The Common Ills


Tuesday, May 10, 2005
Conference Presenters for the Free Press' Media Reform conference this weekend in St. Louis, MO

Conference Presenters for the Free Press' Media Reform conference this weekend in St. Louis, MO

The Free Press' National Conference for Media Reform currently has the following conference presenters listed:

Conference Presenters
Conference presenters will represent diverse perspectives on media policy issues and media reform activism. Speakers will include activists, academics, artists, policymakers, journalists, and leaders from various local, regional, and national groups. This list will be updated regularly. Confirmed presenters include:

Rana Abbas, American-Arab Anti Discrimination Committee
Commissioner Jonathan Adelstein, Federal Communications Commission
Amalia Anderson, League of Rural Voters
John Arnold, Wayne State University
Medea Benjamin, Global Exchange
Frank Blethen, Seattle Times
Karen Bond, media activist
Wally Bowen, Mountain Area Information Network
João Brant, Intervozes, Brazil
David Brock, Media Matters for America
Sue Buske, The Buske Group
Michael Calabrese, New America Foundation
Ann Chaitovitz, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists
Rev. Robert Chase, United Church of Christ
Jeff Chester, Center for Digital Democracy
Inja Coates, Media Tank
Jeff Cohen, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting
Lauren Coletta, Public Interest Public Airwaves Coaliton / Common Cause
Mark Cooper, Consumer Federation of America
Commissioner Michael Copps, Federal Communications Commission
Malkia Cyril, Youth Media Council
Lauren Glen Davitian, CCTV Center for Media & Democracy
Liza Dichter, Center for International Media Action
John Dunbar, The Center for Public Integrity
Harold Feld, Media Access Project
Saskia Fischer, Media Empowerment Project; United Church of Christ
Laura Flanders, Air America Radio [author, journalist]*
Bill Fletcher Jr., Trans Africa Forum
Linda Foley, The Newspaper Guild / CWA
Glen Ford, Black Commentator
Al Franken, Air America Radio, author
Des Freedman, Goldsmiths College, University of London
Eric Galatas, Free Speech TV
Susan Gleason, YES! Magazine; Reclaim the Media
Juan Gonzalez, New York Daily News [Democracy Now!]*
Amy Goodman, Democracy Now!

Peter Grant, Communications and Entertainment Law Group, McCarthy Tétrault
Robert Greenwald, Director; Outfoxed
Robert Hackett, Simon Fraser University
Marjorie Heins, Brennan Center for Justice - Free Expression Policy Project
Jim Hightower, Author; Commentator
Leonard Hill, Leonard Hill Films
Representative Maurice Hinchey, US Congress
James Horwood, partner, Spiegel & McDiarmid
Janine Jackson, Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting
Morgan Jindrich, Consumers Union
Linda Jue, Independent Press Association
Myoungjoon Kim, MediaACT (South Korea)
Gene Kimmelman, Consumers Union
Naomi Klein, Author, Activist
George Lakoff, UC Berkeley, author
Peggy Law, National Radio Project; MediaWorks
Jonathan Lawson, Reclaim the Media
Sydney Levy, Media Alliance
Mark Lloyd, Center for American Progress
Stephen Macek, North Central College; Chicago Media Action
Jerry Mander, International Forum on Globalization
Bob McCannon, New Mexico Media Literacy Project
Robert McChesney, Founder, Free Press
Carrie McLaren, Stay Free! Magazine
R. Sean McLaughlin, Alliance for Community Media
Kembrew McLeod, University of Iowa
Sascha Meinrath, Champaign-Urbana Community Wireless Network
Ed Mierzwinski, U.S. Public Interest Research Group
Susanna Montezemolo, Consumers Union
Alyce Myatt, multimedia consultant
Garry Neill, International Network for Cultural Diversity
John Nichols, The Nation
Emmanuel Njenga Njuguna, Association for Progressive Communications, South Africa
David Olson, Cable Communications Director; City of Portland
Jeff Perlstein, Media Alliance
Carol Pierson, National Federation of Community Broadcasters
Chellie Pingree, Common Cause
Jonathan Rintels, Center for Creative Voices in Media
Tammy Ko Robinson, Video Machete
Luis Enrique Romero, APAGA
Randy Ross, Native Networking Policy Center
Nan Rubin, Community Media Services
Lisa Rudman, National Radio Project
Representative Bernie Sanders, US Congress
Representative Jan Schakowsky, US Congress
Graciela Baroni Selaimen, RITS, Brazil
Andrew Schwartzman, Media Access Project
Josh Seidenfeld, The SPIN Project
Rinku Sen, Color Lines magazine
Roanne Robinson-Shaddox, Native Networking Policy Center
Josh Silver, Executive Director, Free Press
Kavita Singh, Community Technology Centers' Network
Jeff Smith, Grand Rapids Institute for Information Democracy
Norman Solomon, Institute for Public Accuracy [author]*
Nestor Soto, UPAGRA
Thenmozhi Soundararajan, Third World Majority
Jerry Starr, Citizens for Independent Public Broadcasting
Federico Subervi, The Latinos and Media Project
Makani Themba-Nixon, The Praxis Project
Karen Toering, Reclaim the Media
Jenny Toomey, Future of Music Coalition
Pete Tridish, Prometheus Radio Project
Gloria Tristani, United Church of Christ
Tim Walker, Adbusters Media Foundation
Antwuan Wallace, Funding Exchange
Representative Diane Watson, US Congress
Adam Werbach, Common Assets
Celia Wexler, Common Cause
Granville Williams, Campaign for Press and Broadcasting Freedom (United Kingdom)
Rob Williams, MEME films; acme coalition
Dr. Ernest J. Wilson, Corporation for Public Broadcasting
Karen Young, Media Democracy

