NOW on PBS goes inside the round-the-clock efforts in Washington to craft a bailout plan of monumental proportions.
NOW's cameras follow Damon Silvers, an associate general counsel at the AFL-CIO, the nation's largest federation of labor unions, as he works to get help for working Americans in addition to bailing out financial firms in distress. Silvers, an architect of the major provisions Congressional Democrats are pushing for in the bill, provides key insight on the stake ordinary working Americans have in the fate of this proposal, and on what comes next.

Washington Week plans for . . . anything because tonight's scheduled debate remains iffy:

The nation’s financial crisis ramped up partisan and presidential politics this week putting both a rescue plan for Wall Street and the first presidential debate up in the air.
Late today [Thursday], Barack Obama and John McCain met with President Bush and Congressional Leaders at the White House to discuss the nation’s economic crisis and possible solutions but reports are that the meeting went very badly. At this hour, it’s still unclear how this will play out and whether or not there will be a presidential debate on Friday.
WASHINGTON WEEK is tracking developments and is planning two LIVE broadcasts Friday night. Gwen Ifill and our panel will have the most up-to-date details on the economic bailout plan as well as a preview of the presidential debate LIVE on WASHINGTON WEEK at 8pm (ET) on most PBS stations in the Eastern and Central time zones.
WASHINGTON WEEK is tracking developments and is planning two LIVE broadcasts Friday night -- one before and the other after PBS coverage of the debate moderated by Jim Lehrer of the NewsHour. Gwen Ifill and our panel will have the most up-to-date details on the economic bailout plan as well as a preview of the presidential debate LIVE on WASHINGTON WEEK at 8pm (ET) on most PBS stations in the Eastern and Central time zones.

Joining Gwen around the WASHINGTON WEEK table:

Michele Norris of NPR
Michael Duffy of TIME Magazine
David Wessel of The Wall Street Journal
Dan Balz of The Washington Post
John Harwood of CNBC and The New York Times

You won’t want to miss a minute of WASHINGTON WEEK on this historic week of news.

NOW on PBS will have video streaming of the latest program beginning Saturday. Washington Week will offer video and audio streaming (with a transcript to follow on Monday).

On the meltdown, Micah notes this from Team Nader:

Nader Responds to McCain/Obama/Bush White House Meeting

Thursday, September 25, 2008 at 12:00:00 AM

ShareThisShareThis

Press Release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: Toby Heaps, 202-441-6795

Nader Statement on Bailout, Mcain/Obama Meeting With Bush

Bailout is Big Mistake. Crackdown on Corporate Crime. Protect Homeowners.

Ralph Nader and Matt Gonzalez vigorously oppose Bush's $700 billion taxpayer bailout of Wall Street.

"This is not just a bailout of Wall Street" says Nader, "It's a bailing out of the bankrupt Republican and Democratic policies that have led us to where we are today with Senators John "Deregulation" McCain and Joe "MBNA" Biden leading the way.

Full Statement from Ralph Nader:

Today at 4 p.m., Senators John McCain and Barack Obama will meet with other Congressional leaders and President Bush to join the stampede to bail out Wall Street with Main Street and Elm Street's money.

Unfortunately, their rhetorical flourishes to crackdown on Wall Street and protect Main Street will not be met with substance.

The bailout ignores the needs of millions of swindled families facing foreclosure, and it squanders an opportunity to bring about real regulatory change, shareholder power and taxpayer equity that would prevent economic crises like this from happening again. Wall Street's wildly overpaid bosses are addicted to speculative gambling with other people's money. When a drug addict is facing overdose, you don't give them more needles.

We need to protect homeowners and our neighborhoods first. That's why Nader/Gonzalez support introducing a law with a 5-year sunset clause that would provide homeowners facing foreclosure the right to rent to own their homes at fair market value.

Wall Street is out of control. We need to bring some sense of accountability, transparency, and law and order back to Wall Street's crooks and speculators, or they will desperately seek socialism to bail out their criminal corporate capitalism, going to the taxpayer trough in Washington DC each time. That's why Nader/Gonzalez support a Wall Street speculation tax, starting on derivatives, which would make Wall Street less like Las Vegas, and generate enough funds to eliminate the tax burden on the first $50,000 of income for every working American.

-End-

ShareThisShareThis



Meanwhile, Amy Goodman continues her long history of lying today which is only a surprise if you haven't been paying attention. Today she cozies up to homophobia (yet again -- see Marcia's "Amy Goodman and other homophobes" from last night). Goody cozies up to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iranian president, and refuses to challenge him. Now Bill Clinton (her most famous interview) in 2000, she can challenge. But the Red Diaper Baby is happy to let Ahmadinejad not only LIE but to smear the dead? Of course, because Goodman is a homophobe. For the reality Goody won't pursue, you can read Robert Verkaik's "A life or death decision" (Independent of London, March 6, 2008):

A gay teenager who sought sanctuary in Britain when his boyfriend was executed by the Iranian authorities now faces the same fate after losing his legal battle for asylum.
Mehdi Kazemi, 19, came to London to study English in 2004 but later discovered that his boyfriend had been arrested by the Iranian police, charged with sodomy and hanged.
In a telephone conversation with his father in Tehran, Mr Kazemi was told that before the execution in April 2006, his boyfriend had been questioned about sexual relations he had with other men and under interrogation had named Mr Kazemi as his partner.
Fearing for his own life if he returned to Iran, Mr Kazemi claimed asylum in Britain. But late in 2007 his case was refused. Terror-stricken at the prospect of deportation the young Iranian made a desperate attempt to evade deportation and fled Britain for Holland where he is now being detained amid a growing outcry from campaigners.

