 |

Monday, September 29, 2008
Monday,
September 29, 2008. Chaos and violence continue, the US military
announces another death, the US Secretary of Defense declares no
withdrawal happening if Obama or McCain become president, Friday's
non-debate and more. Today Basil Adas (Gulf News) covers
the continued efforts to of the White House and the puppet government
in Baghdad to push through a treaty (circumventing the US Senate and
the US Consitution, though the Iraqi Parliament will supposedly be able
to give a thumbs up or thumbs down)masquerading as a SOFA. Adas reports
that the issue of the immunity of US troops is something the US now
signals they're willing to discuss according to the Kurdistan
Alliance's Feriad Rawanduz who is hopeful that a treaty can be pushed
through before the end of the year. Abdul Aziz al Hakim tells Adas that
possibly their could be a judicial body comprised of both Iraqis and
Americans who would rule on the actions of individual US service
members. Ryan Crocker, US Ambassador to Iraq, is optimistic and claims
the 'movement' is some sort of rebuke to Iran (from Iraq). Adas says
the path after a treaty is drawn up is the Executive Board, then the
National Security Council and the Iraqi Parliament. Finally, Adas
notes: "Meanwhile, Defence Minister Abdul Qader Jasem Mohammad
confirmed yesterday that Washington had offered a number of Beechcraft
spy planes to bolster the Iraqi security forces." Iran's Press TV reports
that rumors state the White House and the puppet have "settled their
main differences over a controversial security agreement." Nothing was
said about the treaty in Robert Wood's press briefing at the US State
Dept today nor did Tony Fratto mention it in his White House press
briefing today. US Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker has repeatedly
blamed the Iranian government for the US failure to control the puppet
and did so again in an interview with AP's John Daniszewski where he stated,
"The evidence is pretty clear. It is the stream of public statements
coming out of Tehran, political and clerical figures, all criticizing
the agreement. So they are being very open about their interference." From
the treaty to provincial elections. Last week a bill passed the
Parliament that is now awaits a thumbs up or down from the presidency
council. On Sunday, Iraqi Christians took to the streets to protest
the bill. AP noted
that "hundreds of Christians staged protests" today in Iraq and those
protests were probably most effective on the world stage. al-Maliki's
shown no concern for the rights of any of the religious minorities in
Iraq; however, the puppet knows that persecution of Christians won't
play well with the Americans still supporting the Iraq War so he moved
quickly to insist that he supports seats in Parliament being reserved
for religious minorities. Sadly, some will play that development out as
if it matters. It doesn't matter at all. Parliament voted on the bill,
it is sent to the presidency council who will either sign off on it
(making it law) or reject it. al-Maliki's way too late to impact
anything unless the bill is rejected and the Parliament takes another
shot at it. Reuters notes
that al-Maliki's claiming Parliament can add things to the bill. Well
that would actually make it a new bill and not what the full Parliament
voted on. Reuters quotes
Iraq's Chaladean Catholic leader, Cardinal Emmanuel III Delly, stating,
"I call on the presidency council not to approve the cancellation of
article 50 of the provincial law which is an oppression against our
presence and representation in Iraqi society." Shamiram Daniali (Assyria Times) declares,
"Just when we thought things cannot possibly go any worse for the most
persecuted population of Iraq, its indigenous people who are Assyrian
Christians, we witnessed the biggest injustice yet by the Iraqi
Parliament." Staying with the weekend, Saturday AFP reported
a Jalawla raid by the Iraqi police on the Kuridsh pesh merga and,
citing Salah Koikha ("spokesman for the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan"),
1 pesh merga member was killed during the raid. Reuters adds
that 1 Iraqi police office officer died. The raid took place in Diyala
Province where the pesh merga has prevented Iraqi forces from enterting
certain areas such as Khanaquin (see last Monday's snapshot). India's Economic Times observes,
"In a mirror image of Kirkuk, the Kurdish town of Khanaqin near the
border with Iran that holds sizeable oil reserves is being exposed to
ethnic tensions and rival territorial claims. The local Kurdish
political leadership warns that the area could see an ethnic explosion,
as they call for Khanaqin to join the adjoining autonomous Kurdistan
Regional Government (KRG) of northern Iraq." This morning Basil Adas (Gulf News) reported,
"Meanwhile, Defence Minister Abdul Qader Jasem Mohammad confirmed
yesterday that Washington had offered a number of Beechcraft spy planes
to bolster the Iraqi security forces." Vanessa Gera (AP) reports
that it was 12 planes and that Mohammed al-Askari, Defense Minister,
has confirmed that "six King Air planes had been delivered and the
other six were expected soon." In a possible related item, Aseel Kami (Reuters) reports Iraqi doctors can now pack heat thanks to a new decree from al-Maliki's cabinet. Violence continued over the weekend and Sundays bombings gathered attention. Reporting on that (and the Iraqi Christians), Tina Susman (Los Angeles Times) observed,
"The violence and the protests showed the tensions that still exist in
Iraq despite progress on security and political reconciliation. The
blasts were particularly jarring because they came around sunset, when
the markets are filled with people buying food for the evening meal
that breaks their daylong fast during the holy month of Ramadan."
Susman quoted bombing victim Hidar Abdulhussein stating, "We are
innocent and peaceful people. Why are they targeting markets and
shoppers? How were they able to get in? There are so many army and
police checkpoints." Sam Dagher and Muhammed al-Obaidi (New York Times) cite
Mizher Abed Hanoush who "echoed concerns voiced by many Iraqis in
recent weeks about the fragility of the security situation in Baghdad.
'The situation is turning to the worse again, I do not know why,' he
said." AP notes that the death toll from yesterday's bombings have climbed to at least 35. Turning to some of today's violence . . . Bombings? Hussein Kadhim (McClatchy Newspapers) reports a
Baghdad mortar attack which wounded five people, another which wounded
three people and a third which wounded one person while a Mosul car
bombing left nine people wounded "including 5 Peshmerga members of the
PDK." Reuters notes
1 "Sunni Arab tribal leader died on Monday of wounds inflicted by a
bomb attached to his car that exploded on Sunday in Mosul," an
Iskandariya roadside bombing that claimed 1 life (three people wounded)
and a Samarra roadside bombing that left Samarra Mayor Mahmoud Khalif
(and four of his guards) wounded. Shootings? Corpses? Reuters notes, "A U.S. soldier was killed by small arms fire when his patrol was attacked in eastern Baghdad, the U.S. military said." Meanwhile,
speaking in DC at the National Defense University today, US Secretary
Robert Gates joked about the run away defense budget, "Resources
are scarce -- and yes, it is a sign I've already been at the Pentagon
for too long to say that with a straight face when talking about a half
trillion dollar base budget. Nonetheless, we still must set priorities
and consider inescapable tradeoffs and opportunity costs." He further made clear that McCain or Obama, there's no withdrawal from Iraq happening: "In
Iraq, the number of U.S. combat units in country will decline over
time. About the only argument you hear now is about the pacing of the
drawdown. Still, no matter who is elected president in November, there
will continue to be some kind of American advisory and
counter-terrorism effort in Iraq for years to come." Moving into the US presidential race. Lynette Long is supporting the McCain - Palin ticket and Long is a feminist. Bill Clinton cited her last week on ABC's The View and yesterday on NBC's Meet The Press. At her site, Long compiles a list of reasons
as to why Governor Palin is "Good For Women" which includes "keeping
the issue of sexism in the United States of America front and center"
and expanding "the definition of feminism." She also writes that following speaking at a McCain - Palin rally,
"An executive member of the National Organization for Women contacted
me the very next day. It was a friendly conversation tinted with
sarcasm. 'How do you feel about your speech?' she asked me. 'Great.'
I responded. 'Why shouldn't I feel great. I gave a speech about
women's rights in front of a large audience. I highlighted the
under-representation of women in every branch of government, the sexism
in the media, and the unfair treatment of Hillary Clinton by the
Democratic Party.' 'Where did you give your speech?' A rhetorical
question deserved a quip answer, 'Before thirty-thousand Americans.'
Republicans are Americans, aren't they. 'By speaking at a McCain-Palin
event people will think you are endorsing McCain.' That's the point, I
am endorsing McCain-Palin." We're starting with this because a number
of members of the Cult of Obama are repeating the lie that many
'feminists' have. (And it will be 'feminists' until they correct that
and other lies they've spread.) 'Sarah Palin wants rape victims to pay
for their own rape kits!' Prove it. September 24th, FactCheck.org published their item on it and they found nothing to prove that rumor.
No proof. That's how the Cult took down Hillary, they repeated lies
and piled on more lies. Usually, the most effective lie was the one
that turned a Hillary strength into a liability -- a strength Barack
didn't posses. So when 'feminists' rush to tell you Sarah Palin hunted
wolves from a helicopter, the appropriate response is, "You, ma'am, are
a damn liar." And when they insist that Palin forced rape victims to
pay for rape kits, the same reply should be followed by pointing to Barack's
"Faith, Family, Values Tour" with headliner Doug Kmiec who is both a
homophobe (and actively fighting to overturn marriage equality in
California) and an anti-choice advocate who admitted to the New York Times last month that he wanted Roe v. Wade overturned. If 'feminists' think that's feminism, they have more problems than lying. As
the press continues digging around Palin's past can someone help me out
here? I thought during the Democratic Party primaries, when Barack
kept suggesting that there was something evil in Hillary and Bill
Clinton's tax returns, that Barack himself made a promise. There was
nothing evil in their tax returns as was demonstrated when the Clintons
released them. But didn't Barack promise to release his papers from
when he was in the Illinois legislature. It was hard, he whined,
because he didn't have that much money. Well he's sitting on a large
wad of Wall St. money and surely, all these months later, the papers
must have been compiled. Exactly when will he be making them public? Violet Socks (Reclusive Leftist) explains,
"Whenever women in a patriarchal society buck male opinion, there's
hell to pay and they know it. Women in America really went out on a
limb this year by backing Hillary in the face of withering derision
from men (and from young women attempting to curry favor with men,
consciously or not). Now they're making amends by piling on Palin.
Ridiculing Sarah Palin as a moron -- which she clearly is not -- is de
rigueur for everybody now in the Obama camp. It's their preferred
sport. It's true that Palin is verbally awkward in interviews, but
then, Obama himself is a man whose unscripted remarks are so ignorant
and confused they defy belief. A teleprompter-deprived Obama thinks
there are 57 states in the Union, believes Oregon is in the Great Lakes
region, doesn't know which states border his own state of Illinois, and
has no idea which Senate committees he's on." And, yes, in response to
some e-mails today, the ridicule Palin faces is sexism and just because
some self-proclaimed 'feminist' online wants to pretend Tina Fey's sexist (and, yes, bitchy) portrayal of Palin
is nothing to fret over doesn't make it so. Staying with
stupidity, the I-stalk-my-ex-and-trash-his-younger (and
prettier)-new-partner 'feminist' Katha Pollitt who offered up that
Palin was an "affirmative action babe." First, there's nothing wrong
with affirmative action when someone is qualified. Second, when
Katha's sold out feminism (as she freely admitted doing in April) for
her hero Barack, maybe calling a candidate an "affirmative action" hire
isn't the way to go because Barack's qualifications are non-existant.