Chicago organizations are listed for identification purposes only.The conference program, including presenters, are subject to change.

Question/comment? E-mail conference AT freepress.net

For more information, visit the Free Press' web site for this conference. Also note that "*" indicates I've added something. Juan Gonzalez, as most members know, is also a part of Democracy Now! so I credited that. Laura Flanders is an author (and if Al Franken's going to be credited as an author and Flanders' isn't, I can imagine the e-mails that would come in on that). She's also a journalist so that was needed as well. Norman Solomon is also an author and I noted that. My apologies to members who think of others who should have additional credits. And certainly, some people, such as Medea Benjamin, could have a paragraph next to their names. Normally, I just copy and paste something like this but knowing how members feel about Laura Flanders I've added "author, journalist" (both of which she's more than earned) because with Franken (whom many members are not fond of to put it mildly) credited as an "author" but Flanders not being credited as such, I can imagine the e-mails that would pour in.

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.

[Note: This entry originally appeared at The Common Ills.]

Posted at 10:31 pm by thecommonills
 

Danny Schechter on the St. Louis Media Reform conference

Danny Schechter on the St. Louis Media Reform conference

Danny Schechter will be attending the Free Press Media Reform conference this weekend in St. Louis, MO. (Showing WMD, a great film, and WMD" and on the "Creating a Media Democracy Act" panel Saturday afternoon.)

Below is an excerpt of an article he's written on the conference that Martha e-mailed yesterday.
(My apologies to Martha for the delay in this going up.) It's entitled "The Media Reformers Are Coming to Town:"

Mass media had then yet to totally dominate our culture although we have had experiences with the yellow journalism of William Randolph Hearst and, yes, the man that endowed journalism's primo prize, Joseph Pulitzer. Pulitzer founded his national newspaper company in St Louis in 1878.

No one then could have imagined how thoroughly Big Media would affect and infect our political life.

Media has now become a key issue in this new century.

The river town always had a rich media culture, The state's favorite son and one of this country's great writers, Mark Twain, wrote for the St. LouisPost-Dispatch. In 1881, he published a letter he wrote President Garfield to support anti-slavery crusader Frederick Douglass for a public office. He later led the anti-imperialism league against that Vietnam-before-Vietnam, the U.S. war on the Philippines.
It is a town with its own feisty Journalism Review which reports this month: "A new set of rules at the St. Louis Post-Dispatch on alcohol and drug use on the job is aimed at curbing a longtime hazard for both employees and the company. But some employees say the rules, which call for searches and forced drug testing, is a violation of their civil rights."

I am sure the media activists responding to Free Press's call for a second national Media Reform Conference will leave their drugs at home because the assemblage of so many activists and "big names" in media criticism in one place will produce its own high.

Your news dissector will be on hand reporting for MediaChannel.org, showing "WMD" and participatingon a panel ("Creating a Media Democracy Act," Saturdayat 2PM).

In the weeks ahead, MediaChannel will feature diverse comments on the media battle.

For those keeping track, that's Amy Goodman, Laura Flanders, Robert McChesney, Victor S. Navasky and Danny Schechter (among others) that will be attending the conference.

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.

[Note: This entry originally appeared at The Common Ills.]