Back to the US presidential race, Cynthia McKinney is the Green presidential candidate:

A Gift for a Generation: A U.S. Financial System of Our Own
Thursday, 25 September 2008 20:20
A Gift for a Generation: A U.S. Financial System of Our Own

by Cynthia McKinney
September 25, 2008

Last week, I posted ten points (that were by no means exhaustive) for Congressional action immediately in the wake of the financial crisis now gripping our country. At that time, the Democratic leadership of Congress was prepared to adjourn the current legislative Session to campaign, without taking any action at all to put policies in place that protect U.S. taxpayers and the global community that has accepted U.S. financial leadership. Those ten points, to be taken in conjunction with the Power to the People Committee's platform available on the campaign website at (http://votetruth08.com/index.php/resources/campaignplatform), are as follows:

1. Enactment of a foreclosure moratorium now before the next phase of ARM interest rate increases take effect;
2. elimination of all ARM mortgages and their renegotiation into 30- or 40-year loans;
3. establishment of new mortgage lending practices to end predatory and discriminatory practices;
4. establishment of criteria and construction goals for affordable housing;
5. redefinition of credit and regulation of the credit industry so that discriminatory practices are completely eliminated;
6. full funding for initiatives that eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in home ownership;
7. recognition of shelter as a right according to the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights to which the U.S. is a signatory so that no one sleeps on U.S. streets;
8. full funding of a fund designed to cushion the job loss and provide for retraining of those at the bottom of the income scale as the economy transitions;
9. close all tax loopholes and repeal of the Bush tax cuts for the top 1% of income earners; and
10. fairly tax corporations, denying federal subsidies to those who relocate jobs overseas repeal NAFTA.

In addition to these ten points, I now add four more:

11. Appointment of former Comptroller General David Walker to fully audit all recipients of taxpayer cash infusions, including JP Morgan, Bear Stearns, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and AIG, and to monitor their trading activities into the future;
12. elimination of all derivatives trading;
13. nationalization of the Federal Reserve and the establishment of a federally-owned, public banking system that makes credit available for small businesses, homeowners, manufacturing operations, renewable energy and infrastructure investments; and
14. criminal prosecution of any activities that violated the law, including conflicts of interest that led to the current crisis.

Ellen Brown, author of "The Web of Debt" writes at http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/, "Such a public bank today could solve not only the housing crisis but a number of other pressing problems, including the infrastructure crisis and the energy crisis. Once bankrupt businesses have been restored to solvency, the usual practice is to return them to private hands; but a better plan for Fannie and Freddie might be to simply keep them as public institutions."

Too many times politicians have told us to support the "free market." The unfolding news informs us in a most costly manner that free markets don't work. This is a financial system of their making. It's now past time for the people to have an economic system of their own. A reading of the full text on the Congressional "Agreement on Principles" for the proposed $700 billion bailout reveals the sham that this so-called agreement truly is. Today our country faces an economic 9/11. The problem that is unfolding is truly systemic and no stop-gap measures that maintain the current bankrupt structure will be sufficient to resolve this crisis of the U.S. economic engine.

Today is my son's birthday. What a gift to the young people of this country if we were to present to them a clean break from the policies that produced this economic disaster, the "financial tsunami" that former Comptroller General David Walker warned us of so many months ago and instead offered them a U.S. economic superstructure that truly was their own.

Power to the People!


Click here to read Cynthia's previous column (link goes to Black Agenda Report). McKinney's running mate Rosa Clemente will be speaking at the International People's Democratic Uhuru Movement (InPDUM) Saturday, September 27th. Ralph Nader is the independent presidential candidate and Tori notes this from Team Nader:


Nader Demands to be Included in Debates

Thursday, September 25, 2008 at 12:00:00 AM

ShareThisShareThis

Press Release
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Contact: (Washington) Toby Heaps, 202-471-5833, toby@votenader.org

NADER TO OBAMA/MCCAIN: LET ME IN!

For the economy's sake, there is no choice but to end war and make peace.

On the eve of the first Presidential debate on foreign policy and in the midst of the biggest economic meltdown since 1929, Ralph Nader presents a simple solution for fixing the biggest hole in the taxpayer's pocket and challenges McCain/Obama to debate him on it.

"My campaign is on the ballot in 45 states and is polling at around 5 percent nationally, higher in several key swing states. I have earned a podium in the debates, and, unlike McCain and Obama, my foreign policy brings our soldiers back from Iraq and Afghanistan. This will save us a few hundred billion dollars in direct and deferred costs each year."

Mr. Nader elaborated: "The fact that a candidate can call for changing the date of the debate only two days before it is scheduled indicates how easy it would be for the candidates to also call for the inclusion of the leading third party and independent candidates, which would bring fresh ideas to the table on how our country can most effectively tackle this heavy economic challenge, starting with curbing our imperialist foreign policy."

Please see Ralph Nader's case to open up the debates in today's edition of USA Today



Nader and Obama Girl join forces to open up debates
(check Youtube for this video after 2pm)

See blog in favor of giving voice to the third of voters not with two parties


-END-

ShareThisShareThis

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.












Posted at 04:13 pm by thecommonills
 


Next Page




<< September 2008 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02 03 04 05 06
07 08 09 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30


If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:




rss feed