Katha wipes the sweat from underneath her many chins, hunkers down at
the keyboard and comes up with one falsehood after another. At one
point, she has to drag Carly Fiorina into it because Katha longs for a
girlfight (longs for anything that will get her fat ass some attention
but it's not 1996 and most stopped reading Katha long ago) so she
rushes to type that Carly Fiornia was "ushered off the stage after she
pointed out that Sarah Plin couldn't run a major corporation". Just as
Katha has to insist that she was dumped by the one who got away because
of his own problems (not the story everyone else heard), Katha has to
omit a lot of reality when pretending to talk politics. CNN quoting Fiorina,
"Well I don't think John McCain could run a major corporation, I don't
think Barack Obama could run a major corporation, I don't think Joe
Biden could run a major corporation." It must be very sad to be Katha
Pollitt. It's even sadder to have to read her (no link to trash so no
link to Katha). Long after the election's over, feminists will be
addressing what went down and Liars for Barack like Katha will be the
new Susan Brownmillers (and that's not anything to wish for, read Susan
Faludi's Backlash). And since Katha crossed my
line-you-do-not-cross (special needs children), let me toss out that
each passing day finds Katha looking more and more like Bill Clinton's
ugly brother. And for Katha's friend who sometimes e-mails, ask Katha
to watch her words about special needs children before you beg me not
to comment on Katha's Butt Ugly-ness. Meanwhile Mollie (Get Religion) explains how the press regularly distorts Palin's religion and, no surprise there, she just had to look to the Los Angeles Times. Barack participated in a two-party presidential 'debate on Friday. Susan (Random Thoughts) offers this evaluation,
"Thank God it's over. I call it a draw; both were equally boring,
equally deceptive, equally unfit for the job of president." Klownhaus notes the Cult reaction and attempts to break it down for TalkLeft's Jeralyn: "Do you want to know what the difference between spinning and outright lying is? There isn't one." Patrick Martin (WSWS) found the debate underscored
"that there is no choice in the 2008 presidential election within the
confines of the official two-party system. Two candidates stood facing
each other, espousing nearly identical positions in defense of Wall
Street and American militarism which would, in any other country in the
world, immediately identify them as representatives of the ultra-right.
. . . Obama said that the lesson of Iraq was 'we should never hesitate
to use military force, and I will not, as president, in order to keep
the American people safe, never hesitate to use military force'."
Asked by moderator Jim Lehrer ("how do you see the lessons of Iraq,
Senator Obama?"), Barack responded, "So I think the lesson to be drawn
is that we should never hesitate to use military force, and I will not,
as president, in order to keep the American people safe. But we have to
use our military wisely. And we did not use our military wisely in
Iraq." That was a good catch by Martin and one I honestly missed.
After the question is asked by Lehrer, Barack takes six paragraphs to
get that point (six paragraphs according to CNN transcript). Speaking to PBS' Ray Suarez following the debate (transcript
and audio), presidential historian Michael Beschloss noted that "John
McCain was repeatedly on the offensive and, to some extent, Obama was
on the defensive. I was surprised by that. In terms of strategy,
we'll see what works. But oftentimes in debates, if a candidate does
go on the offensive, it does tend to work. That's what Kennedy did in
1960. It's what Ronald Reagan did in 1980. And it is what Bill
Clinton did in 1992." PBS' Washington Week did two broadcast on Friday instead of their usual one. The first was pre-debate (standout there was the Washington Post's Dan Balz reporting from the debate location) and the second was a post-debate discussion. From the second broadcast: Gwen Ifill: I was struck Michele that Barack Obama didn't seem to have much of an answer to that experience question. Michelle
Norris (NPR): I was surprised because it was basically John McCain's
closing statement. He said that he had been involved in virtually
every major national security crisis over the last 25 years and he
said directly -- Gwen Ifill: He named half the leaders he'd met with. Michele
Norris: Yes. And he said I don't think Barack Obama has the experience
or the judgment to be president and Jim Lehrer didn't say anything and
basically let Barack Obama respond and the first thing he said was my
father came from Kenya It was not directly dealing with that and I was
very surprised by that. It isn't who won. It's what won. Always ask after you watch a debate, not who won, but what lost and what won. Militarism won. Boondoggle star wars won. Corruption won. Corporate crime won. Bailouts for Wall Street won. Nuclear power won. Aggressive NATO won. What Lost? Peace advocates lost. Consumers lost. Workers lost. Solar energy really lost. You
ought to ask what they don't talk about, what they ignore, what they
avoid. Both of these candidates are vying to get into the White House
so they can take orders from their corporate paymasters. That's
what it's all about. Corporate government or the people's government?
That's why we're running: to make a people's government. When
you ask what won you get a clear view that these two candidates are
really afraid of challenging corporate power. It's our job to make them
more afraid of the people than big business.
Video of Ralph's critique can be viewed here. KPFK broadcast the debates ( click here for KPFK archives -- it's Friday under "Special Programming" at 5:03 p.m.) with commentary provided by, among others, Sonali Kolhatkar (host of Uprising)
who stated, "I think Obama lost a lot of opportunities to strike back
at McCain. Obama was on the defensive, as you said, Obama sounded like
he was on the defensive and overall, I think, the debate was quite a
bit more boring than I think most people thought." The only worthwhile
guest not running for office was Chris Hedges who noted of the debate,
"A lot of empty talk. It's pretty clear nothing's going to change in
Iraq. Both candidates are going to ramp up the war in Afghanistan.
Neither of them would address the real issues in the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict because their hands are tied by the
Israeli lobby and the Israeli government." You can also laugh at many
crackpots if you listen (Dr. Drew -- and add counting to the many
skills Dr. Drew lacks). You can hear Sonali's co-host Ian Masters --
aka Babbling Brook or maybe just "Trainwreck" -- utilize non-stop
sexism in his 'commentary' on this week's debate (the one that hasn't
taken place). It wasn't just enough that he deploy SEXISM against
Palin, after Cynthia McKinney was off the air he mocked her and called
her "loopy" for her Florida analysis which, for the record, was
correct. Ian Masters is a sexist idiot. It's pathetic that KPFK aired
that embarrassment. It's linked for three reasons. 1) Audio for those
who want to listen to the debate. 2) Cynthia McKinney. 3) Ralph
Nader. Sonali asked Cynthia whether she supported the withdrawal of US
troops from Afghanistan and Iraq? Cynthia
McKinney: Absolutely, there's no way that -- I think the Democrats and
the Republicans are on the wrong track when they say that we need to
have more troops in Afghanistan. No. the people of Afghanistan don't
want more missiles, more deaths, more bombs, more violence. They want
peace. They want justice. They want self-determination. And that is
what the United States ought to be offering the people of Afghanistan.
And they want legitimate government which Ha mad Karzi does not
represent. Asked of differences between the Democratic Party and the Republican Party, Cynthia replied: Well
of course I understand the Democratic Party very well after having
served four years in the Georgia legislature as a Democrat and after
having served twelve years in the United States Congress as a
Democrat. What I can say is that voters never lose when they vote
their values and that is really the message that we should be sending.
And for voters who might be torn because of what the corporate press
has told them to support -- the corporate political parties about the
election of 2000, basically what has been told to voters has been told
to them in an effort to prevent them from voting their values because
if they voted their values and their values included peace then they
would not vote Democrat or Republican, they would vote Green. . . . If
their values were social justice, they would not vote Democrat or
Republican, they would vote Green. And what the corporate press has
failed to tell us is that the corporate political parties were engaged
in the rankest form of disenfranchisement to the tune of one million
Black people all over the United States being disenfranchised, being
denied the right to have their votes counted in 2000. 78,000 of them
were right there in the state of Florida and the Democratic Party did
nothing to protect the right of their own voters, which the Black
community represents, to have their votes counted. And then in 2004,
the further insult was made by John Kerry who made a commitment, a
recorded commitment, that we weren't going to see a repeat of 2000
where one million Black people had their votes not counted and then
despite the fact that reports were coming in from Ohio of tremendous
disenfranchisement in the Black community, John Kerry conceded the very
next day. Ralph
Nader: I think something needs to be done for the millions of home
owners who are going to be foreclosed. There are a lot of good ways to
save them from losing their homes. The progressive economist Dean
Baker in Washington suggests that they be allowed to rent their homes
until the situation is stabilized -- rather than be evicted from their
homes, they become tenants so that's one approach. But by and large
the White House has not made the case that there needs to be a gigantic
bailout and Congress is not investigating having a series hearing of
deliberative hearings the way they did for a tiny bail out of Chrysler
in 1979. So they haven't made the case and if there is to be a bailout
they haven't shown what kind of bailout, how much is needed, should it
be injection of capital, how do they evaluate the distressed assets,
how are they going to pay for it, when are they going to pay for it.
It's nothing but a blank check. $700 billion. George Bush wants. King
George the IV, and that's it. This is dictatorial rule-making and
unfortunately the Democrats with a few tweaks here and there are going
to roll over. -Demand the absolute moratorium on foreclosures that some people have already envisioned might be needed. -Demand a moratorium on apartment evictions. -Encourage
our friends and neighbors to truly evaluate their resources now, a few
days or weeks before something happens: Make a network with 3 or 4
family members. Where would everyone go, who would they live with, if
one by one they got kicked out of their homes? -Start thinking of
laws to propose, or amendments to this bailout bill, that either punish
landlords with residential property not rented out, or make squatting
rules so simple that there will not be empty apartments rotting around
the country, while some people are homeless and looking for a place to
lie their head. -Start thinking about a way to put a moratorium
on the enforcement of "keeping my neighborhood affluent laws" such as
in the town I live in, where it is illegal to have a home with two
front doors. Or, rules that only one family can live in a home. (Which
should be well thought out, I realize. Because, they could be
misapplied by bad landlords to overcrowd, or create burdens that make
impossible parking/traffic situations if there is not an emergency.) We're working that topic back to the presidential election via US House Rep Dennis Kucinich. On Democracy Now! today, he revealed that Barack Obama was said, by House Democrats not to want bankruptcy protection for the home owners: Amy Goodman: Congressman Kucinich,
can you explain how it is that the Democrats are in charge, yet the
Democrats back down on their demand to give bankruptcy judges authority
to alter the terms of mortgages for homeowners facing foreclosure, that
Democrats also failed in their attempt to steer a portion of any
government profits from the package to affordable housing programs?
Dennis Kucinich: Well, I mean, those
are two of the most glaring deficiencies in this bill. And I would
maintain there was never any intention to -- you know, well, many
members of Congress had the intention of helping people who were in
foreclosure. You know, this -- Wall Street doesn't want to do that.
Wall Street wants to grab whatever change they can and equity that's
left in these properties. So -- Amy Goodman: Right, but the Democrats are in charge of this.
Dennis
Kucinich: Right. You know, I'll tell you something that we were told in
our caucus. We were told that our presidential candidate, when the
negotiations started at the White House, said that he didn't want this
in this bill. Now, that's what we were told. Amy Goodman: You were told that Barack Obama did not want this in the bill?
Dennis
Kucinich: That he didn't want the bankruptcy provisions in the bill.
Now, you know, that's what we were told. And I don't understand why he
would say that, if he did say that. And I think that there is a--the
fact that we didn't put bankruptcy provisions in, that actually we
removed any hope for judges to do any loan modifications or any
forbearance. There's no moratorium on mortgage foreclosures in here.
So, who's getting --who's really getting helped by this bill? This is a
bailout, pure and simple, of Wall Street interests who have been
involved in speculation. Hardly
surprising considering where Barack's campaign money comes from. But
see if that gets any more news traction than Biden's speaking error did
last week. Barack and John got to stand on stage in a so-called
presidential debate. Shut out were presidential candidates Cynthia McKinney, Ralph Nader, Bob Barr and Chuck Baldwin. Team Nader reports
that Trevor Lyman is attempting to organize a debate in NYC for
McKinney, Nader, Barr and Baldwin as well as (invited even if they
don't show) Barack and McCain. Lyman explains:
"Please join us for a third party candidate debate and money bomb (date
to be announced as we approach 10,000 pledges mark, location in New
York City). All of the major candidates will be invited to participate.
The event will be broadcast via BreakTheMatrix.com
and many others (details to come). Remember, all of America is on the
Internet. Together we can break the media blackout on third party
candidates. Be sure to tell your friends and family to tune in." And
before any e-mails come in, no, all of America is not online.