Posted at 09:28 pm by thecommonills
 

Victor Navasky in St. Louis, MO this weekend for the Media Reform conference

Victor Navasky in St. Louis, MO this weekend for the Media Reform conference

I almost entitled this entry "If You're Going to St. Louis, Take a Camera!" Is anyone not going to be in St. Louis, MO, this weekend? Amy Goodman, Laura Flanders and now Victor Navasky?
From a group e-mail sent to people who sign up for alerts from The Nation:

Nation publisher Victor Navasky will be in St. Louis this weekend along with with many other authors, activists and politicians, as part of the National Conference for Media Reform.
As part of the weekend's events, he'll be signing copies of his new book "A Matter of Opinion," just released by Farrar, Straus and Giroux, on Saturday.

The signing is free and open to the public. You do not need to be registered for the conference in order to attend.

Saturday, May 14, 2005
1:00 to 2:00pm
Millennium Hotel St. Louis
200 South 4th Street
St. Louis, MO

The signing will take place at the Left Bank Books booth outside of the Grand Ballroom on the lower level of the hotel.
And if you're going to be in St. Louis for the media conference, please take time to visit Left Bank Books, one of the premiere independent bookstores in America today.
Click below for info and directions.
http://www.left-bank.com/

You can get a small taste of Navasky's book by reading a recent Nation magazine excerpt, in which he discussed the critical role of journals of dissent.
http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20050516&s=navasky

And check out the book's website for more info and to order copies online.
http://www.amatterofopinionbyvictornavasky.com/

Finally, as you've probably noticed, we've re-done our website with a redesign of our homepage and the addition of new features like a news-wire updated twice each day, a Sites We Like section, RSS feeds, the pod-casting of RadioNation and the ability to log on and post comments to any of our blogs.
Take the opportunity to take part--or start--a debate with Nation writers and readers.
All at
http://www.thenation.com


Please note, Navasky's book excerpt (link above) that ran in The Nation is worth reading. Many of you who know of him as a book author will know him from Naming Names. A book on the McCarthyism period and worth reading if you haven't read it before. It was a National Book Award Nominee, I believe. Hold on. Wrong on my part. It was the winner of The American Book Award in 1982. More impressive. Also on the front cover of the edition I have (1980 trade paperback) of Naming Names, this quote from Studs Terkel:

An astonishing work concerning personal honor and dishonor, shame and shamelessness. A book of stunning insights and suspense.

I've read that book several times over the years and I'm pointing it out because many people I know have so I'm assuming some members have as well. Those who've read it and are (or will be) in the St. Louis, MO area have even more reason to attend.

And on Naming Names, there's a new a edition with a new afterword by the author. (That link takes you to Powell's Books where you can read a review.)

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.

[Note: This entry originally appeared at The Common Ills.]

Posted at 09:10 pm by thecommonills
 

Laura Flanders in St. Louis 5/12 & 5/13

Laura Flanders in St. Louis 5/12 & 5/13

Meet me in St. Louis?
St Louis, MO

Thursday, 5/12, 7 pm
Reading.
Left Bank Books.

399 North Euclid.
(314) 367-6731

Friday,
5/13,
2 pm
The National Conference for Media Reform,
"Creating the Solution."
www.freepress.net/conference.

We linked to a Free Press conference announcement at the first of this month (or the end of April). Flanders will be at this event on Friday (as will Amy Goodman, Robert McChesney and others). Utilize the link above for more information. (And we'll be linking shortly to a piece by Danny Schechter on the Free Press Conference.)

(The two MO events are the only upcoming events currently displayed for Laura Flanders at her official web site.)

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.

[Note: This entry originally appeared at The Common Ills.]
 

Posted at 09:09 pm by thecommonills
 

Amy Goodman's Un-Embed the Media Tour continues in Urbana, IL tomorrow (and other dates this month)

Amy Goodman's Un-Embed the Media Tour continues in Urbana, IL tomorrow (and other dates this month)

Amy Goodman's Un-Embed The Media Tour:

Urbana, IL:
Wednesday, May 11, 3:30 PM
Can Freedom of the Press Survive Media Consolidation?