Posted at 03:14 pm by thecommonills
Permalink
Kat's Korner: Hold Me Down
Kat: In a really bad summer of music, there were a few bright spots. Take Augustana. Everything's that missing in Coldplay's Viva La Vida can be found on Agustana's Can't Love, Can't Hurt. Is it art?  It's not anything you'd want to hang on a wall but do most things on your wall get your heart pumping and your ass shaking? Augustana's "Boston" (heavily featured in Scrubs) put them on the radar but it's the live shows that are putting them on the map. Can't Love, Can't Hurt is so far beyond 2005's All the Stars and Boulevards that it frequently doesn't even sound like the same group. Seeing them live will only confuse you further. I caught the band live this spring when they were early into their tour and again later this summer when they were a support act. If there's a better arena and shed band to emerge this year, I've missed out. Live the new songs are a little rougher and a lot more thumpin'. So much so that I'm expecting the next album to be another huge leap for the band. This growth may make listening to the latest CD a disappointment if you catch them live first; however, Can't Love, Can't Hurt provides you with "Hey Now" and "Sweet Low." The first is a rocker (or sounds like it until you hear them perform it live -- again, they're reworking the album on the road). It's also a song lyrically that clues you in: "Chris Martin has entered his Rod Stewart phase but we're making music." They certainly are. "Sweet and Low" is probably the best written, best performed and best produced track on the CD. "Sweet and Low" is the song that everyone's going to be cited as their favorite song when the next CD carries Augustana to the top ranks. It's got everything a classic rock song needs, the vocal aching with lust, the chords that fire up just when they're needed. Look for millions of women (and probably a a number of men) to claim two or so years from now, "Oh, yeah, Augustana? Back in 2008, I was like 'hold me down'? Oh, yeah, Dan Layus, I'll hold you down all right!" Anywhere you go, anyone you meet Remember that your eyes, can be your enemies I said, hell is so Close, and heaven's out of reach But i ain't givin' up quite yet I've got too much to lose Hold me down, sweet and low, little girl Hold me down, sweet and low, and I'll carry you home Hold me down, sweet and low, little girl Hold me down and I'll carry you home The rain is gonna fall The sun is gonna shine The wind is gonna blow The water's gonna rise She said, when that day comes, Look into my eyes, no one's givin' up quite yet, we've go too much to lose Hold me down, sweet and low, little girl Hold me down, sweet and low, and I'll carry you home Hold me down, sweet and low, little girl Hold me down and I'll carry you All the way "Carry me all the way," Layus sings in that song and the energy completely carries it and the CD. On the slow-tempo "Fire," energy is really all that the band has going for it and they put it across. If you haven't caught the band live, you'll love Can't Love, Can't Hurt. If you've caught them live, you know they've already moved beyond it. In which case, I suggest you skip the regular version of Can't Love, Can't Hurt and instead purchase the deluxe version which includes four additional tracks -- two are videos. "Hey Now" and "Sweet and Low" acoustic are more than enough, even after sweating through one of their high intensity performances, to get you excited all over again. agustana can't love, can't hurtcoldplaykats kornerthe common ills sweet and low
Posted at 06:20 am by thecommonills
Permalink
Kucinich says Barack doesn't want to protect people from bankruptcy
Basil Adas' " US ready to discuss immunity clause, Iraqi lawmaker says" ( Gulf News)
covers the continued efforts to of the White House and the puppet
government in Baghdad to push through a treaty (circumventing the US
Senate and the US Consitution, though the Iraqi Parliament will
supposedly be able to give a thumbs up or thumbs down)masquerading as a
SOFA. Adas reports that the issue of the immunity of US troops is
something the US now signals they're willing to discuss according to
the Kurdistan Alliance's Feriad Rawanduz who is hopeful that a treaty
can be pushed through before the end of the year. Abdul Aziz al Hakim
tells Adas that possibly their could be a judicial body comprised of
both Iraqis and Americans who would rule on the actions of individual
US service members. Ryan Crocker, US Ambassador to Iraq, is optimistic
and claims the 'movement' is some sort of rebuke to Iran (from Iraq). Adas
says the path after a treaty is drawn up is the Executive Board, then
the National Security Council and the Iraqi Parliament. Finally, Adas
notes: "Meanwhile, Defence Minister Abdul Qader Jasem Mohammad
confirmed yesterday that Washington had offered a number of Beechcraft
spy planes to bolster the Iraqi security forces." The US began a heavy diplomatic push last week. John Daniszewski interviews Crocker for the AP, " US ambassador appeals for patience in Iraq," in which Crocker attempts to portray Iran as the culprit for the lack of a treaty called a SOFA so far: "If
we decide we are tired of it, if we decide we don't want to do it
anymore and that it is time to turn our attention to other things, this
could all go the other way," Crocker warned. "And it is certainly my
sense as someone who has served in the Middle East for the better part
of three decades, that you would pay a major long-term price."He
suggested it could be seen as a repeat of the U.S. withdrawal from
Lebanon in the early 1980s, a move that led countries like Iran and
Syria to draw assumptions about U.S. lack of resolve and to embrace an
attitude of defiance. "These kinds of actions have profound and very
far-reaching consequences," he said.The
talks on the military pact have hit an impasse recently over U.S.
insistence on retaining sole legal jurisdiction over American troops
and differences over a schedule for the departure of the U.S. military.
Iraqi officials have said that they want all foreign troops out by the
end of 2011.Crocker, 59,
who became ambassador in March 2007 and who is expected to leave his
post around the end of the Bush administration, is one of the most
experienced diplomats in the Middle East. He has served as ambassador
in Lebanon, Syria and Kuwait, and was ambassador to Pakistan before his
appointment to Iraq.He said it is becoming obvious that Iran wants the current negotiations to fail. Today on Democracy Now!
(about to start airing), the second segment of the US House Rep Dennis
Kucinich interview will find Kucinich revealing that Barack Obama
didn't want bankruptcy provisions in the bill to address the economic
meltdown. Kucinich says he was told that by a caucus member. Otherwise Democracy Now!
is pure Cult of St. Barack, as usual. There are no reps from the
campaigns of Ralph Nader, Cynthia McKinney, Bob Barr, Chuck Baldwin or
John McCain, nor any supporters of them. Most surprising is the issue
of McCain due to the fact Amy Goodman is yet again going after a Barack
opponent day after day and never providing them with a means to speak.
She did that with Hillary's campaign during the primaries. That's not
'news' and it's not 'public affairs.' It is one-side propaganda. The New York Times'
Adam Cohen shows up to push Barack yet again but what else does anyone
expect from that paper? And Goody gets in snark at Governor Sarah Palin
(McCain's running mate). Asked if she would be willing to go into
Pakistan, Palin issues a qualifier (an "If . . . then" statement) and
follows the qualifier with "absolutely." Goody renders it as
"absolutely" and listen to the self-amused snark in Goody's voice
following the playing of the clip. Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts " Boys Do Cry" went up this morning as did Kat's latest CD review, " Kat's Korner: Chris Martin's cold play."
Kat's next review goes up after this and I'm grabbing a photo from
Wikipedia because I don't have the time to scan the cover this morning.
I'll replace it with a scan later in the week. This is from Team Nader: Breaking News: Third Party Debate Posted by The Nader Team on Saturday, September 27, 2008 at 11:34:00 PM ShareThisShareThis Trevor Lyman is the man who organized the Ron Paul money bombs. One Lyman money bomb raised $4 million in one day. Another raised $6 million in one day. Now, Lyman is at it again. Lyman wants to hold a third party debate in New York City. Lyman was inspired by Ron Paul's press conference a couple of weeks ago.
At that press conference, Paul called on his followers to ditch the two
major parties and throw their support to one of the independent or
third party candidates. So, we all need to support Lyman's push for an alternative debate now. If Lyman gets 10,000 pledges by October 8, he and the other sponsors will organize a debate in New York City. All major candidates -- Nader, Barr, McKinney, Baldwin, Obama and McCain will be invited. Already, with no publicity, Lyman has close to 1,000 pledgers. So go to thirdpartyticket.com now.
And add your name to the pledge list. You don't have to say how much you are pledging. Just add your name. The Commission on Presidential Debates won't let Ralph debate. So, let's get behind Trevor Lyman's push now.
Let's crank it up. And get it done.
Onward to November The Nader Team PS: Third partyticket.com is being sponsored by Lyman's group breakthematrix.com, the Chicago-based Free and Equal Elections, and Open Debates. ShareThisShareThis On debates, Lauren notes this from Team Nader: It Isn't Who Won. It's What Won. It isn't who won. It's what won.
Always ask after you watch a debate, not who won, but what lost and what won.
Militarism won. Boondoggle star wars won. Corruption won. Corporate crime won. Bailouts for Wall Street won. Nuclear power won. Aggressive NATO won. What Lost?Peace advocates lost.Consumers lost.Workers lost.Solar energy really lost.You
ought to ask what they don't talk about, what they ignore, what they
avoid. Both of these candidates are vying to get into the White House
so they can take orders from their corporate paymasters.That's
what it's all about. Corporate government or the people’s government?
That's why we're running: to make a people's government.When
you ask what won you get a clear view that these two candidates are
really afraid of challenging corporate power. It's our job to make them
more afraid of the people than big business. Watch a video of the statement at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1WS5Yhy_ySk
ShareThisShareThis The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com. iraq basil adas john daniszewskithe world today just nutskats korner
Posted at 06:18 am by thecommonills
Permalink
Last night, we noted Tina Susman's " Iraq bombings kill 31" ( Los Angeles Times) and in this morning's New York Times, Sam Dagher and Muhammed al-Obaidi offer " Holiday Bombings Kill 27 in Baghdad"
(the first report filed from Iraq to make it into the paper since
Thursday morning's edition) and on one Baghdad bombing, they note: Mizher
Abed Hanoush, a Shurta resident, said the attack took place near a
Shiite house of worship, or husseiniya, now occupied by the Iraqi Army.Mr.
Hanoush said the husseiniya previously had served as the local base of
the Mahdi Army militia of Moktada al-Sadr, the anti-American Shiite
cleric. It was taken over by the army in the aftermath of battles this
year between Iraqi and American forces and the militia in Baghdad and
the south.Mr. Hanoush
echoed concerns voiced by many Iraqis in recent weeks about the
fragility of the security situation in Baghdad. "The situation is
turning to the worse again, I do not know why," he said.AP notes that the death toll from yesterday's bombings have climbed to at least 35. Meanwhile, AFP quotes
Nouri al-Maliki on the state of the Iraqi military -- or rather, quotes
his office quoting al-Maliki -- declaring, "We see that our forces have
a high level of capability and this makes us feel proud and honored,
but we want the performance to be complete so that they don't need
(external) support." The puppet's also in the news for the lack of
protections for Iraq's religious minorities in the provincial elections
legislation that Parliament voted on last week. Sunday, Iraqi
Christians took to the streets in hundreds to protest. " Iraq PM seeks safeguards for Christians" ( Reuters)
notes that al-Maliki says things need to be added and that the
Parliament points out there was no census so they had no hard numbers
to work with. al-Maliki's making a show of saying the Parliament needs
to fix it when the reality is that bill barely passed last week and a
similar bill in July led to walk outs. The article notes:
Iraq's
Christian communities, as well as smaller minority sects such as
Yazidis in northern Iraq, have tried to stay out of the fray during
years of sectarian fighting. But churches have been attacked and two
Yazidi villages were struck by truck bombs a year ago in the deadliest
strike of the war. Cardinal Emmanuel III Delly, leader of Iraq's Chaldean Catholics, called for the presidency council to intervene. "I
call on the presidency council not to approve the cancellation of
article 50 of the provincial law, which is an oppression against our
presence and representation in Iraqi society," he said in a television
interview on Saturday. Shamiram Daniali offers " Iraqi Parliament Betrayed the Persecuted Assyrian Christians" ( Assyria Times): Just
when we thought things cannot possibly go any worse for the most
persecuted population of Iraq, its indigenous people who are Assyrian
Christians, we witnessed the biggest injustice yet by the Iraqi
Parliament.On September 24,
2008, the Iraqi Parliament eliminated article 50 of the Provincial
Election Law, which had adopted on July 22, 2008. That article
guaranteed the quotas (specific number of seats) in the governorate's
regional councils for the minorities, including the Assyrian
Christians. The Governorate Council Elections will be held on January
31, 2009.The bill is now
passed to be reviewed and approved by the Iraqi Presidium committee,
President Jalal Talabani and his two Vice Presidents. Elimination of
the article 50 means that Assyrians, as the indigenous people of Iraq,
and other minorities will permanently lose their rights to have
representation in the Regional Councils in the 14 regions. For the time
being, three regions in northern Iraq (Kirkuk, Arbil and Soleymaniya)
will not be holding regional elections.This
gross stump on democracy by the very parliamentarians, who are sworn to
bring democracy to Iraq, has caused turmoil among the Assyrians of
Iraq. Many of them protested against this bill by holding
demonstrations against this post war dictatorship.Daniali concludes the column with the belief that the bill will be rejected by the presidency council. Sabina notes something from Team Nader that we'll include in both of this morning's entries: Breaking News: Third Party Debate Posted by The Nader Team on Saturday, September 27, 2008 at 11:34:00 PM ShareThisShareThis Trevor Lyman is the man who organized the Ron Paul money bombs. One Lyman money bomb raised $4 million in one day. Another raised $6 million in one day. Now, Lyman is at it again. Lyman wants to hold a third party debate in New York City. Lyman was inspired by Ron Paul's press conference a couple of weeks ago.
At that press conference, Paul called on his followers to ditch the two
major parties and throw their support to one of the independent or
third party candidates. So, we all need to support Lyman's push for an alternative debate now. If Lyman gets 10,000 pledges by October 8, he and the other sponsors will organize a debate in New York City. All major candidates -- Nader, Barr, McKinney, Baldwin, Obama and McCain will be invited. Already, with no publicity, Lyman has close to 1,000 pledgers. So go to thirdpartyticket.com now.
And add your name to the pledge list. You don't have to say how much you are pledging. Just add your name. The Commission on Presidential Debates won't let Ralph debate. So, let's get behind Trevor Lyman's push now.
Let's crank it up. And get it done.
Onward to November The Nader Team PS: Third partyticket.com is being sponsored by Lyman's group breakthematrix.com, the Chicago-based Free and Equal Elections, and Open Debates. ShareThisShareThis And Kayla notes this from Team Nader: Your Soapbox -- Announcing Freedom Writers Posted by The Nader Team on Saturday, September 27, 2008 at 11:23:00 AM ShareThisShareThis Were
you disgusted by the sound bite debate you had to endure last night?
Did you wish there was someone on stage who was actually addressing
substantive issues instead of trading resumes and platitudes? Outraged
by the fact that third parties are deliberately and systematically
excluded from public discourse and that millions of Americans
consequently don't know that they can vote for real reform? If you are, sign up to join Freedom Writers,
the Nader campaign to end media bigotry by demanding that radio,
television and newspaper stations cover third party candidates. We need
you to help us break through the media blockade and bring real issues
and solutions to the people! Join Freedom Writers today.
Onward.
The Nader Team
ShareThisShareThis The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com. iraqthe los angeles timestina susman the new york times sam dagher muhammed al-obaidi shamiram daniali
Posted at 06:16 am by thecommonills
Permalink
Sunday, September 28, 2008
And the war drags on . . .
Did you hear? The Iraq War is over. It apparently ended Thursday or that's what the New York Times thinks. Thursday was the last day they bothered to print an article filed from Iraq. None Friday, none Saturday and none Sunday. So the illegal war has appparently ended. Or, at least, their attention to it. War is over . . . if like the Times you pretend it is. Which goes a long way towards explaining how two presidential candidates, both vying for their first term in the White House, can get away with saying that, if elected, they won't end the illegal war by 2013 but, if elected and if American then elects them to a second term, the illegal war MIGHT end. At least John McCain's not passing himself off as the 'anti-war' choice. But both Barack Obam and John McCain refuse to pledge to end the illegal war, if elected, in their first term. And the peace movement takes it. Used to, the peace movement thought they were being generous with a year to end the illegal war. Now two heavily promoted candidates in the press both argue that if Americans give them their votes, if Americans elect one of them into the White House, for the next four years the illegal war will drag on. But, give them two terms and it might end. And the most the peace movement can do is hiss at McCain while refusing to call out Barack. Iraqis are frequently quoted stating things in Iraq aren't going to change under McCain or Barack. Iraqis are apparently not only smarter than the US peace movement, they're also more honest. They're just there to try and make the people free, But the way that they're doing it, it don't seem like that to me. Just more blood-letting and misery and tears That this poor country's known for the last twenty years, And the war drags on.-- words and lyrics by Mick Softly (available on Donovan's Fairytale) Last Sunday, ICCC's number of US troops killed in Iraq since the start of the illegal war hit the 4,168 was the number. And tonight? 4174. Saturday the US military announced: "A Multi-National Division – Center Soldier died of wounds at approximately 1 p.m. as a result of a vehicle rollover accident southeast of Baghdad at approximately 9:28 this morning. The name of the Soldier is being withheld pending next of kin notification and release by Department of Defense." Just Foreign Policy's counter estimates the number of Iraqis killed since the start of the illegal war to be 1,267,401 up from . . . the same as last week. Turning to some of today's reported violence . . . Bombings? Mohammed Al Dulaimy (McClatchy Newspapers) reports a Baghdad roadside bombing today which claimed the life of 1 Iraqi soldier and left two more wounded, a Baghdad car bombing claimed 12 lives (thirty-five more wounded) and two other Baghdad car bombings claimed 20 lives with seventy-three more people left wounded, and a Diyala Province roadside bombing left Al Saidiyah mayor Ahmed Samir Zargush and five other people wounded. Saturday McClatchy's Laith Hammoudi reported a Baghdad car bombing that wounded three people (including one police officer). Shootings? Mohammed Al Dulaimy (McClatchy Newspapers) reports Iraqi police say the US "shot randomlly" in Baghdad today wounded two Iraqi civilians and 1 Christian was shot dead in Nineveh Province while another man was shot dead in Mosul and his brother left wounded. Saturday McClatchy's Laith Hammoudi reported an armed clash in Jalawla that claimed the life of 1 police officer and 1 "member of Kurdistan Democratic Party." Corpses? Mohammed Al Dulaimy (McClatchy Newspapers) reports 2 corpses discovered in Baghdad. Saturday McClatchy's Laith Hammoudi reported 1 corpse discovered in Baghdad. On today's violence, Tina Susman's " Iraq bombings kill 31" ( Los Angeles Times) reports: The violence and the protests showed the tensions that still exist in Iraq despite progress on security and political reconciliation. The blasts were particularly jarring because they came around sunset, when the markets are filled with people buying food for the evening meal that breaks their daylong fast during the holy month of Ramadan."We are innocent and peaceful people. Why are they targeting markets and shoppers?" asked Hidar Abdulhussein, who suffered a broken leg in a bombing at a market in west Baghdad."How were they able to get in? There are so many army and police checkpoints," he said, referring to security forces around most major Baghdad marketplaces.How are they able to get in? One thing in many reports last week was "Awakening" Council members on strike at checkpoints, waiving anyone through, due to the fact that an arrest warrant was said to be out on the member or the member's leader. Susman also notes that Iraqi Christians staged a protest today over the provincial election legislation from last week which "does not guarantee minorities seats on provincial councils." AP notes that "hundreds of Christians staged protests" today in Iraq and those protests were probably most effective on the world stage. al-Maliki's shown no concern for the rights of any of the religious minorities in Iraq; however, the puppet knows that persecution of Christians won't play well with the Americans still supporting the Iraq War so he moved quickly to insist that he supports seats in Parliament being reserved for religious minorities. Sadly, some will play that development out as if it matters. It doesn't matter at all. Parliament voted on the bill, it is sent to the presidency council who will either sign off on it (making it law) or reject it. al-Maliki's way too late to impact anything unless the bill is rejected and the Parliament takes another shot at it. New content at Third: Truest statement of the week Truest statement of the week II Editorial: What a friend the left has in Barack A note to our readers TV: Do Not Disturb The Propaganda TV: One ticket gets a pass, the other doesn't The campaign with momentum Sexism and the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame TV: The 'debate' The New Adventures of Old Christine MyTV's Fascist House: Princess Tiny Meat Chronicles Coming Up HighlightsAlso, Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts " Boys Do Cry" went up this morning as did Kat's latest CD review, " Kat's Korner: Chris Martin's cold play." Pru e-mails to ask if she's greedy to request two highlights? Not at all. First up: This article should be read after: » Thousands in Manchester to protest against the warVoices of resistance call for troops to come home Anti-war demonstrators in Manchester spoke to Sian Ruddick "If you don't speak up, nothing's going to change," said Falak, a young woman from Liverpool. "The threats to Iran and the trouble in Pakistan show that this war isn't over. And there's oil and gas pipelines near Georgia. We don't need another war for oil." Katherine Moffat from Leeds was on her first demonstration. "You hear so much on the news, but I think the people here have a lot to teach people," she said. Shin Sharma, also from Leeds, added, "We need the unconditional withdrawal of all British and American troops. The main enemy is here at home -- the British state." Logan McGeary travelled up from north London to join the demo. "I came on the two million strong 15 February 2003 demonstration," she told Socialist Worker. "I didn't believe the lies they told us then – and we've just seen it getting even worse. "I have nieces and nephews who are in their teens and I don't want them to grow up in a world where war is commonplace or for them to be recruited by the army. “Regardless of who’s in power, we have to keep up the pressure. The troops are so demoralised. You can't talk about boosting morale in these circumstances. You have to bring them home." Jesse Oldershaw is a member of the UCU lecturers' union at University College London. "Our success at kicking military recruitment off our campus last year showed me that if you organise you can have a real effect on the world. "Demonstrations are a show of force -- but they are also a space for organising and discussion. They give people confidence to be together. On the coach here we were all organising the campaign for this academic year." The following should be read alongside this article: » Thousands in Manchester to protest against the war» email article » comment on article » printable version© Copyright Socialist Worker (unless otherwise stated). You may republish if you include an active link to the original and leave this notice in place. If you found this article useful please help us maintain SW by » making a donation.Pru's second highlight (also from Great Britain's Socialist Worker), is " John Pilger: This conflict is repeating the historical patterns of imperialism:" Veteran investigative journalist John Pilger is warning that the extension of the Afghanistan war into Pakistan has grim echoes of the past. "There are striking parallels between US actions in Afghanistan and Pakistan with spread of Vietnam war into Cambodia and Laos," he told Socialist Worker. "Indeed, there is an historical pattern -- whenever an imperial power gets stuck in one region, it will try to attack another, often disastrously. Caesar and Napoleon did just that. "The Americans in Vietnam, deeply frustrated by a resistance they never bargained on, sought an easy conquest in Cambodia on a flimsy pretext. That was in 1970. "The US invasion and carpet bombing of Cambodia acted as a catalyst for the rise and rise of Pol Pot’s Khmer Rouge forces. Without US secretary of state Henry Kissinger and president Richard Nixon, Pol Pot would not have succeeded." The Khmer Rouge emerged out of the chaos of the US war on Cambodia. Their rule was marked by brutality and mass murder. John Pilger warns that the US and its allies could do the same to Pakistan today. "What George Bush and Dick Cheney are likely to achieve in Pakistan is the rise and rise of the Taliban and the rapid radicalising of 'mainstream' Islamic forces within the country." Pilger says the impact of these new wars is "likely to favour tough guy John McCain". But he adds, "The longing for relief from war and insecurity in the US cannot be underestimated -- and Barack Obama is likely to be the beneficiary of that, however undeserved." John Pilger will be presenting his film about Afghanistan, Breaking the Silence, in London on Friday of this week at a Socialist Worker Appeal event. He will be taking questions from the audience after the showing. One reason why John made a film about Afghanistan was the difficulty of getting serious documentaries onto TV these days. "In every survey of what the public wants from TV in Britain, the one constant is the demand for documentaries that make sense of the world," says John. "But TV bosses inevitably perceive ‘public taste’ in relation to 'the market'. Big Brother may be mortally wounded in the ratings, but successors are being planned that are mutations of that form. "That said, there are some marvellous documentary makers coming up, bypassing TV and heading straight for the cinema -- which is where documentary began." » email article » comment on article » printable version© Copyright Socialist Worker (unless otherwise stated). You may republish if you include an active link to the original and leave this notice in place. If you found this article useful please help us maintain SW by » making a donation.The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com. iraqand the war drags ondonovanmcclatchy newspaperslaith hammoudithe los angeles timestina susmanthe socialist workerthe third estate sunday reviewthe world today just nutskats korner
Posted at 11:35 pm by thecommonills
Permalink
Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "Boys Do Cry"
Posted at 11:16 pm by thecommonills
Permalink
Kat's Korner: Chris Martin's cold play