A Conference for Artists, Journalists, Media Executives, Policy Makers, Activists, and Scholars
Sponsored by the Illinois Initiative for Media Policy Research
Tuesday, May, 107:30 pm

Opening Plenary
Wednesday, May 113:30 pmPanel Discussion
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Free and open to the public.
For more information, visit
http://iimpr.org/

St. Louis, MO:
Friday, May 13, 11:30 AM
The National Conference for Media Reform

Open Plenary: "A Call to Action"
Millennium Hotel
200 South 4th Street
St. Louis, MO 63102
For the conference:

Regular registration fee: $185
Reduced fee for students, seniors, and lower-income activists: $85
Reduced rates are available an honor system
for individuals who cannot afford the regular fee
Single-day rates are NOT available for this event.
For more information about the conference, visit
http://www.freepress.net/conference/

St. Louis, MO:
Friday, May 13, 8 PM
First Unitarian Church

5007 Waterman Blvd.
Free and open to the public.
For more information, call Left Bank Books, 314-367-6731, or visit their website at
www.left-bank.com

Winnipeg, MB:
Sunday, May 15, 12:15 PM
The Canadian Association of Journalists Annual Conference

Fort Garry Hotel
222 Broadway Avenue
Winnipeg, MB R3C OR3
For more information about the conference, visit
http://caj.ca/index.html

San Francisco, CA:
Friday, May 20, 7:30 PM
U.S. premiere of the documentary, Helen's War: Portrait of a Dissident, with Dr. Helen Caldicott of the Nuclear Policy Research Institute and Julia Butterfly Hill
Castro Theatre

429 Castro Street at Market
San Francisco
$25 for the event ($15 student/seniors) and $100 for the event and reception following the film with Dr. Caldicott, Amy Goodman and Julia Butterfly Hill.
To purchase advance tickets online or print out a mail-in order form, visit
www.nuclearpolicy.org/EventArticle.cfm?EventID=91

Philadelphia, PA:
Saturday, May 21, 4:15 PM
Sustainable Business Network of Philadelphia

Keynote speech, The Importance of Independent Media
Law School of the University of Pennylvania

3401 Sansom St.

Ashland, WI:
Saturday, May 28
Northland College Commencement

More details to be posted soon.

Los Angeles, CA:
Sunday, May 29, 8:00 PM
11th Annual Pedagogy & Theatre of the Oppressed Conference

Co-hosted by the Center for Theatre of the Oppressed; and Applied Theatre Arts, Los Angeles; and CAFE of the Paulo Freire Instute, UCLA
Renaissance Hollywood Hotel
1755 North Highland
Hollywood, California
Tickets for this event:
The Saturday through Tuesday Conference tickets are available online at PTO Website
Tickets for the Saturday, 8:00 PM event: $10 donation, available at the door
For more information, call (213) 740-6673

To check for dates added or details added (for instance, May 28th's Ashland, WI will have details added later) click on the "Un-Embed the Media" permalink to the left. The tour was in Urbana today and continues tomorrow (Wednesday). In addition we'll be linking to something by Danny Schechter later tonight for the St. Louis, MO events beginning this Friday, May 13th.

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.

[Note: This entry originally appeared at The Common Ills.]

Posted at 08:22 pm by thecommonills
 

Questions from the members who visit the mirror site

I just got off the phone with Rebecca who had written a post, was attempting to publish it (at her site, Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude) only to get a message that Blogger was down.  She's upset and I don't blame her.  At another time, I would be sharing her anger and anxiety (for several hours because when Blogger says it will be down for one hour, it's more likely two hours).

But thanks to the UK Computer Gurus, we have this site.  When the original site doesn't work, we just slide on over to the mirror site here.  At this site, you get a visually attractive site.  (UK Computer Gurus picked the template and everything else here.  I did the work, the bad work, at The Common Ills original site.)

And this allows our members who prefer the look of this site (mainly, but not only European members) to get a post first from time to time.

We'll make this site to you and about you.

A number of you have e-mailed to ask why there is often such a huge delay in transfering a post over here.  Sometimes this program works too slowly.  During the work week, if it's moving slow, this program, there sometimes isn't time to post multiple entries here.  (If it's a morning with mulitple entries.)  You went a day without any posts when I was especially under the weather and (quite honestly) had forgotten the log in for this site.

With this site and the other one, hopefully, in a pinch, members have a way to access at any time.

When Blogger went crazy, I wasn't able to blog on a Thursday evening/night.    Blogger has a great deal of problems from time to time.  (These are supposed to be in the past.)  (Right now, it's down for "schedule maintenance.")  I could live without posting that evening but I was worried what would happen the next morning if Blogger was still down. 

It was.  And UK Computer Gurus were on hand to attempt to help me but when that proved impossible, they informed that they'd taken the lead to creat a mirror site.  Thanks to them, in one form or another, The Common Ills has never missed a day.

I'm sure at some point we will miss a day.  But for now . . .

The other big question is where is the "blog roll?"

Since this is mirror site, we're using the free version.  To create a blog roll would require payment.
An equal number of you have written in to say that you were glad there was no blog roll. 

The other big question is will others create mirror sites?  Rebecca is a community member (Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude).  Thus far she's shown no interest in a mirror site and feels that she'll take the frustration.  (That's from her.  I asked her while we were on the phone what I should say.)  Betty is a community member (Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man) as well and she has said she doesn't have the time to run a mirror site.  Ava, Jess, Ty, Dona and Jim are community members who run The Third Estate Sunday Review.  They aren't planning to do a mirror site at this time.

With the exception of their first attempt at posting, they've been fortunate to never have a Blogger problem.  They asked a friend to design their site's template and it was pretty amazing.  But after they did their first entry and attempted to post it, the whole thing crashed.

I think there site has a nice look to it (and disclosure, I picked the template when they were still upset about the crash) but it is nothing like the way it would have looked if the template that had been designed hadn't crashed.

Community member Folding Star has created a mirror site for A Winding Road: original site, mirror site.  I really think Folding Star's mirror site has a great look to it.

When there are visitors, usually to The Common Ills main site, I will occassionally get an e-mail asking (or exclaiming) "How dare ____ write" whatever.  "How dare they!"

They can write whatever they want.  We need more voices not less. 

But the e-mails that always surprise me are the ones that ask how I could have written ____ when, in fact, I didn't write it.  Maybe Betty wrote it, or Rebecca or Folding Star or The Third Estate Sunday Review without any input or assist from me.

By all means, let me know if you disagree with something I've said.  But I'm responsible for me.  I'm not responsible for what others write.  There was a time, not that long ago, where someone who should have known better wanted to hold me accountable for what Rebecca wrote.  I like Rebecca, I support her right to write whatever she wants and I enjoy her voice.  But I'm not Rebecca.  And anyone who reads her blog Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude, Rebecca will frequently note a disagreement of opinion between us.  We can, and sometimes do, disagree.  We're different people, not clones.

I don't write the way she writes, she doesn't write the way I do.  For either of us to attempt to ape the other would result in our killing on our voice as we attempted to practice imitation.  So, and here's the point, the easiest way to ensure no reply (other than the automated one) is to attempt to draw a line between Rebecca and myself or any member and myself.

I think everyone is doing great work.

The second easiest way to guarantee no e-mail response is to tell me that I said something that I didn't.  I've spent too many hours looking for, for instance, my universal praise of every word that David Corn has ever written.  I never found it because it's never been posted.  I don't have time for that nonsense.  (And it truly angers me to be told I wrote something I never did.)

By all means, pick apart what I wrote, but after the David Corn (and other topics), I stopped replying to those sort of e-mails. 

There are certain things that I would never say and when I'm told that I said something I didn't, my first instinct is to think I must have badly written an entry that confused the person e-mailing.
A person, it should be noted, who will never include a link to the supposed post.  So I'd waste multiple hours attempting to find the non-existant post.

I don't have time for that these days.  So those e-mails get read but no response.

I'm thinking that those have been the big questions from e-mail coming from people who use this site.

If I forgot something, remind me please.

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.

Posted at 04:53 pm by thecommonills
 

Democracy Now: exclusive interview with Aristide; Bob Somerby, Matthew Rothschild, Ruth Conniff, John Conyers Jr., Rob Reiner

Democracy Now! (Marcia: "always worth watching"):

Headlines for May 10, 2005
- Marines Launch Large Offensive in Western Iraq
- CIA Retains Control Of Iraq's Intelligence Service
- U.S. To Spend $50M On Prison Expansion in Iraq
- New Questions Raised About UN Nominee John Bolton
- Mexico City Mayor Officially Announces Presidential Candidacy
- Gov't Drops Cases of 16-Year-Old "Would-Be Suicide Bombers"

National Broadcast Exclusive: Ousted Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide Speaks From Exile
In a Democracy Now national broadcast exclusive, we spend the hour with ousted Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide. Fourteen months ago, Aristide was flown to the Central African Republic in what he called a modern-day kidnapping in the service of a coup d'etat backed by the United States. Two weeks after his ouster, he defied Washington and returned to the Caribbean accompanied by a delegation of U.S. and Jamaican lawmakers. Aristide was eventually granted asylum in South Africa, where he now lives.
In the first extended interview in this country since his exile, we speak with President Aristide about the ailing former Prime Minister Yvon Neptune, whether he will return to Haiti, the continuation of the "black holocaust" and much more. [includes rush transcript - partial]