Kat: I really fear for Gwenth Paltrow. I don't know her, I'm not a fan. Take out The Royal Tennenbaums and you're left with a slew of movies I'd never see. But there's one role she's likely to be cast in that I wouldn't wish on anyone: modern day Yoko. Listening to Coldplay's hugely disappointing Viva La Vida, it was obvious that someone was going to have to take the fall and that the day of reckoning loomed. The summer release was tightly embraced and heavily praised by music critics and dee jays desperate for actual music -- that would require playing an instrument. Because the band can actually play instruments, Viva La Vida was said to be the thing we all have a stake in. A stake in? Like the current economic meltdown, it appears a lot of musical experts were in willful denial. The disappointing Viva La Vida follows up the disappointing X & Y. The only improvement is that the latest album seems to grasp that dynamics are really what put Coldplay over. It wasn't the lyrics. It was the landscape of sound, the peaks and valleys, the hush and roar of various songs. X & Y would have been good album for a band like Bon Jovi that long ago lost its currency. But as the follow up to A Rush of Blood to the Head, X & Y served notice that Coldplay had been hugely overpraised and that the band didn't even grasp what had made it famous. Viva La Vida can be seen as band members thinking, "If Chris Martin wants to embarrass himself, he's on his own." Martin is singer. Sometimes he plays an instrument and, too often, he's responsible for writing the songs. The last strong song Coldplay recorded was the title track to A Rush of Blood to the Head. "I'm going to buy a gun and start a war . . . if you can tell me something worth fighting for . . ." Chris Martin is one of those artists who, after being primped by various stylists for the photo shoot, really tries hard to show some sort of enlightened pose in the accompanying text. But as various interviews have demonstrated (I'm especially thinking of an embarrassment in Mother Jones that ran several years ago), he can name check but does nothing to indicate depth. That's the reality of his lyric writing as well. The song I quoted was on an album released in August of 2002 -- before the start of the illegal war. Because many in the US didn't discover Coldplay until after the start of the Iraq War, a few wrongly thought Coldplay was making some form of contemporary comment. All this time later, Martin still hasn't. But look for him to name check sweat shop labor and assorted other issues in the never-ending attempts to prove himself deep. While no advocate of sweat shop labor, I think you can grasp on one listen to the latest product that Coldplay might benefit musically from a little sweat. On the plus, the band does sound like it's trying and that it's grasped the musical landscape they created on "A Rush of Blood to the Head" was as responsible for that song's lasting impact as were Martin's words. So it's a real shame that the producers (including the increasingly snooze-fest Brian Eno) have worked so hard to destroy any excitement. Viva La Vida not only sports no sweat, it's sterile and heartless. I believe Martin's vocals about as much as I believed Petula Clark really wanted to go to downtown. Like Clark, Martin chirps away in a confectionery manner. Usually when I think of how sorry the bulk of today's 'popular' music is, I think of the Disney Kids and the damage they've done. But it's equally true that a group like Coldplay creates their own musical landfill. They may, in fact, be more damaging because they're held up as examples and the real question there is: An example of what? The Rolling Stones, a British band that came along years earlier, could rock out. Even when addressing the world around them in a song like "Street Fighting Man," the Stones could rock out. Coldplay always seems on the verge of about to rock but stalling so Martin's lyric can make some deep point but, like the rocking out, no deep point ever comes. As the dismal recordings pile up, it's hard not to wish that Martin tried less for lofty and was more willing to come up with his own 'stupid girl' songs ("Under My Thumb," et al) because at least that might have some life in it. Somewhere around the half-way mark in the hideous "Lovers in Japan/Reign of Love," I realized Coldplay was all about indications. They lack the ability to actually feel or convey feeling so they indicate. It's like listening to the rock equivalent of America's Next Top Model as the boys try so desperately to be winners but have no grasp of what the prize actually is. If the whole point of Coldplay was to make Chris Martin a cover boy, consider the band a success. If the point was ever to make music that got you rocking on your feet or on the mattress, they're a failure. Thus far in the 21st century, it appears the marketing of the product is as close to art as music's going to get. The thing about hype is that it always comes back to bite you in the ass and, if Chris Martin doubts that, he should talk to the Knack. At some point in the near future, Coldplay's going to have to face the real critical judgment. When that day comes and a fall guy's needed, the easy target will probably be the actress Gwyneth Paltrow. However, assuming Gwyneth corrupted Chris requires that you first buy into the belief that he had originally had something worth offering. For the second album in a row, Viva La Vida argues that was never the case. coldplaykats kornerthe common ills
Posted at 11:11 pm by thecommonills
Permalink
Saturday, September 27, 2008
AFP reports that Jalawla today was the site of a raid by the Iraqi police on the Kuridsh pesh merga and, citing Salah Koikha ("spokesman for the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan"), 1 pesh merga member was killed during the raid. Reuters adds that 1 Iraqi police office officer died. The raid took place in Diyala Province where the pesh merga has prevented Iraqi forces from enterting certain areas such as Khanaquin (see Monday's snapshot). From India's Economic Times' " Oil wealth fans ethnic flames in Iraqi town:" In a mirror image of Kirkuk, the Kurdish town of Khanaqin near the border with Iran that holds sizeable oil reserves is being exposed to ethnic tensions and rival territorial claims. The local Kurdish political leadership warns that the area could see an ethnic explosion, as they call for Khanaqin to join the adjoining autonomous Kurdistan Regional Government (KRG) of northern Iraq. They want to rebuild the town through the international oil boom. "What we are telling the government is simple. Implement the constitutional provision for a referendum for people in Khanaqin to decide their future," said Mala Bakhtyar, a senior member of the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK), the Kurdish political party of Iraq's President Jalal Talabani. "If they don't do that, then there will be political trouble and military trouble. Yes, there will be an explosion of violence," he told a journalist touring the town in Diyala province. Along the 170-kilometre (110-mile) road from Baghdad to Khanaqin are grim reminders of trouble.
The New York Times takes the second day in print off from Iraq. Which is all the more hilarious when you consider the never-writes-about-Iraq Gail Collins shows up with an insufferable column today where she briefly marvels over how Iraq has fallen off the radar.
In some of today's violence, Reuters notes a Mosul car bombing that claimed 1 life, a Baghdad roadside bombing that injured one police officer, Iraqi soldiers shot dead 2 suspects in Mosul and a shooting attack on "a member of Baaj local council and his wife" in which the man wounded.
The following community sites have updated since Friday morning:
Rebecca's Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude;
Betty's Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man;
Cedric's Cedric's Big Mix;
Kat's Kat's Korner;
Mike's Mikey Likes It!;
Elaine's Like Maria Said Paz;
Wally's The Daily Jot;
Trina's Trina's Kitchen;
Ruth's Ruth's Report;
and Marcia's SICKOFITRADLZ
The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.
iraq
the new york times
like maria said paz
kats korner
sex and politics and screeds and attitude
thomas friedman is a great man
trinas kitchen
the daily jot
cedrics big mix
mikey likes it
ruths report
sickofitradlz
Posted at 11:07 pm by thecommonills
Permalink
Friday, September 26, 2008
Friday,
September 26, 2008. Chaos and violence continue, the US military
announced another death, did the Obama-Biden plan for Iraq slip out
accidentally, and more. Starting in Iraq. The
Parliament passed a bill for provincial elections that now awaits
approval (or rejection) by the presidency council. This afternoon, the
New York Times' Eric Owles posted at Baghdad Bureau an audio conversation between the paper's Iraq-based correspondents Alissa J. Rubin and Stephen Farrell discussing the bill. Excerpt: Alissa
J. Rubin: Well they were under pressure to pass a law actually three or
four months ago. The idea had originally been -- and the requirement
was that they would hold provincial elections by Oct. 1st. That was
in one of the previous laws they passed and I'm not, I cannot remember
in which one. And that, obviously, that deadline was missed when they
were unable to agree pretty much in May to an election law. And then
as the summer wore on it became clear that they may not even be able to
have them this year. But there was a gathering upset, some anger,
frustration from political groups that were not represented or are not
represented now in the provincial councils and there was a strong
feeling that if they wanted to maintain stability they needed to give
those people a place at the table -- at least, although perhaps not the
size place that they wanted but at least they have to include them in
some way. Stephen
Farrell: So it's not just a technical question, it actually matters for
the future stability of the country is that what you're -- Alissa
J. Rubin: Yes, it matters a great deal. And there are two levels on
which it matters. First, it matters because in some areas,
notably Anbar Province to some extent and in Salahuddin and in several
of the other northen provinces where there are large numbers of Sunnis
there is this new movement, the "Awakening" Councils which are more
tribal, local people, which are beginning to really represent a lot of
the interests of the people living in those areas but the provincial
councils which are the centers of power in these largely Sunni
provinces are dominated by one political party -- the Iraqi Islamic
Party -- and a few other smaller parties but that is the dominant one
and those people don't necessarily represent or don't, in some cases,
don't at all represent the people in the region. And so the "Awakeing"
Councils and the "Awakening" leaders would like to have a chance to be
elected and to weild power there. So that's very important and if they
don't weild power they will -- or if they aren't allowed to weild
power, there's a real risk that they will return to violence. Many of
them were insurgents, not all, but certainly some of them. And it would
not be a very representative situation. The same to some extent is true
in the south as well which is predominately Shia. You have a large
numbers of people loyal to Moqtada al-Sadr, the Shi'ite cleric, and
they're very much -- in some provinces they are absolutely the majority
and they don't have any place on the provincial councils or they have
just one or two seats and the council? Say thirty, thirty-five
members . So they are not able to influence how the council is
governed. So it's important for stability to have those people also
have their voices heard and be able to sort of plot the course of
events. Stephen
Farrell: The provincial election laws sounds incredibly technical but
what it seemed to me when I was thinking about it is that we hear all
the time out on the street out in the provinces that it's a bit like a
game of musical chairs. That the last time the music stopped four
years ago some people weren't sitting on a chair, some people weren't
in the room, some people weren't even in the country -- in those blunt
terms. Broadly speaking, is that roughly what we're talking about?
People demanding that the new reality on the ground be recognized. Alissa
J. Rubin: Absolutely that's what's happening and it's very important
not just for the provincial elections. But these provincial elections
are going to be something of a dress rehearsal for the national
elections -- the Parliamentary elections that will be held at the end
of 2009. And so it's quite important that more people be included
before those elections are held so that those elections also, or that
body, Parliament, begins to represent a bit better the country as a
whole. At the moment, there's still quite a few people left out. Many
of them didn't vote in the last election because they didn't want to
vote in the country that they viewed as an occupied nation -- occupied
by the Americans. So they abstained but the result is that they didn't
end up with any power and yet they are here and there more and more
influential for a variety of reasons depending upon which part of the
country you're in. Stephen
Farrell: So boiling it down, what we have is that the Sunnis would
argue the Kurds are very over represented in areas such as Mosul where
the Sunnis did not take part in the last round of elections and I think
that certain Sunni parties in Anbar who didn't even exist four years
ago would now be saying, "Well we are the Awakening. We are the ones
who brought peace to Anbar. It's time for the old guard to move aside
and for our contribution to the country to be recognized." I mean, in
effect, people crying out for recognition of realities of achievements
made over the last four years. Back to factions. Kurdish friend Peter W. Galbraith makes a series of hypothesis in " Is This a 'Victory'?" ( New York Review of Books) but
what should raise eye brows is a declaration he makes. (Someone get
Tom Hayden a chair. He'll need to sit down. We'll get to it.)
Galbraith sketches out a scenario where all the factions are in direct
competition and opposition. That's in part to his own desire to
represent the desires of the Kurdish region by advocating that Iraq not
be a nation but a federation. Tom-Tom's long had a problem with
Senator Joe Biden's support for a fedeartion. The popular term for
that, which Biden rejects, is "partition." Galbraith has long favored
a partition. This is not the Iraqis making that decision but it being
imposed upon them. (The Kurds have long favored partition.) Near the
end of the article, Galbraith -- an Obama inner-circle accolade of many
years -- makse some critiques of Sentator John McCain including: "He
has denounced the Obama-Biden plan for a decentralized state but has
said nothing about how he would protect Iraq's Kurds, the only
committed American allies in the country." What? The
Obama-Biden plan? That was once Biden's proposal, long before he was
on the Democratic Party's presidential ticket in the v.p. slot. But
Obama supports partitioning Iraq? Again, Galbraith is part of Barack's
inner circle. It's not fair to call him an "advisor" because he goes
so very far back. (He is the one who, in fact, introduced Barack to
Samantha Power in a kind of War Hawk mixer. Power, who, for the
record, also supports partition.) What was once the Biden plan,
Galbraith inadvertantly alerts, is now the Obama-Biden plan. Tuesday's snapshot
noted the Defense Dept press briefing by Lt Gen Lloyd Austin III where
he attempted to sell the October 1st 'inclusion' of (some of) the
"Awakening" Councils into the central government. NPR's JJ Sutherland
attempted to figure out what the 54,000 members being moved over means
and what their duties will be in Baghdad since, at present, they run
checkpoints. Repeatedly, Austin demonstrated no awareness of what
Sutherland was asking: JJ
Sutherland: Sir, I understand that but I'[m saying, "What happens in
October? I understand eventually you want to have them be plumbers or
electricians. But in October, there are a lot of checkpoints that have
been manned by the Sons of Iraq. Are those checkpoints all going to go
away? Are they only going to be staffed by Iraqi police now? That's
my question. It's not eventually, it's next month. Lt
Gen Lloyd Austin: Yeah. Next month the Iraqi government will begin to
work their way through this. And there's no question that some of
them, some of the checkpoints, many of the checkpoints, will be -- will
be manned by Iraqi security forces. In some cases, there may be Sons
of Iraq that will be taksed to help with that work. But in most cases,
I think the Iraqi government will be looking to transition people into
different types of jobs. Tim Cocks (Reuters) quotes
Maj Gen Jeffrey Hammond declaring in Baghdad today, "This cannot be
something that's allowed to fail. If the programme were to fail,
obviously these guys would be back out on the street, angry, al Qaeda
out recruiting them ... We don't need that." An Iraqi correspondent for McClatchy raises
the issue of the checkpoints noting, "The Iraqi people and especially
Baghdad is fed up with promises by officials and security commanders of
the improving of the security situation. Millions of students in
schools and universities started their new studying year this week
which will add more traffic in Baghdad and more targets for the car
bombs. If the check points lessen the car bombs, we are happy with
them. Instead, we have soldiers and policemen who wave for the cars to
move like traffic policemen who are useless." Meanwhile Sudarsan Raghavan (Washington Post) reports
on a new questionnaire being distributed by Iraqi soldiers which asks a
home's occupant for the a copy of their house deed, the names of their
children and the name of the family's tribe "which identifies his
religion and ethnicity. In Iraq, such a request has often been the
first step toward death." Back to the topic of elections, Iraqi elections, Alsumaria's " What's after approving Iraq elections law?"
offers an overview of the steps for approval as well as the basics on
the legislation: "The law stipulates to use an open list electoral
system where voters can choose specific candidates while the old law
refers to a closed list system where they could only select political
parties. The new law does not cover the three provinces of
Kurdistand. Polls there will be conducted according to a separate law
that the region's parliament needs to write and pass." Tom A. Peter (Christian Science Monitor) observes
that if the provisional elections are scheduled, they "will stir debate
over the lack of central services, such as electricity and water. Many
suspect that incumbents will have a hard time getting voter support
because of an ongoing lack of basic utilities" and quotes Baghdad
Univeristy poli sci professor Abdul Jabbar Ahmad stating, "Democracy
does not only mean having an election or passing a law in the
legislature. A real government provides services." And a government
that doesn't puts the citizens in jeopardy. From yesterday's snapshot: "Meanwhile AP reports 327 case -- confirmed cases -- of cholera in Iraq." Leila Fadel (McClatchy's Baghdad Observer) notes
the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction most recent
report which found "only 20 percent of families outside of Baghdad
province have access to sewage facitlities. Driving through Iraq's
province is all the proof one needs. In many southern provinces the
sewage runs like rivers through the towns while children play nearby
and young kids swim through the dirty river water." Remember what
professor Abdul Jabbar Ahmad stated? "A real government provides
services"? Cholera's outbreak in Iraq is now an annual summer event.
It is completely expected and little is done to prevent it. The UN's
WHO pushes societal obligations off as individual ones as if
individuals are the ones at fault for the lack of electricity nad the
lack of potatable water? There has been no improvement in providing
potable water, electricity continues to falter in Iraq and purchasing
fuel to heat water (and make it safe) is problematic as fuel prices
continue to rise. But the 'answer' is to repeat what they repeat every
year and pretend that the central government in Iraq is not failing and
that Nouri al-Maliki isn't sitting on billions that should have long
ago been used for reconstruction. The UN is working on one water
project in Iraq. Jiro Sakaki (The Daily Yomiuri) reports that the UN's Environment Program's International Enivornmental Technology Center is attempting to save the marshlands. In diplomatic news, Xinhua reports
today a reception took place in China "to mark the 50th anniversary of
the establishment of China-Iraq diplomatic relations." In other
diplomatic news, at the end of this year, the UN mandate that the US
has been operating under in Iraq (a mandate put in place after the
start of the illegal war) expires December 31st. Puppet of the
occupation Nouri al-Maliki has twice extended it (circumventing
Parliament). The White House is attempting to push through treaties
(and, to circumvent the Senate, is calling them SOFAs). Tina Susman (Los Angeles Times) reports
that US Ambassador Ryan Crocker is stating Iran is attempting to
prevent the puppet and the White House from reaching an agreement and
that "Crocker also speculated that Iran may be tightening its ties to
Shiite Muslim militias in Iraq and co-opting them from anti-U.S. cleric
Muqtada Sadr, who for the last year has ordered his followers to
largely refrain from violence. He said Iran has a history of using
members of political or other opposition groups in other countries to
its advantage." Damien McElroy (Telegraph of London) adds,
"Iran has condemned leaked drafts of the bilateral agreement to replace
the mandate. Nouri al-Maliki, Iraq's prime minister, replaced
professional diplomats on the negotiating team with members of his
private office in August, a development that has pro-Iranian
politicians at the heart of the negotiations. Baghdad maintains that
US efforts to secure immunity from prosecution in Iraq for troops and
contractors is an unacceptible demand. David Satterfield, the top US
negotiator, travelled to Baghdad with a counter proposal but Mr Crocker
admitted Mr Maliki was unwilling to concede the principle when popular
opinion in Iraq was overwhelmingly opposed." Yesterday Michel Ghandour (Al-Hurra) interviewed US Secretary of State Condi Rice at the Women Leaders Working Group in NYC: Michel
Ghandour: Madame Secretary, why do you think there's no agreement yet
with the Iraqis regarding the American presence in Iraq, and what role
do you think Iran is playing in this regard? Condi
Rice: Well, I don't know what role Iran is playing, but it's not for
Iran to determine. It's for the Iraqi Government and the
represenatives of the Iraqi people to determine. And it's a
negotiation that's continuing that I think has actually got a good
spirit of cooperation. People do understand that without an agreement
-- American forces can only operate on a legal basis, and so we need a
legal basis. But we're working very well with the Iraqis on this.
They're not easy issues, and so it takes time. But we are working very
well and we're working toward agreement. The
take-away is a question: If the US Ambassador to Iraq is telling the
truth, why didn't Rice also grab the talking point yesterday? (The
question offered it to her.) In a readily established conflict between Iraq and another country, Hurriyet reports that Turkish military planes bombed northern Iraq Thursday night "and hit 16 locations" thought to belong to the PKK. Al Jazeera states 10 military planes were used in the bombing. BBC quotes an unnamded PKK spokesperson saying three people were wounded in the bombings. It's a Friday. Very little violence gets reported on Fridays. Sahar Issa (McClatchy Newspapers) reports
1 Iraqi soldier shot dead in Anbar Province (four more wounded) and 1
police officer shot dead in Anbar province (one more wounded). Reuters notes 2 "Awakening" Council members shot dead outside Samarra and 1 person killed in Mosul. Today the US military announced:
"A Multi-National Division - Center Soldier was killed Sep. 25 when a
roadside bomb struck a vehicle that was part of a combat patrol near
Iskandariyah. The name of the deceased is being withheld pending
notification of next of kin and official release by the Department of
Defense. The incident is under investigation." The announcement brings
the number of US service members killed in Iraq to 4173 since the start of the illegal war with 22 for the month thus far. Turning to TV, check your local listings. NOW on PBS explores the bailout and
attempts to answer for "Americans: How will this affect me? This week,
NOW on PBS goes inside the round-the-clock efforts in Washington to
craft a bailout plan of monumental proportions." Meanwhile, tonight's
debate is on -- for both of the corporatist candidates at any rate.
PBS' Washington Week
is going to do two live broadcasts on Friday. One before the debate
and one after. Gwen's guests will include Michele Norris (NPR),
Michael Duffy ( Time), David Wessel ( Wall St. Journal) Dan Balz ( Washington Post), and a scribe for the New York Times. Four presidential candidates are shut out of tonight's debate. Two are Bob Barr and Chuck Baldwin. The other two? Cynthia McKinney is the Green presidential candidate and she notes on the economic meltdown: Last week, I posted ten points
(that were by no means exhaustive) for Congressional action immediately
in the wake of the financial crisis now gripping our country. At that
time, the Democratic leadership of Congress was prepared to adjourn the
current legislative Session to campaign, without taking any action at
all to put policies in place that protect U.S. taxpayers and the global
community that has accepted U.S. financial leadership. Those ten
points, to be taken in conjunction with the Power to the People Committee's platform available on the campaign website at (http://votetruth08.com/index.php/resources/campaignplatform), are as follows:1. Enactment of a foreclosure moratorium now before the next phase of ARM interest rate increases take effect;2. elimination of all ARM mortgages and their renegotiation into 30- or 40-year loans;3. establishment of new mortgage lending practices to end predatory and discriminatory practices;4. establishment of criteria and construction goals for affordable housing;5. redefinition of credit and regulation of the credit industry so that discriminatory practices are completely eliminated;6. full funding for initiatives that eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in home ownership;7.
recognition of shelter as a right according to the United Nations
Declaration of Human Rights to which the U.S. is a signatory so that no
one sleeps on U.S. streets;8.
full funding of a fund designed to cushion the job loss and provide for
retraining of those at the bottom of the income scale as the economy
transitions;9. close all tax loopholes and repeal of the Bush tax cuts for the top 1% of income earners; and10. fairly tax corporations, denying federal subsidies to those who relocate jobs overseas repeal NAFTA.In addition to these ten points, I now add four more:11.