Billie e-mails to note Bob Somerby's latest The Daily Howler. Billie notes that Somerby is addressing several issues but "it boils down to the responsibility of the press." (Somerby also notes that Ann Coulter will be on The Tonight Show tonight -- the mainstreaming of Ann continues.) Billie also says she has no idea what to recommend for an excerpt. Me neither, so we'll just go with the start of the piece:

FOR INFORMATION, READ THE OPINIONS: Omigod! In today's New York Times, readers actually get some basic info about judicial filibusters. Here is the passage in question:
NEW YORK TIMES (5/10/05):
Since 1789, the Senate has rejected nearly 20 percent of all nominees to the Supreme Court, many without an up-or-down vote.
In 1968 Republican senators used a filibuster to block voting on President Lyndon B. Johnson's nominee for chief justice of the Supreme Court. During the debate, a Republican senator, Robert Griffin, said: "It is important to realize that it has not been unusual for the Senate to indicate its lack of approval for a nomination by just making sure that it never came to a vote on the merits. As I said, 21 nominations to the [Supreme] court have failed to win Senate approval. But only nine of that number were rejected on a direct, up-and-down vote."
Between 1968 and 2001, both parties used filibusters to oppose judicial nominees. In 2000, the last year of Bill Clinton's presidency, Republican senators filibustered two of his nominees to be circuit judges. They also prevented Senate votes on more than 60 of Mr. Clinton's judicial nominees by other means.
Interesting! And which intrepid Times reporter passed on this relevant information? Actually, this didn't appear in a news report; it comes from an op-ed column by George Mitchell, former Dem Senate leader. Mitchell's column continues a practice we have often mentioned before. At the Washington Post and the New York Times, you increasingly have to read the editorials or the op-ed columns to get basic information about the basic events of the day.
Why is Mitchell's (slightly-spun) info so relevant? All over cable, all over talk radio, the usual dissemblers have been telling the public that--well, let's listen in on Michael Reagan, disinforming on Hannity & Colmes:
REAGAN (4/13/05):
No, it hasn't happened any time before in history. This is the first time in history that a filibuster is being used against nominees.Yes, use the filibuster against legislation. It always has been used against legislation. That's a good place to have it. But against nominees is wrong...What's going on is strictly politics.
"This is the first time in history that a filibuster is being used against nominees." Uh-oh! As Mitchell's piece makes clear, that just wasn't true. But so what? All over cable, all over talk radio, the public has actively been disinformed about this matter.


Keesha e-mails to note Matthew Rothschild's "This Just In" entitled "Bush Sells a Lemon at Nissan Factory:"

So there was Bush, out on the hustings at a Nissan factory in Canton, Mississippi, trying to sell his lemon of a Social Security plan to workers he's planning on shafting.
His scheme would reduce guaranteed benefits to all but the poorest people in the country.
For those with decent working class jobs in auto factories, the pain would be severe. Someone on the line at the Nissan factory who is making $36,600 will lose 16 percent of Social Security retirement benefits.
That worker's child, if he or she made the median wage and retired in 2075, would see a 28 percent cut in benefits.
For higher wage earners at the plant, the bite would be even greater. A worker making $58,500 who retires forty years from now would lose 25 percent. That worker's child, making the same wage, would face a 42 percent shortfall.
And if you throw in Bush's privatization plan on top of these cuts, the benefit cuts would be even more dramatic. A median wage earner who retires in 2055 would lose 66 percent of guaranteed benefits, according to a study by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (
www.cbpp.org). The worker making $58,500 would lose 87 percent.

We'll stay with The Progressive (Rothschild's editor of The Progressive) to note Ruth Conniff's Mondays blog. Wally e-mailed to highlight her latest entry is entitled "The Raving Right:"

Pity the rightwing intellectuals. After years of cultivating an attitude of smug contrarianism during the Clinton years, sneering from the sidelines, they now have to stick up for their team as it wields power. And what a team it is. Between the mess in Iraq, the sagging economy, oil prices, Terri Schiavo, Justice Sunday and Tom DeLay, it's hard to put a good face--let alone a superior one--on the Republican program.
But someone has to do it.

Thus, in his Sunday op-ed column in the New York Times, an uncharacteristically peevish David Brooks slams liberals for not getting on board with Bush's Social Security plan.Brooks attacks Bush's critics for demagoguery. "Sometimes you had to walk through Democratic precincts in a gas mask, the lofty rhetoric was so thick. But now we have definitive proof that they didn't mean it. It was all hokum," writes Brooks.
Brooks's "proof" is that liberals won't acknowledge the merit of Bush's "redistributive" plan to index Social Security benefits to wages--so people who make more money absorb the proposed benefit cuts, while the poor, presumably, get more. Never mind that Social Security was specifically designed to withstand the kind of assault that brought down AFDC precisely because all Americans feel they have a stake in the program. Brooks surely knows this bit of history, but he chooses to ignore it.