Appointment of former Comptroller General David Walker to fully audit
all recipients of taxpayer cash infusions, including JP Morgan, Bear
Stearns, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and AIG, and to monitor their trading
activities into the future;12. elimination of all derivatives trading;13.
nationalization of the Federal Reserve and the establishment of a
federally-owned, public banking system that makes credit available for
small businesses, homeowners, manufacturing operations, renewable
energy and infrastructure investments; and14.
criminal prosecution of any activities that violated the law, including
conflicts of interest that led to the current crisis.Ellen Brown, author of "The Web of Debt" writes at http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/, "Such
a public bank today could solve not only the housing crisis but a
number of other pressing problems, including the infrastructure crisis
and the energy crisis. Once bankrupt businesses have been restored to
solvency, the usual practice is to return them to private hands; but a
better plan for Fannie and Freddie might be to simply keep them as
public institutions."Too
many times politicians have told us to support the "free market." The
unfolding news informs us in a most costly manner that free markets
don't work. This is a financial system of their making. It's now past
time for the people to have an economic system of their own. A reading
of the full text on the Congressional "Agreement on Principles" for the
proposed $700 billion bailout reveals the sham that this so-called
agreement truly is. Today our country faces an economic 9/11. The
problem that is unfolding is truly systemic and no stop-gap measures
that maintain the current bankrupt structure will be sufficient to
resolve this crisis of the U.S. economic engine.Today
is my son's birthday. What a gift to the young people of this country
if we were to present to them a clean break from the policies that
produced this economic disaster, the "financial tsunami" that former
Comptroller General David Walker warned us of so many months ago and
instead offered them a U.S. economic superstructure that truly was
their own.Power to the People!McKinney's running mate Rosa Clemente will be speaking at the International People's Democratic Uhuru Movement
(InPDUM) Saturday, September 27th. Ralph Nader is the independent
presidential candidate and he is also shut out of tonight's debate. Nader notes that, more than any cash infusion, the country needs leadership with spine: Congress
needs to show some backbone before the federal government pours more
money on the financial bonfire started by the arsonists on Wall Street. 1.Congress
should hold a series of hearings and invite broad public comment on any
proposed bailout. Congress is supposed to be a co-equal branch of our
federal government. It needs to stop the stampede to give Bush a $700 billion check.
Public hearings should be held to determine what alternatives might
exist to the four-page proposal advanced by Treasury Secretary Henry M.
Paulson. 2.Whatever is ultimately done, the
bailout plan should not be insulated from judicial review. Remember
there is a third co-equal branch of government: the judiciary. The
judiciary does not need to review each buy-and-sell decision by the
Treasury Department, but there should be some boundaries established to
the Treasury Department's discretion. Judicial review is needed to
ensure that unbridled discretion is not abused. 3.Sunlight
is a good disinfectant. The bailout that is ultimately approved must
provide for full and timely disclosure of all bailout details. This
will discourage conflicts of interest and limit the potential of
sweetheart deals. 4.Firms that accept
government bailout monies must agree to disclose their transactions and
be more honest in their accounting. They should agree to end
off-the-books accounting maneuvers, for example. 5.Taxpayers
must be protected by having a stake in any recovery. The bailout plan
should provide opportunities for taxpayers to recoup funds that are
made available to problem financial institutions, or to benefit from
the financial institutions' rising stock price and increased
profitability after being bailed out. 6.The
current so-called "regulators" cannot be trusted. The U.S. Government
Accountability Office (GAO), "the investigative arm of Congress" and
"the congressional watchdog," must regularly review the bailout. We
cannot trust the financial "regulators," who allowed the slide into
financial disaster, to manage the bailout without outside monitoring. 7.It
is time to put the federal cop back on the financial services beat.
Strong financial regulations and independent regulators are necessary
to rebuild trust in our financial institutions and to prevent further
squandering of our tax dollars. The Justice Department and the SEC also need to scrutinize the expanding mess with an eye to uncovering corporate crime and misdeeds. Major news outlets are reporting that the FBI is investigating American International Group, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and Lehman Brothers. 8.Cap
executive compensation and stop giving the Wall Street gamblers golden
parachutes. The CEOs who have created the financial disaster should not
be allowed to leave with millions in hand when so many pensioners and
small shareholders are seeing their investments evaporate. The
taxpayers are bailing out Wall Street so that the financial system
continues to function, not to further enrich the CEOs and executives
who created this mess. 9.Congress should
pass the Financial Consumers' Information and Representation Act, to
permit citizens to form a federally-chartered nonprofit membership
organization to strengthen consumer representation in government
proceedings that concern the financial services industry. As the
savings and loan disasters of the 1980s and the Wall Street debacles of
the last few years have demonstrated, there is an overriding need for
consumers and taxpayers to have the organized means to enhance their
influence on financial issues. 10.The
repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act, separating traditional banks from
investment banks, helped pave the way for the current disaster. It is
time to re-regulate the financial sector. The current crisis is also
leading to even further conglomeration and concentration in the
financial sector. We must revive and apply antitrust principles, so
that banking consumers can benefit from competition and taxpayers are
less vulnerable to too-big-to-fail institutions, which merge with each
other to further concentration. 11.Congress
should impose a securities and derivatives speculation tax. A tax on
financial trading would slow down the churning of stocks and financial
instruments, and could raise substantial monies to pay for the bailout. 12.Regulators
should impose greater margin requirements, making speculators use more
of their own money and diminishing reckless casino capitalism. Ask
your representative a few questions: "What should be done to limit
banking institutions from investing in high-risk activities?" "What
should be done to ensure banks are meeting proper capital standards
given the financial quicksand that has spread as a result of the former
Senator Phil Gramm's deregulation efforts?" And, "What is being done to protect small investors?" P.S.
Shareholders also have some work to do. They should have listened when
Warren Buffett called securities derivatives a "time bomb" and
"financial weapons of mass destruction." The Wall Street crooks and
unscrupulous speculators use and draining of "other people's money" out
of pension funds and mutual funds should motivate painfully passive
shareholders to organize to gain greater authority to control the
companies they own. Where is the shareholder uprising? Like
Hillary's 2008 run for President, Ferraro's 1984 run for the second
spot brought all sorts of sexism out of the closet. It was an
eye-opener for everyone. In the end, this bold, risky choice didn't
seem to affect the outcome. The exit polls showed that having a woman
on the ticket was a prime concern for only a few. These voters about
equally divided between those who told pollsters that they voted for a
woman and those who said they voted against one. Ferraro's
candidacy had a bigger effect on those who answered the annual polling
question (in a different poll): Would you vote for "a well-qualified
woman of your own party for President"? After Ferraro a party gap
appeared. Republicans were 50 percent more likely than Democrats to
answer "No." Republicans have continued to say they would not vote
for a well-qualified (but unnamed) woman for President at a much higher
rate than Democrats. Wonder what they will tell the pollsters this year? Katie
Couric: As we stand before this august building and institution, what
do you see as the role of the United States in the world?
Sarah
Palin: I see the United States as being a force for good in the world.
And as Ronald Reagan used to talk about, America being the beacon of
light and hope for those who are seeking democratic values and
tolerance and freedom. I see our country being able to represent those
things that can be looked to … as that leadership, that light needed
across the world.
Couric: In preparing for this conversation,
a lot of our viewers … and Internet users wanted to know why you did
not get a passport until last year. And they wondered if that indicated
a lack of interest and curiosity in the world.
Palin: I'm not
one of those who maybe came from a background of, you know, kids who
perhaps graduate college and their parents give them a passport and
give them a backpack and say go off and travel the world. No, I've
worked all my life. In fact, I usually had two jobs all my life until I
had kids. I was not a part of, I guess, that culture. The way that I
have understood the world is through education, through books, through
mediums that have provided me a lot of perspective on the world. Part one aired Wednesday evening
and both links have text and video. As Jo Freeman noted, Palin is
following in Ferraro's footsteps (Palin has publicly acknowledged that
and that she follows in Hillary Clinton's footsteps as well). Genevieve Roth (Glamour) spoke with Ferraro to get her tips for Palin and
Ferraro offers many worthwhile reflections and suggestions but probably
sums it up the best with this: "The bottom line is, Sarah Palin doesn't
need advice from me or anyone. She wouldn't be in the position she's in
if she wasn't able to deal with the campaign." |
Posted at 04:14 pm by thecommonills
Permalink
The US military announces another death
Today the US military announced:
"A Multi-National Division - Center Soldier was killed Sep. 25 when a
roadside bomb struck a vehicle that was part of a combat patrol near
Iskandariyah. The name of the deceased is being withheld pending
notification of next of kin and official release by the Department of
Defense. The incident is under investigation." The announcement brings
the number of US service members killed in Iraq to 4173 since the start of the illegal war with 22 for the month thus far. Meanwhile Derek Kravitz offered " Army Probes Possible Toxic Exposure in Iraq" ( Washington Post) Wednesday afternoon: Senior
Army officials are investigating claims that National Guardsmen were
exposed to a toxin in 2003 while protecting a water pumping plant in
Iraq.Two employees with the
firm Kellogg, Brown and Root told Senate Democrats in June that members
of the 1st Battalion, 152nd Infantry division of the Indiana National
Guard were exposed to sodium dichromate, despite promises from company officials that the Qarmat Ali facility in Basra, Iraq, was safe.One employee reported seeing the plant covered in a "layer of bright orange dust" that was carried by the wind, Gannett News Service reports.Staying with safety issues, alarms are being raised re: the security of Baghdad. An Iraqi correspondent for McClatchy contributes " Traffic Jam Again" ( Inside Iraq): People
keep asking of the real benefits of having so many check points all
over Baghdad with the violence starts again to show up these days after
a period of freezing which didn't last long. Is this a kind of pressure
message to the government? Or is something bigger than that? Is it
related to the military operations in Diyala and Mosul? The Iraqi
people and especially Baghdad is fed up with promises by officials and
security commanders of the improving of the security situation.
Millions of students in schools and universities started their new
studying year this week which will add more traffic in Baghdad and more
targets for the car bombs. If the check points lessen the car bombs,
we are happy with them. Instead, we have soldiers and policemen who
wave for the cars to move like traffic policemen who are useless.The concern has been expressed directly to the US military. We'll drop back to Tuesday's snapshot to note a Monday press briefing: Staying
with the Defense Dept, Lt Gen Lloyd Austin III briefed reporters
yesterday from Iraq and used "positive" and "progress" repeatedly. For
what doesn't matter, check out the write up by Adam Levine (CNN).
The press briefing was so much more interesting. Austin did a hard sell
on the "Awakening" Council members declaring, "One of our primary focus
areas as we move foward is transitioning the Sons of Iraq program to
the Iraqi government. The volunteer movement that started in Anbar and
spread across the rest of the country significantly contributed to the
security successes that we are now taking advantage of. The Sons of
Iraq have paid a heavy price fight al Qaeda and other insurgent groups,
and it's important that the government of Iraq responsibly transition
them into meaningful employment. Prime Minister Maliki has assured me
that the government will help those who help the people of Iraq. And so
next week in Baghdad the government will accept responsibility for
approximately 54,000 Sons of Iraq, and we will be there to assist in
the transfer. We spent the last few weeks working hand in hand with our
Iraqi partners on this transition, and I'm confident that this will go
well. And you should know that we will not abandon the Sons of Iraq."
In response to a question from Bill McMichael of Military Times,
Austin stated that there were 99,000 "Awakening" Council members and
54,000 are in Baghdad "so we will start with the Baghdad province next
month and transition that element first, and then we will begin to move
to other parts of the country and transition those elements." The most
interesting exchange took place when JJ Sutherland (NPR) attempted to
pin down Austin on what happens when the 54,000 transfer over in terms
of what they do now and what they will do? Sutherland had to repeatedly
bring up the issue of "Awakening" Council members currently staffing
checkpoints in Baghdad and ask what happens to those checkpoints?
Austin's repeated replies indicated he hadn't understood the question
because no one in the US military had thought about that. Best exchange. JJ
Sutherland: Sir, I understand that but I'[m saying, "What happens in
October? I understand eventually you want to have them be plumbers or
electricians. But in October, there are a lot of checkpoints that have
been manned by the Sons of Iraq. Are those checkpoints all going to go
away? Are they only going to be staffed by Iraqi police now? That's my
question. It's not eventually, it's next month.
Lt
Gen Lloyd Austin: Yeah. Next month the Iraqi government will begin to
work their way through this. And there's no question that some of them,
some of the checkpoints, many of the checkpoints, will be -- will be
manned by Iraqi security forces. In some cases, there may be Sons of
Iraq that will be taksed to help with that work. But in most cases, I
think the Iraqi government will be looking to transition people into
different types of jobs.