From The Black Commentator, Cedric e-mails to note John Conyers, Jr.'s "51% Is Not A Mandate Especially When All the Votes Were Not Counted:"

The mainstream media seems to be waking up to the idea that all of the post-election talk about a mandate was just that: talk. Under the understated headline, "Doubts About Mandate for Bush, GOP," the Washington Post reports that the President's poll numbers are plummeting, his social security privatization plan and cuts are unpopular, and Congressional Republicans are abusing their power and are, likewise, very unpopular. They conclude that maybe there was never a mandate after all. In other words, they conclude "the main question facing Bush and his party is whether they misread the November elections."

Elaine e-mails to note The Huffington Post. Elaine wanted to note Rob Reiner's "Where Have You Gone Woodward & Bernstein?" Here's an excerpt:

Just yesterday, I was in the midst of a rant about the abysmal state of education funding in this country when a friend rejoined, "We get the government we deserve."
I have been fighting this toxic mixture of superiority and cynicism since I became involved in the child advocacy movement almost 11 years ago. The truth is, when Americans are treated with respect and receive accurate information, they make wonderfully wise decisions. The system breaks down, however, when the press fails to provide such information, as they do today. The so-called fourth estate is now little more than the public relations arm of a government propaganda machine in which all three branches are controlled by the same political party. Who is watching the store?
In some ways, the mass media are all of our surrogates for the truth – they are our eyes and ears. In days gone by, they were just that. To take but one example, the Washington Post famously risked their entire existence when they pursued a story about a suspicious break-in long after everyone else believed the story was dead. Would they make the same tough decisions today? Would any media outlet? Certainly not if there was a government-issued Video News Release handy.


The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.

[Note: This entry originally appeared at The Common Ills.]

Posted at 04:12 pm by thecommonills
 

Ruth's Morning Edition Report

Ruth's Morning Edition Report

Ruth: Today I want to focus on an easy chuckle because sometimes we all need one. On Morning Edition today [Monday] we had Cokie Roberts making her usual appearence:

Political Wrap: Filibuster Debate

Morning Edition, May 9, 2005 · News analyst Cokie Roberts discusses the confrontation expected this week in the Senate over the filibuster. Republicans are threatening to change Senate rules so that a simple majority could stop debate on a judicial nominee. Currently, 60 votes are required. Democrats are threatening to bring Senate work to a halt in response.

Cokie does her usual slippery commentary. I will say that Steve Inskeep does ask questions, for a change. But she still gets away with a few dubious claims.

That's nothing suprising, that's Cokie.


Cokie: There's no debate in the Constitution on this . . . so you can't go back to the founders on it except colonial legislatures did have unlimited debate so it's possible that when they said the Senate should advise and consent they knew they could talk it to death.

Talk it death? Old windbag Cokie may have found a subject she can "analyze."

Also don't miss her pleased with herself chuckle when Steve speaks of her expertise.

[Note: This entry originally appeared at The Common Ills.]


Posted at 04:36 am by thecommonills
 

Sweat & Urine and "extreme dining" make the front page, real news is trapped inside this morning's New York Times

Sweat & Urine and "extreme dining" make the front page, real news is trapped inside this morning's New York Times

A new portrayal of John R. Bolton describes him as having so angered senior State Department officials with his public comments that the deputy secretary of state, Richard L. Armitage, ordered two years ago that Mr. Bolton be blocked from delivering speeches and testimony unless they were personally approved by Mr. Armitage.
The detailed account was provided to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee by Lawrence S. Wilkerson, a longtime aide to former Secretary of State Colin L. Powell. Mr. Wilkerson said that Mr. Bolton, who was then an under secretary of state, had caused "problems" by speaking out on North Korea, the International Atomic Energy Agency and other delicate issues in remarks that had not been properly cleared.
"Therefore, the deputy made a decision, and communicated that decision to me, that John Bolton would not give any testimony, nor would he give any speech, that wasn't cleared first by Rich," Mr. Wilkerson said, according to a transcript of an hourlong interview with members of the committee staff last Thursday.
In an e-mail message on Monday, Mr. Wilkerson said of the restrictions imposed on Mr. Bolton that "if anything, they got more stringent" as time went on. "No one else was subjected to these tight restrictions," he said.


The above is from page A9's "No. 2 at State Dept. Was Said to Put Restrictions on Bolton" by Douglas Jehl. Apparently, whether you're turned on by piss or sweat is front page news (a study on sexual attraction out of Sweden) as it the "clamber" ing "down rocks as slippery as wet spinach" in pursuit of "the wild abalone." But potential UN ambassador is "inside the paper" news. This sort of "lifestyle" front paging occurs every Sunday but it's really sad that it's now happening during the week as well.

Lily e-mails to note Carlotta Gall's "Top Suspects in Afghanistan Are Included in Amnesty:"

The head of Afghanistan's peace and reconciliation commission offered an amnesty on Monday for all rebels fighting American and government forces, and even extended the offer to two of the most wanted Afghan terrorism suspects: the Taliban leader Mullah Muhammad Omar and the renegade warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. However, an American military spokesman seemed to suggest that the two suspects could not be included in the program.
[. . .]
However, a United States military spokesman in Kabul, Col. James Yonts, seemed to cast doubt on Mr. Mojadeddi's offer to Mullah Omar and Mr. Hekmatyar, though he did not mention the two specifically. He said that while the military supported the reconciliation program and would offer assistance, all those guilty of terrorism or other serious crimes would not be allowed to join. All candidates would be screened by the National Security Council and intelligence officers, he said.

Lily: I wasn't even aware that Afghanistan had a National Security Council!

Lily's using humor to make a point: "We sure seem to have our fingers, and other protusions, in everything these days. I missed the headlines about Afghanistan being our new colony, I'm guessing."

We'll also note that this story appears on page A6. (Maybe if it were about sweat and urine . . .)

Mark e-mailed to note Neil A. Lewis and Carl Hulse's "Jockeying Intensifies in Battle Over Judicial Nominees" (which appears on A13):


"Let's step away from the precipice," said Senator Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada and the minority leader. "Let's try cooperation rather than confrontation."
The Republicans declined, interested in maintaining indignation over other blocked nominees to fortify themselves to change the filibuster rules.
The majority leader, Senator Bill Frist of Tennessee, said there should be a floor vote on all the nominees.


Mark: Harry Reid is so disgusting and so willing to roll over and practice appeasement. Everyone needs to read the thing at A Winding Road.

Wally e-mails to note David D. Kirkpatrick's "Republican Suggests a Judicial Inspector General:"


"The judiciary isn't supposed to write law, and the Congress cannot determine how a court will rule," he added. "But the branches are interdependent entities as well."
Mr. Sensenbrenner's remarks, in which he called "judicial activism" a growing problem, were an indication of what steps Congress might take in a developing power struggle with the courts.


Wally: If ever a fleeting mention called for a "news analysis," this latest attack on the judiciary is it.

That story (like the one above it) appears on A13.

Lastly, Billie e-mails to note Kate Zernike's "Behind Failed Abu Ghraib Plea, A Tale of Breakups and Betryal:"

To some, the grave misdeeds at Abu Ghraib, where the three soldiers worked for six months in 2003, have become a twisted symbol of the American military occupation of Iraq. But the scandal is also one rooted in the behavior of military reservists working at the prison, an environment that testimony has portrayed as more frat house than military prison, a place where inmates were routinely left naked and soldiers took pictures of one another simulating sex with fruit.
The reservists' treatment of Iraqi prisoners and their entanglements with one another - pieced together from documents, court testimony, e-mail and interviews - have produced a dark soap opera, one whose episodes have continued to play out in the months since the scandal erupted, and culminated in the Texas courtroom last week.


On the subject of the urine & sweat story, Marica e-mails to note the headline which reads "For Gay Men, Different Scent of Attraction."

Marcia: Maybe it's time for a panel on headline writers? Gay men are the "other" in the headline. Why is that? Why not "For Straight Men, Different Scent of Attraction?" And were lesbians left out of the study?

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.

[Note: This entry originally appeared at The Common Ills.]

Posted at 04:35 am by thecommonills
 

Monday, May 09, 2005
Link for The Huffington Post

Link for The Huffington Post

As noted earlier, the last two posts weren't planned for tonight. (But again, members determine what we focus on.) Arianna Huffington's new site went up today. I didn't even have time to check it out. If you didn't as well, it's The Huffington Post and I'll try to include the link to it in a post tomorrow morning (and we will do a permalink to it tomorrow evening).

The e-mail address for this site is common_ills@yahoo.com.

[Note: This entry originally appeared at The Common Ills.]

Posted at 10:53 pm by thecommonills
 


Next Page




<< April 2005 >>
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 01 02
03 04 05 06 07 08 09
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30


If you want to be updated on this weblog Enter your email here:




rss feed