At which point the Pentagon's spokesperson (DOD press office director) Gary Keck jumped in with the cry of one more question.While
the military ignores what the shift re: checkpoints in Baghdad might
mean for the capitol, tensions continue on Iraq's border with Turkey. Hurriyet offers " Turkish warplanes hit 16 PKK positions in northern Iraq, army says"
which explains Turkish military planes bombed northern Iraq Thursday
night "and hit 16 locations" thought to belong to the PKK: The military has not revealed any casualty figures. It said all warplanes returned safely to bases in Turkey.Previous
media reports suggest Thursday's air strikes began after 1900 GMT in
two separate regions in northern Iraq. "Last night two separate regions
were bombed where the PKK was believed to be taking shelter," a
high-ranking Turkish security official told Reuters.The
mayor of the town of Jarawa in Iraq, Azad Wassu, said there were
Turkish air strikes on the Qandil Mountains from 10 p.m. on Thursday
until 12:30 a.m. The PKK confirmed the attack and said one of its
members was wounded, Reuters added.TV notes, PBS and check local listings. In many markets, the programs begin airing tonight. NOW on PBS explores the bailout: The
government's historic proposal to bail out the U.S. banking system is
raising as many questions as it is offering solutions. Some in Congress
are warning against reacting too quickly; others want conditions that
protect homeowners, increase oversight, and limit the compensation of
corporate executives.But
the number one question on the minds of Americans: How will this affect
me? This week, NOW on PBS goes inside the round-the-clock efforts in
Washington to craft a bailout plan of monumental proportions.NOW's
cameras follow Damon Silvers, an associate general counsel at the
AFL-CIO, the nation's largest federation of labor unions, as he works
to get help for working Americans in addition to bailing out financial
firms in distress. Silvers, an architect of the major provisions
Congressional Democrats are pushing for in the bill, provides key
insight on the stake ordinary working Americans have in the fate of
this proposal, and on what comes next.Washington Week plans for . . . anything because tonight's scheduled debate remains iffy: The
nation’s financial crisis ramped up partisan and presidential politics
this week putting both a rescue plan for Wall Street and the first
presidential debate up in the air.Late
today [Thursday], Barack Obama and John McCain met with President Bush
and Congressional Leaders at the White House to discuss the nation’s
economic crisis and possible solutions but reports are that the meeting
went very badly. At this hour, it’s still unclear how this will play
out and whether or not there will be a presidential debate on Friday.WASHINGTON
WEEK is tracking developments and is planning two LIVE broadcasts
Friday night. Gwen Ifill and our panel will have the most up-to-date
details on the economic bailout plan as well as a preview of the
presidential debate LIVE on WASHINGTON WEEK at 8pm (ET) on most PBS
stations in the Eastern and Central time zones.WASHINGTON
WEEK is tracking developments and is planning two LIVE broadcasts
Friday night -- one before and the other after PBS coverage of the
debate moderated by Jim Lehrer of the NewsHour. Gwen Ifill and our
panel will have the most up-to-date details on the economic bailout
plan as well as a preview of the presidential debate LIVE on WASHINGTON
WEEK at 8pm (ET) on most PBS stations in the Eastern and Central time
zones.Joining Gwen around the WASHINGTON WEEK table:Michele Norris of NPRMichael Duffy of TIME MagazineDavid Wessel of The Wall Street JournalDan Balz of The Washington PostJohn Harwood of CNBC and The New York TimesYou won’t want to miss a minute of WASHINGTON WEEK on this historic week of news.NOW on PBS will have video streaming of the latest program beginning Saturday. Washington Week will offer video and audio streaming (with a transcript to follow on Monday). On the meltdown, Micah notes this from Team Nader: Nader Responds to McCain/Obama/Bush White House Meeting Press ReleaseFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEContact: Toby Heaps, 202-441-6795Nader Statement on Bailout, Mcain/Obama Meeting With BushBailout is Big Mistake. Crackdown on Corporate Crime. Protect Homeowners.Ralph Nader and Matt Gonzalez vigorously oppose Bush's $700 billion taxpayer bailout of Wall Street."This
is not just a bailout of Wall Street" says Nader, "It's a bailing out
of the bankrupt Republican and Democratic policies that have led us to
where we are today with Senators John "Deregulation" McCain and Joe
"MBNA" Biden leading the way.Full Statement from Ralph Nader:Today
at 4 p.m., Senators John McCain and Barack Obama will meet with other
Congressional leaders and President Bush to join the stampede to bail
out Wall Street with Main Street and Elm Street's money.Unfortunately, their rhetorical flourishes to crackdown on Wall Street and protect Main Street will not be met with substance.The
bailout ignores the needs of millions of swindled families facing
foreclosure, and it squanders an opportunity to bring about real
regulatory change, shareholder power and taxpayer equity that would
prevent economic crises like this from happening again. Wall Street's
wildly overpaid bosses are addicted to speculative gambling with other
people's money. When a drug addict is facing overdose, you don't give
them more needles.We
need to protect homeowners and our neighborhoods first. That's why
Nader/Gonzalez support introducing a law with a 5-year sunset clause
that would provide homeowners facing foreclosure the right to rent to
own their homes at fair market value.Wall
Street is out of control. We need to bring some sense of
accountability, transparency, and law and order back to Wall Street's
crooks and speculators, or they will desperately seek socialism to bail
out their criminal corporate capitalism, going to the taxpayer trough
in Washington DC each time. That's why Nader/Gonzalez support a Wall
Street speculation tax, starting on derivatives, which would make Wall
Street less like Las Vegas, and generate enough funds to eliminate the
tax burden on the first $50,000 of income for every working American.-End- ShareThisShareThis Meanwhile,
Amy Goodman continues her long history of lying today which is only a
surprise if you haven't been paying attention. Today she cozies up to
homophobia (yet again -- see Marcia's " Amy Goodman and other homophobes"
from last night). Goody cozies up to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iranian
president, and refuses to challenge him. Now Bill Clinton (her most
famous interview) in 2000, she can challenge. But the Red Diaper Baby
is happy to let Ahmadinejad not only LIE but to smear the dead? Of
course, because Goodman is a homophobe. For the reality Goody won't
pursue, you can read Robert Verkaik's " A life or death decision" ( Independent of London, March 6, 2008): A
gay teenager who sought sanctuary in Britain when his boyfriend was
executed by the Iranian authorities now faces the same fate after
losing his legal battle for asylum. Mehdi
Kazemi, 19, came to London to study English in 2004 but later
discovered that his boyfriend had been arrested by the Iranian police,
charged with sodomy and hanged. In
a telephone conversation with his father in Tehran, Mr Kazemi was told
that before the execution in April 2006, his boyfriend had been
questioned about sexual relations he had with other men and under
interrogation had named Mr Kazemi as his partner. Fearing
for his own life if he returned to Iran, Mr Kazemi claimed asylum in
Britain. But late in 2007 his case was refused. Terror-stricken at the
prospect of deportation the young Iranian made a desperate attempt to
evade deportation and fled Britain for Holland where he is now being
detained amid a growing outcry from campaigners.
Back to the US presidential race, Cynthia McKinney is the Green presidential candidate:
A Gift for a Generation: A U.S. Financial System of Our Own Thursday, 25 September 2008 20:20 A Gift for a Generation: A U.S. Financial System of Our Own
by Cynthia McKinney September 25, 2008
Last
week, I posted ten points (that were by no means exhaustive) for
Congressional action immediately in the wake of the financial crisis
now gripping our country. At that time, the Democratic leadership of
Congress was prepared to adjourn the current legislative Session to
campaign, without taking any action at all to put policies in place
that protect U.S. taxpayers and the global community that has accepted
U.S. financial leadership. Those ten points, to be taken in conjunction
with the Power to the People Committee's platform available on the campaign website at (http://votetruth08.com/index.php/resources/campaignplatform), are as follows:
1. Enactment of a foreclosure moratorium now before the next phase of ARM interest rate increases take effect; 2. elimination of all ARM mortgages and their renegotiation into 30- or 40-year loans; 3. establishment of new mortgage lending practices to end predatory and discriminatory practices; 4. establishment of criteria and construction goals for affordable housing; 5. redefinition of credit and regulation of the credit industry so that discriminatory practices are completely eliminated; 6. full funding for initiatives that eliminate racial and ethnic disparities in home ownership; 7.
recognition of shelter as a right according to the United Nations
Declaration of Human Rights to which the U.S. is a signatory so that no
one sleeps on U.S. streets; 8.
full funding of a fund designed to cushion the job loss and provide for
retraining of those at the bottom of the income scale as the economy
transitions; 9. close all tax loopholes and repeal of the Bush tax cuts for the top 1% of income earners; and 10. fairly tax corporations, denying federal subsidies to those who relocate jobs overseas repeal NAFTA.
In addition to these ten points, I now add four more:
11.
Appointment of former Comptroller General David Walker to fully audit
all recipients of taxpayer cash infusions, including JP Morgan, Bear
Stearns, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and AIG, and to monitor their trading
activities into the future; 12. elimination of all derivatives trading; 13.
nationalization of the Federal Reserve and the establishment of a
federally-owned, public banking system that makes credit available for
small businesses, homeowners, manufacturing operations, renewable
energy and infrastructure investments; and 14.
criminal prosecution of any activities that violated the law, including
conflicts of interest that led to the current crisis.
Ellen Brown, author of "The Web of Debt" writes at http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/, "Such
a public bank today could solve not only the housing crisis but a
number of other pressing problems, including the infrastructure crisis
and the energy crisis. Once bankrupt businesses have been restored to
solvency, the usual practice is to return them to private hands; but a
better plan for Fannie and Freddie might be to simply keep them as
public institutions."
Too
many times politicians have told us to support the "free market." The
unfolding news informs us in a most costly manner that free markets
don't work. This is a financial system of their making. It's now past
time for the people to have an economic system of their own. A reading
of the full text on the Congressional "Agreement on Principles" for the
proposed $700 billion bailout reveals the sham that this so-called
agreement truly is. Today our country faces an economic 9/11. The
problem that is unfolding is truly systemic and no stop-gap measures
that maintain the current bankrupt structure will be sufficient to
resolve this crisis of the U.S. economic engine.
Today
is my son's birthday. What a gift to the young people of this country
if we were to present to them a clean break from the policies that
produced this economic disaster, the "financial tsunami" that former
Comptroller General David Walker warned us of so many months ago and
instead offered them a U.S. economic superstructure that truly was
their own.
Power to the People!
Click here to read Cynthia's previous column (link goes to Black Agenda Report). McKinney's running mate Rosa Clemente will be speaking at the International People's Democratic Uhuru Movement (InPDUM) Saturday, September 27th. Ralph Nader is the independent presidential candidate and Tori notes this from Team Nader:
Nader Demands to be Included in Debates Press ReleaseFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEContact: (Washington) Toby Heaps, 202-471-5833, toby@votenader.orgNADER TO OBAMA/MCCAIN: LET ME IN!For the economy's sake, there is no choice but to end war and make peace.On
the eve of the first Presidential debate on foreign policy and in the
midst of the biggest economic meltdown since 1929, Ralph Nader presents
a simple solution for fixing the biggest hole in the taxpayer's pocket
and challenges McCain/Obama to debate him on it."My
campaign is on the ballot in 45 states and is polling at around 5
percent nationally, higher in several key swing states. I have earned a
podium in the debates, and, unlike McCain and Obama, my foreign policy
brings our soldiers back from Iraq and Afghanistan. This will save us a
few hundred billion dollars in direct and deferred costs each year."Mr.
Nader elaborated: "The fact that a candidate can call for changing the
date of the debate only two days before it is scheduled indicates how
easy it would be for the candidates to also call for the inclusion of
the leading third party and independent candidates, which would bring
fresh ideas to the table on how our country can most effectively tackle
this heavy economic challenge, starting with curbing our imperialist
foreign policy." Please see Ralph Nader's case to open up the debates in today's edition of USA TodayNader and Obama Girl join forces to open up debates(check Youtube for this video after 2pm)See blog in favor of giving voice to the third of voters not with two parties-END- ShareThisShareThis The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.
iraq
mcclatchy newspapers
the washington post
derek kravitz
now on pbs
pbs
washington week
michele norris
dan balz
david wessel
sickofitradlz
robert verkaik
Posted at 04:13 pm by thecommonills
Permalink
|
 |
|
|
|
|